Effect of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Biopsy on Radiation Treatment Recommendations

被引:6
|
作者
Reed, Aaron [1 ]
Valle, Luca F. [1 ]
Shankavaram, Uma [1 ]
Krauze, Andra [1 ]
Kaushal, Aradhana [1 ]
Schott, Erica [1 ]
Cooley-Zgela, Theresa [1 ]
Wood, Bradford [2 ]
Pinto, Peter [3 ]
Choyke, Peter [4 ]
Turkbey, Baris [4 ]
Citrin, Deborah E. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Radiat Oncol Branch, Ctr Canc Res, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Ctr Intervent Oncol, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NCI, Urol Oncol Branch, Ctr Canc Res, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, Ctr Canc Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
IMAGING TARGETED BIOPSY; CANCER; MRI; TRANSPERINEAL; INTERMEDIATE; RADIOTHERAPY; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.12.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Targeted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy (MRI-Bx) has recently been compared with the standard of care extended sextant ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (SOC-Bx), with the former associated with an increased rate of detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. The present study sought to determine the influence of MRI-Bx on radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) recommendations. Methods and Materials: All patients who had received radiation treatment and had undergone SOC-Bx and MRI-Bx at our institution were included. Using the clinical T stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score, patients were categorized into National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk groups and radiation treatment or ADT recommendations assigned. Intensification of the recommended treatment after multiparametric MRI, SOC-Bx, and MRI-Bx was evaluated. Results: From January 2008 to January 2016, 73 patients received radiation therapy at our institution after undergoing a simultaneous SOC-Bx and MRI-Bx (n=47 with previous SOC-Bx). Repeat SOC-Bx and MRI-Bx resulted in frequent upgrading compared with previous SOC-Bx (Gleason score 7, 6.7% vs 44.6%; P<.001; Gleason score 8-10, 2.1% vs 38%; P<.01). MRI-Bx increased the proportion of patients classified as very high risk from 24.7% to 41.1% (P=.027). Compared with SOC-Bx alone, including the MRI-Bx findings resulted in a greater percentage of pathologically positive cores (mean 37% vs 44%). Incorporation of multiparametric MRI and MRI-Bx results increased the recommended use and duration of ADT (duration increased in 28 of 73 patients and ADT was added for 8 of 73 patients). Conclusions: In patients referred for radiation treatment, MRI-Bx resulted in an increase in the percentage of positive cores, Gleason score, and risk grouping. The benefit of treatment intensification in accordance with the MRI-Bx findings is unknown. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 951
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Fusion Biopsy Commonly Alters Radiation-Based Treatment Recommendations
    Reed, A.
    Valle, L.
    Krauze, A. V.
    Kaushal, A.
    Choyke, P.
    Turkbey, B.
    Pinto, P. A.
    Wood, B.
    Citrin, D. E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E262 - E263
  • [22] Magnetic Resonance - Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Argun, Omer Burak
    Obek, Can
    Kural, Ali Riza
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2016, 15 (02): : 76 - 79
  • [23] Comparisons between magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy and standard biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer A prospective cohort study
    Zhu, Guangbin
    Wang, Quan
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (36)
  • [24] Comparison of procedural anxiety and pain associated with conventional transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: a prospective cohort trial
    Deivasigamani, Sriram
    Adams, Eric S.
    Kotamarti, Srinath
    Mottaghi, Mahdi
    Taha, Terek
    Aminsharifi, Ali
    Michael, Zoe
    Seguier, Denis
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2024, 27 (02) : 294 - 299
  • [25] Comparative diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy versus systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer
    Fang, Jian-hua
    Zhang, Liqing
    Xie, Xi
    Zhao, Pan
    Bao, Lingyun
    Kong, Fanlei
    PEERJ, 2023, 11
  • [26] MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING/ULTRASOUND FUSION-GUIDED BIOPSY DETECTS CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER IN THE CENTRAL GLAND CORRELATING WITH INDEX LESION
    Fascelli, Michele
    Frye, Thomas
    George, Arvin
    Abboud, Steven
    Chelluri, Raju
    Ho, Richard
    Diaz, Annerleim Walton
    Sankineni, Sandeep
    Merino, Maria
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter
    Wood, Bradford
    Pinto, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E826 - E826
  • [27] Multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy significantly improves cancer detection in the Chinese population
    Ma, W. K.
    Ho, B.
    Wong, C.
    Lai, A.
    Lam, A.
    Lam, A.
    Yip, L.
    Lai, T.
    Tsang, C.
    Ng, A.
    Tsu, J.
    Yiu, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 42 - 42
  • [28] Comparison of procedural anxiety and pain associated with conventional transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: a prospective cohort trial
    Sriram Deivasigamani
    Eric S. Adams
    Srinath Kotamarti
    Mahdi Mottaghi
    Terek Taha
    Ali Aminsharifi
    Zoe Michael
    Denis Seguier
    Thomas J. Polascik
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2024, 27 : 294 - 299
  • [29] Comparison of procedural anxiety and pain associated with conventional transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: a prospective cohort trial
    Celeste Manfredi
    Francesco Ditonno
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2024, 27 : 163 - 164
  • [30] Comparison of MR/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy With Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Turkbey, Baris
    George, Arvin K.
    Rothwax, Jason
    Shakir, Nabeel
    Okoro, Chinonyerem
    Raskolnikov, Dima
    Parnes, Howard L.
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Merino, Maria J.
    Simon, Richard M.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (04): : 390 - 397