Effect of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Biopsy on Radiation Treatment Recommendations

被引:6
|
作者
Reed, Aaron [1 ]
Valle, Luca F. [1 ]
Shankavaram, Uma [1 ]
Krauze, Andra [1 ]
Kaushal, Aradhana [1 ]
Schott, Erica [1 ]
Cooley-Zgela, Theresa [1 ]
Wood, Bradford [2 ]
Pinto, Peter [3 ]
Choyke, Peter [4 ]
Turkbey, Baris [4 ]
Citrin, Deborah E. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Radiat Oncol Branch, Ctr Canc Res, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Ctr Intervent Oncol, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NCI, Urol Oncol Branch, Ctr Canc Res, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, Ctr Canc Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
IMAGING TARGETED BIOPSY; CANCER; MRI; TRANSPERINEAL; INTERMEDIATE; RADIOTHERAPY; DECISIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.12.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Targeted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy (MRI-Bx) has recently been compared with the standard of care extended sextant ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (SOC-Bx), with the former associated with an increased rate of detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. The present study sought to determine the influence of MRI-Bx on radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) recommendations. Methods and Materials: All patients who had received radiation treatment and had undergone SOC-Bx and MRI-Bx at our institution were included. Using the clinical T stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score, patients were categorized into National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk groups and radiation treatment or ADT recommendations assigned. Intensification of the recommended treatment after multiparametric MRI, SOC-Bx, and MRI-Bx was evaluated. Results: From January 2008 to January 2016, 73 patients received radiation therapy at our institution after undergoing a simultaneous SOC-Bx and MRI-Bx (n=47 with previous SOC-Bx). Repeat SOC-Bx and MRI-Bx resulted in frequent upgrading compared with previous SOC-Bx (Gleason score 7, 6.7% vs 44.6%; P<.001; Gleason score 8-10, 2.1% vs 38%; P<.01). MRI-Bx increased the proportion of patients classified as very high risk from 24.7% to 41.1% (P=.027). Compared with SOC-Bx alone, including the MRI-Bx findings resulted in a greater percentage of pathologically positive cores (mean 37% vs 44%). Incorporation of multiparametric MRI and MRI-Bx results increased the recommended use and duration of ADT (duration increased in 28 of 73 patients and ADT was added for 8 of 73 patients). Conclusions: In patients referred for radiation treatment, MRI-Bx resulted in an increase in the percentage of positive cores, Gleason score, and risk grouping. The benefit of treatment intensification in accordance with the MRI-Bx findings is unknown. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 951
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Biopsy on Radiation Treatment Recommendations
    Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda
    Maryland, United States
    不详
    Maryland, United States
    不详
    Maryland, United States
    不详
    Maryland, United States
    Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 5 (947-951):
  • [2] The Learning Curve for Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy
    Kasabwala, Khushabu
    Patel, Neal
    Cricco-Lizza, Eliza
    Shimpi, Adrian A.
    Weng, Stanley
    Buchmann, Rose M.
    Motanagh, Samaneh
    Wu, Yiyuan
    Banerjee, Samprit
    Khani, Francesca
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Robinson, Brian D.
    Hu, Jim C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2019, 2 (02): : 135 - 140
  • [3] Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsy-A Systematic Review
    Rai, Bhavan Prasad
    Mayerhofer, Christoph
    Somani, Bhaskar Kumar
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Nagele, Udo
    Tokas, Theodoros
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (06): : 904 - 913
  • [4] Target detection: Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (06) : 903 - 911
  • [5] Primary magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy of the prostate
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Kittner, Beatrice
    Blobel, Conrad
    Wiemer, Laura
    Hofbauer, Sebastian L.
    Fischer, Thomas
    Asbach, Patrick
    Haas, Matthias
    Penzkofer, Tobias
    Fuller, Florian
    Miller, Kurt
    Cash, Hannes
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (02) : 211 - 218
  • [6] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy: a comparison with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
    Silecchia, G.
    Falagario, U.
    Sanguedolce, F.
    Macarini, L.
    Autorino, R.
    Cormio, L.
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2018, 66 (04): : 200 - 204
  • [7] Comparison of Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Biopsy With Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Bidnur, Samir
    Black, Peter C.
    UROLOGY, 2016, 89 : 6 - 7
  • [8] MAGNETIC RESONANCE / ULTRASOUND FUSION-GUIDED CRYOABLATION OF THE PROSTATE
    Wang, Robert
    Davenport, Matthew
    Curci, Nicole
    Shankar, Prasad
    Miller, David
    George, Arvin
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E849 - E849
  • [9] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Review of Technology, Techniques, and Outcomes
    Michael Kongnyuy
    Arvin K. George
    Ardeshir R. Rastinehad
    Peter A. Pinto
    Current Urology Reports, 2016, 17
  • [10] COMPARISON OF ELASTIC AND RIGID REGISTRATION DURDING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING/ULTRASOUND FUSION-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Hale, Graham R.
    Czarniecki, Marcin
    Cheng, Alexis
    Bloom, Jonathan B.
    Seifabadi, Reza
    Gold, Samuel A.
    Rayn, Kareem N.
    Sabarwal, Vik
    Grave, Gustavo Pena-La
    Valera, Vladimir
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Turkbey, Baris
    Wood, Brad
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E338 - E339