Electrical impedance myography: A critical review and outlook

被引:31
|
作者
Sanchez, Benjamin [1 ]
Martinsen, Orjan G. [2 ,3 ]
Freeborn, Todd J. [4 ]
Furse, Cynthia M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Sanchez Res Lab, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Phys, N-0371 Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Clin & Biomed Engn, N-0372 Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Alabama, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[5] Univ Utah, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Electrical impedance myography; Volume conduction properties; Near- and far-field potentials; Muscle;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinph.2020.11.014
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Electrical impedance myography (EIM) technology is finding application in neuromuscular disease research as a tool to assess muscle health. Correlations between EIM outcomes, functional, imaging and histological data have been established in a variety of neuromuscular disorders; however, an analytical discussion of EIM is lacking. This review presents an explanation for clinicians and others who are applying EIM and interpreting impedance outcomes. The background of EIM is presented, including the relation between EIM, volume conduction properties, tissue structure, electrode configuration and conductor volume. Also discussed are technical considerations to guide the reader to critically evaluate EIM and understand its limitations and strengths. (c) 2020 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 344
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effects of age on muscle as measured by electrical impedance myography
    Aaron, Ronald
    Esper, Gregory J.
    Shiffman, Carl A.
    Bradonjic, Kaca
    Lee, Kyungmouk S.
    Rutkove, Seward B.
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2006, 27 (10) : 953 - 959
  • [22] Electrical impedance myography: A new tool in the assessment of radiculopathy
    Rutkove, SB
    Aaron, R
    Partida, RA
    Esper, GJ
    Shiffman, CA
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2004, 30 (04) : 514 - 514
  • [23] Electrical Impedance Myography as a Biomarker in Spinal Muscular Atrophy
    Rutkove, Seward
    Gregas, Matthew
    Mongiovi, Phillip
    Darras, Basil
    NEUROLOGY, 2011, 76 (09) : A408 - A409
  • [24] Assessing neuromuscular disease with multifrequency electrical impedance myography
    Esper, Gregory J.
    Shiffman, Carl A.
    Aaron, Ronald
    Lee, Kyungmouk S.
    Rutkove, Seward B.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2006, 34 (05) : 595 - 602
  • [25] Electrical Impedance Myography and Its Applications in Neuromuscular Disorders
    Sanchez, Benjamin
    Rutkove, Seward B.
    NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2017, 14 (01) : 107 - 118
  • [26] Multifrequency electrical impedance myography in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
    Tarulli, A. W.
    Shiffman, C. A.
    Aaron, R.
    Chin, A. B.
    Rutkove, S. B.
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL BIOIMPEDANCE AND THE 8TH CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY 2007, 2007, 17 : 647 - +
  • [27] Electrical impedance myography in the bedside assessment of inflammatory myopathy
    Tarulli, A
    Esper, GJ
    Lee, KS
    Aaron, R
    Shiffman, CA
    Rutkove, SB
    NEUROLOGY, 2005, 65 (03) : 451 - 452
  • [28] Electrical impedance myography as a biomarker to assess ALS progression
    Rutkove, Seward B.
    Caress, James B.
    Cartwright, Michael S.
    Burns, Ted M.
    Warder, Judy
    David, William S.
    Goyal, Namita
    Maragakis, Nicholas J.
    Clawson, Lora
    Benatar, Michael
    Usher, Sharon
    Sharma, Khema R.
    Gautam, Shiva
    Narayanaswami, Pushpa
    Raynor, Elizabeth M.
    Watson, Mary Lou
    Shefner, Jeremy M.
    AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS, 2012, 13 (05): : 439 - 445
  • [29] USING ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE MYOGRAPHY TO EVALUATE TONGUE HEALTH
    McIlduff, C. E.
    Gesibush, T. R.
    Mijailovic, A.
    Yim, S. J.
    Rutkove, S. B.
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2014, 50 : S5 - S6
  • [30] Recording characteristics of electrical impedance myography needle electrodes
    Kwon, H.
    Rutkove, S. B.
    Sanchez, B.
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2017, 38 (09) : 1748 - 1765