Precision of meshfree methods and application to forward modeling of two-dimensional electromagnetic sources

被引:7
|
作者
Li Jun-Jie [1 ]
Yan Jia-Bin [2 ]
Huang Xiang-Yu [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Design Inst Water Conservancy & Hydroele, Hangzhou 310002, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Cent S Univ, Sch Geosci & Infophys, Key Lab Nonferrous Resources & Geol Hazard Detec, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Element-free Galerkin method; point interpolation method; radial point interpolation method; Poisson equation; controlled-source; electromagnetic modeling; coupled meshfree method; MESHLESS METHOD; LINE SOURCE; ELEMENT; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11770-015-0511-3
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Meshfree method offers high accuracy and computational capability and constructs the shape function without relying on predefined elements. We comparatively analyze the global weak form meshfree methods, such as element-free Galerkin method (EFGM), the point interpolation method (PIM), and the radial point interpolation method (RPIM). Taking two dimensional Poisson equation as an example, we discuss the support-domain dimensionless size, the field nodes, and background element settings with respect to their effect on calculation accuracy of the meshfree method. RPIM and EFGM are applied to controlled-source two-dimensional electromagnetic modeling with fixed shape parameters. The accuracy of boundary conditions imposed directly and by a penalty function are discussed in the case of forward modeling of two-dimensional magnetotellurics in a homogeneous medium model. The coupling algorithm of EFG-PIM and EFG-RPIM are generated by integrating the PIM or RPIM and EFGM. The results of the numerical modeling suggest the following. First, the proposed meshfree method and corresponding coupled methods are well-suited for electromagnetic numerical modeling. The accuracy of the algorithm is the highest when the support-domain dimensionless size is 1.0 and the distribution of field nodes is consistent with the nodes of background elements. Second, the accuracy of PIM and RPIM are lower than that of EFGM for the Poisson equation but higher than EFGM for the homogeneous medium MT response. Third, RPIM overcomes the matrix inversion problem of PIM and has a wider selection of support-domain dimensionless sizes as compared to RPIM.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 515
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Failure transitions in metal plates with a two-dimensional meshfree continuum method
    Wang, S.
    Liu, H.
    THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2012, 50 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [42] Two-dimensional electrophoresis of precision-cut testis slices: Toxicologic application
    Witzmann, FA
    Fultz, CD
    Wyman, JF
    ELECTROPHORESIS, 1997, 18 (3-4) : 642 - 646
  • [43] Two-dimensional microfabricated sources for nanoelectrospray
    Le Gac, S
    Arscott, S
    Cren-Olivé, C
    Rolando, C
    JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2003, 38 (12): : 1259 - 1264
  • [44] Methods of two-dimensional spectroscopy
    Kneer, F
    FIRST ADVANCES IN SOLAR PHYSICS EUROCONFERENCE : ADVANCES IN THE PHYSICS OF SUNSPOTS, 1997, 118 : 329 - 333
  • [45] Relaxometry: Two-Dimensional Methods
    Hills, Brian P.
    eMagRes, 2009, 2009
  • [46] Two-dimensional modeling of electroremediation
    Jacobs, RA
    Probstein, RF
    AICHE JOURNAL, 1996, 42 (06) : 1685 - 1696
  • [47] Review of Two-dimensional Meso-modeling Methods of Concrete Aggregate
    Ruan X.
    Li Y.
    Jin Z.
    Pan Z.
    Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University, 2018, 46 (05): : 604 - 612
  • [48] MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS ON TWO-DIMENSIONAL MATERIALS FORWARD
    Wee, Andrew
    Novoselov, Kostya S.
    Arramel
    SURFACE REVIEW AND LETTERS, 2021, 28 (08)
  • [49] Application of OSRC to electromagnetic scattering from two-dimensional homogeneous dielectric cylinder
    Chen, Zhining
    Zhang, Wenxun
    Xie, Xiren
    Tien Tzu Hsueh Pao/Acta Electronica Sinica, 1993, 21 (06): : 94 - 96
  • [50] Two-dimensional Forward Modeling of the Tunnel Lining Disease GPR Wave Field Characteristics
    Xu Hao
    Liu Jiangping
    Tang Weiyu
    Mao Mao
    NEAR-SURFACE GEOPHYSICS AND ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION, 2012, : 339 - 343