A Framework for Development and Communication of Absolute Environmental Sustainability Assessment Methods

被引:41
|
作者
Bjorn, Anders [1 ,2 ]
Richardson, Katherine [3 ]
Hauschild, Michael Zwicky [2 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Montreal, CIRAIG, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Div Quantitat Sustainabil Assessment, Dept Management Engn, Lyngby, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, Nat Hist Museum Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
carrying capacity; context-based sustainability; nitrogen emission; phosphorus emission; planetary boundaries; science-based targets; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PLANETARY BOUNDARIES FRAMEWORK; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ANTHROPOGENIC NITROGEN; HUMAN APPROPRIATION; CARRYING-CAPACITY; CARBON FOOTPRINT; DECISION-MAKING; IMPACT; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12820
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An absolute environmental sustainability assessment (AESA) addresses whether a production or consumption activity can be considered environmentally sustainable in an absolute sense. This involves a comparison of its environmental pressure to its allocated environmental carrying capacity. AESA methods have been developed in multiple academic fields, each using their own set of concepts and terms with little communication across the fields. A recent growing interest in using AESA methods for decision support calls for a better common understanding of the constituents of an AESA method and how it can be communicated to scientific peers and to potential users. With this aim, we develop a framework for AESA methods, composed of a succession of four assessment steps and involving six methodological choices that must be made by the method developer or the user. We then use the framework to analyze and compare five selected AESA methods that focus on the release of phosphorus and nitrogen to the environment. In this manner, we show that the framework is able to systematically differentiate AESA methods that initially appear to be similar. Intended users of the framework include (1) method developers communicating new AESA methods to academic peers or potential method users and (2) researchers comparing a group of existing AESA methods and communicating their differences to their peers and to potential users looking for guidance on method selection.
引用
收藏
页码:838 / 854
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DESIGNING SUSTAINABILITY. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODS AND STRATEGIES
    Alini, Luigi
    Martino, Antonello
    TECHNE-JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY FOR ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 26 : 267 - 275
  • [22] Comparative environmental sustainability assessment of biohydrogen production methods
    Goren, A. Yagmur
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    Khalvati, Ali
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 904
  • [23] Environmental sustainability and the integration of different methods for its assessment
    Nadia Marchettini
    Valentina Niccolucci
    Federico Maria Pulselli
    Enzo Tiezzi
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research - International, 2007, 14 : 227 - 228
  • [24] Environmental sustainability and the integration of different methods for its assessment
    Marchettini, Nadia
    Niccolucci, Valentina
    Pulselli, Federico Maria
    Tiezzi, Enzo
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2007, 14 (04) : 227 - 228
  • [25] The application of Strategic Environmental Assessment to sustainability assessment of infrastructure development
    Arce, T
    Gullón, N
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2000, 20 (03) : 393 - 402
  • [26] An integrated framework for the assessment of environmental sustainability in wood supply chains
    Dalalah, Doraid
    Khan, Sharfuddin Ahmed
    Al-Ashram, Yazan
    Albeetar, Saeed
    Abou Ali, Yahya
    Alkhouli, Elias
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2022, 27
  • [27] Absolute environmental sustainability assessment of a Danish utility company relative to the Planetary Boundaries
    Ryberg, Morten W.
    Bjerre, Troels K.
    Nielsen, Per Henrik
    Hauschild, Michael
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2021, 25 (03) : 765 - 777
  • [28] Integrating Environmental Issues in the Development of Communication Skills and the Importance of Environmental Sustainability Training
    Marcu, Nicoleta Aurelia
    Morar, Petru-Dragos
    Rus, Dana
    15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INTERDISCIPLINARITY IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 386 : 426 - 439
  • [29] Planetary boundary downscaling for absolute environmental sustainability assessment - Case study of Taiwan
    Huang, Lance Hongwei
    Hu, Allen H.
    Kuo, Chien-Hung
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 114
  • [30] Development of a sustainability assessment framework for geothermal energy projects
    Shortall, Ruth
    Davidsdottir, Brynhildur
    Axelsson, Gudni
    ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 27 : 28 - 45