Modelling trade-offs in students' choice set when determining universities

被引:5
|
作者
Kusumawati, Andriani [1 ]
Perera, Nelson [2 ]
Yanamandram, Venkata [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brawijaya, Dept Business Adm, Malang, Indonesia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Sch Accounting Econ & Finance, Fac Business, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Wollongong, Sydney Business Sch, Fac Business, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
关键词
Conjoint analysis; Trade-offs; Higher-education marketing; Student choice; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; HIGHER-EDUCATION; COLLEGE CHOICE; INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS; DESTINATION CHOICE; SELECTION; DECISION;
D O I
10.1108/IJEM-01-2018-0007
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the factors influencing Indonesian students' choice of university by estimating the trade-off students make in selecting a university. Design/methodology/approach Conjoint analysis was used to examine the relative importance and the part-worth scores of the attributes that influence students' public university preferences in Indonesia. Findings High-school leavers in Indonesia trade off university preferences and view advice from family, friends, and/or teachers, reputation, and job prospects as important factors for selecting a public university. Two different preference-based segments of prospective students were identified from cluster analysis, and classified as either a "social networks-based decision" or a "rational decision" segment. A choice simulator was employed with three propositions, and the segments were found to have dissimilar preferences. Originality/value This paper demonstrates the relevance and value of conjoint analysis as an effective analytical tool for the identification of important choice criteria and its potential contribution to the development of more effective marketing strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 989
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ASIC PACKAGE CHOICE CALLS FOR A CLOSE LOOK AT TRADE-OFFS
    STEELE, R
    BULL, L
    COMPUTER DESIGN, 1990, 29 (16): : 22 - 22
  • [22] ENERGY TRADE-OFFS AND FORAGING MODE CHOICE IN AMERICAN EELS
    HELFMAN, GS
    WINKELMAN, DL
    ECOLOGY, 1991, 72 (01) : 310 - 318
  • [23] Trade-offs involved in the choice of pot vs field experiments
    Montesinos, Daniel
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2025, 245 (05) : 1808 - 1809
  • [24] Trade-offs of territory choice in male and female marsh warblers
    Hoi, H
    Ille, R
    AUK, 1996, 113 (01): : 243 - 246
  • [25] Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs
    Van Looy, Bart
    Landoni, Paolo
    Callaert, Julie
    van Pottelsberghe, Bruno
    Sapsalis, Eleftherios
    Debackere, Koenraad
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (04) : 553 - 564
  • [26] LOOK FOR TRADE-OFFS WHEN SELECTING COPPERS FOR ELECTRICAL APPLICATIONS
    MISKA, KH
    MATERIALS ENGINEERING, 1977, 85 (05): : 28 - 30
  • [27] BE READY TO MAKE TRADE-OFFS WHEN SELECTING A PROGRAMMABLE ARCHITECTURE
    TUCK, B
    COMPUTER DESIGN, 1993, 32 (10): : A23 - A26
  • [28] When are multiobjective calibration trade-offs in hydrologic models meaningful?
    Kollat, J. B.
    Reed, P. M.
    Wagener, T.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2012, 48
  • [29] Politicians' and hospital managers' trade-offs in the choice of reimbursement scheme: a discrete choice experiment
    Bech, M
    HEALTH POLICY, 2003, 66 (03) : 261 - 275
  • [30] Attributes, Trade-Offs and Choice: A Conjoint Analysis of Sport Management Programs
    Bravo, Gonzalo A.
    Won, Doyeon
    Ferreira, Mauricio
    SPORT MANAGEMENT EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2009, 3 (01) : 66 - 91