Modelling trade-offs in students' choice set when determining universities

被引:5
|
作者
Kusumawati, Andriani [1 ]
Perera, Nelson [2 ]
Yanamandram, Venkata [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brawijaya, Dept Business Adm, Malang, Indonesia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Sch Accounting Econ & Finance, Fac Business, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Wollongong, Sydney Business Sch, Fac Business, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
关键词
Conjoint analysis; Trade-offs; Higher-education marketing; Student choice; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; HIGHER-EDUCATION; COLLEGE CHOICE; INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS; DESTINATION CHOICE; SELECTION; DECISION;
D O I
10.1108/IJEM-01-2018-0007
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the factors influencing Indonesian students' choice of university by estimating the trade-off students make in selecting a university. Design/methodology/approach Conjoint analysis was used to examine the relative importance and the part-worth scores of the attributes that influence students' public university preferences in Indonesia. Findings High-school leavers in Indonesia trade off university preferences and view advice from family, friends, and/or teachers, reputation, and job prospects as important factors for selecting a public university. Two different preference-based segments of prospective students were identified from cluster analysis, and classified as either a "social networks-based decision" or a "rational decision" segment. A choice simulator was employed with three propositions, and the segments were found to have dissimilar preferences. Originality/value This paper demonstrates the relevance and value of conjoint analysis as an effective analytical tool for the identification of important choice criteria and its potential contribution to the development of more effective marketing strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 989
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trade-Offs in Choice
    Shaddy, Franklin
    Fishbach, Ayelet
    Simonson, Itamar
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 72, 2021, 72 : 181 - 206
  • [2] Trade-Offs and Depletion in Choice
    Wang, Jing
    Novemsky, Nathan
    Dhar, Ravi
    Baumeister, Roy E.
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2010, 47 (05) : 910 - 919
  • [3] When Trade-Offs Matter: The Effect of Choice Construal on Context Effects
    Khan, Uzma
    Zhu, Meng
    Kalra, Ajay
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2011, 48 (01) : 62 - 71
  • [4] Densities and social choice trade-offs
    Toma, Vladimir
    Density Concepts with Applications to the Social Sciences, 2005, 31 : 55 - 63
  • [5] Modelling protected area trade-offs
    Donald L. DeAngelis
    Nature Sustainability, 2019, 2 : 358 - 359
  • [6] Modelling protected area trade-offs
    DeAngelis, Donald L.
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (05) : 358 - 359
  • [7] Trade-offs of spatial development priorities choice
    Kuznetsova, Olga V.
    VOPROSY EKONOMIKI, 2019, (01): : 146 - 157
  • [8] ASYMPTOTIC DENSITY AND SOCIAL CHOICE TRADE-OFFS
    CAMPBELL, DE
    KELLY, JS
    MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1995, 29 (03) : 181 - 194
  • [9] LEBESGUE MEASURE AND SOCIAL CHOICE TRADE-OFFS
    CAMPBELL, DE
    KELLY, JS
    ECONOMIC THEORY, 1995, 5 (03) : 445 - 459
  • [10] WHEN TRADE-OFFS FAVOR ALUMINUM WIRING
    HUPP, JW
    MACHINE DESIGN, 1976, 48 (27) : 94 - 95