The Effect of Single-Dose Propofol Injection on Pain and Quality of Life in Chronic Daily Headache: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

被引:9
|
作者
Simmonds, Mark K. [1 ]
Rashiq, Saifudin [1 ]
Sobolev, Igor A. [1 ]
Dick, Bruce D. [1 ]
Gray, Daniel P. [1 ]
Stewart, Bradley J. [1 ,2 ]
Jamieson-Lega, Kathryn I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada
[2] 600 Hys Ctr, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2009年 / 109卷 / 06期
关键词
INTRAVENOUS PROPOFOL; MIGRAINE HEADACHE; GABA(A) RECEPTOR; CELLS; THIOPENTONE; PERCEPTION; ANALGESIA; MIDAZOLAM; EFFICACY; PERIOD;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181be3f86
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: On the basis of a small number of case studies, IV propofol has been advocated for the treatment of chronic daily headache (CDH). There has been no randomized controlled trial of this therapy. Our objective in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to determine whether a single IV dose of propofol 2.4 mg/kg results in clinically significant reduction in disability or pain in CDH for the next 30 days. METHODS: Eligible adults with CDH received either active treatment with W propofol infusion (n = 20) or active placebo of W midazolam (n = 20). The main outcome measures were (a) Headache Disability Inventory (HDI) at 30 days posttreatment, (b) Headache Index, a summary measure of headache intensity over the 30-day period, and (c) analgesic consumption measured as the Medication Quantification Scale version III. RESULTS: Propofol reduced the HDI by 9.47 Points (SD 14.1) at 30 days after injection (P = 0.009), but this is a smaller reduction in headache-related disability than that which the developers of the HDI regard as clinically significant. There was no statistically significant change in HDI for the control group. There were no significant within- or between-group reductions in mean pain intensity as measured by the Headache Index or medication use as measured by the Medication Quantification Scale version III in either group. CONCLUSIONS: A single IV infusion of propofol 2.4 mg/kg produces a statistically significant, but not clinically meaningful, reduction in disability from CDH 30 days after infusion and does not reduce pain intensity or analgesic use. This study does not support this regimen of IV propofol for clinical management of CDH. (Anesth Analg 2009;109:1972-80)
引用
收藏
页码:1972 / 1980
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Botulinum toxin type A (BOTOX®) for the prophylactic treatment of chronic daily headache:: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Mathew, NT
    Frishberg, BM
    Gawel, M
    Dimitrova, R
    Gibson, J
    Turkel, C
    HEADACHE, 2005, 45 (04): : 293 - 307
  • [32] Botulinum toxin type A for the prophylaxis of chronic daily headache (CDH) in migraineurs: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Frishberg, BM
    Mathew, NT
    Gawel, M
    DeGryse, R
    Turkel, C
    HEADACHE, 2005, 45 (06): : 773 - 774
  • [33] A randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial assessing the effect of the oral cannabinoid nabilone on pain and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia
    Skrabek, R.
    Galimova, L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST CONFERENCE OF THE ASIAN OCEANIA SOCIETY OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2008, : 185 - 185
  • [34] Comparing the Effect of Dienogest and OCPS on Pain and Quality of Life in Women with Endometriosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Niakan, Gelareh
    Rokhgireh, Samaneh
    Ebrahimpour, Majid
    Kashi, Abolfazl Mehdizadeh
    ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 2021, 24 (09) : 670 - 677
  • [35] SINGLE-DOSE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, DOUBLE-DUMMY CROSS-OVER COMPARISON OF EXTRADURAL AND IV CLONIDINE IN CHRONIC PAIN
    CARROLL, D
    JADAD, A
    KING, V
    WIFFEN, P
    GLYNN, C
    MCQUAY, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 71 (05) : 665 - 669
  • [36] Longer analgesic effect with naproxen sodium than ibuprofen in post-surgical dental pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose trial
    Cooper, Stephen A.
    Desjardins, Paul
    Brain, Patrick
    Paredes-Diaz, Alberto
    Troullos, Emanuel
    Centofanti, Robert
    An, Bob
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2019, 35 (12) : 2149 - 2158
  • [37] A DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF SINGLE-DOSE INTRAVAGINAL VERSUS SINGLE-DOSE ORAL METRONIDAZOLE IN THE TREATMENT OF TRICHOMONAL VAGINITIS
    TIDWELL, BH
    LUSHBAUGH, WB
    LAUGHLIN, MD
    CLEARY, JD
    FINLEY, RW
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1994, 170 (01): : 242 - 246
  • [38] CIPROFLOXACIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHOLERA - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF A SINGLE DAILY DOSE IN PERUVIAN ADULTS
    GOTUZZO, E
    SEAS, C
    ECHEVARRIA, J
    CARRILLO, C
    MOSTORINO, R
    RUIZ, R
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1995, 20 (06) : 1485 - 1490
  • [39] Comparing the Effectiveness of Metoclopramide, Low Dose of Propofol, Ondansetron, and Magnesium Sulfate on Propofol Injection Pain: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Biazar, Gelareh
    Farzi, Farnoush
    Tehran, Samaneh Ghazanfar
    Rad, Reyhaneh Shahrokhi
    Habibi, Mohammad Reza
    Sani, Mahsa Khosousi
    Chohdary, Amer
    Yaghoobi, Alireza
    Mirmansouri, Ladan
    CRESCENT JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 9 (04): : 202 - 206
  • [40] Effect of single-dose imipramine on chronic low-back and experimental pain. A randomized controlled trial
    Schliessbach, Juerg
    Siegenthaler, Andreas
    Butikofer, Lukas
    Limacher, Andreas
    Juni, Peter
    Vuilleumier, Pascal H.
    Stamer, Ulrike
    Arendt-Nielsen, Lars
    Curatolo, Michele
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (05):