Joint hypothesis testing of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Youden index

被引:21
|
作者
Yin, Jingjing [1 ]
Mutiso, Fedelis [1 ]
Tian, Lili [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Southern Univ, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Environm Hlth, Statesboro, GA USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Biostat, Buffalo, NY USA
关键词
AUC; IUT; joint confidence region; order restrictive inference; Youden index; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; ROC CURVE; MARKERS; CUTOFF; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1002/pst.2099
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) serves as an overall measure of diagnostic accuracy. Another popular ROC index is the Youden index (J), which corresponds to the maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity minus one. Since the AUC and J describe different aspects of diagnostic performance, we propose to test if a biomarker beats the pre-specified targeting values of AUC(0) and J(0) simultaneously with H-0 : AUC <= AUC(0) or J <= J(0) against H-a : AUC > AUC(0) and J > J(0). This is a multivariate order restrictive hypothesis with a non-convex space in H-a, and traditional likelihood ratio-based tests cannot apply. The intersection-union test (IUT) and the joint test are proposed for such test. While the IUT test independently tests for the AUC and the Youden index, the joint test is constructed based on the joint confidence region. Findings from the simulation suggest both tests yield similar power estimates. We also illustrated the tests using a real data example and the results of both tests are consistent. In conclusion, testing jointly on AUC and J gives more reliable results than using a single index, and the IUT is easy to apply and have similar power as the joint test.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 674
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Estimating the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: Parametric and nonparametric ways
    Xu, Weichao
    Dai, Jisheng
    Hung, Y. S.
    Wang, Qinruo
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2013, 93 (11) : 3111 - 3123
  • [32] Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with verification biased data
    Hai, Yan
    Qin, Gengsheng
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (30) : 4789 - 4820
  • [33] Evidence Based Emergency Medicine; Part 5 Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve and Area under the Curve
    Safari, Saeed
    Baratloo, Alireza
    Elfil, Mohamed
    Negida, Ahmed
    EMERGENCY, 2016, 4 (02): : 111 - 113
  • [34] Multi-instance learning by maximizing the area under receiver operating characteristic curve
    Sakarya, I. Edhem
    Kundakcioglu, O. Erhun
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 2023, 85 (02) : 351 - 375
  • [35] Estimating the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve using partially ordered sets
    Zamanzade, Ehsan
    Wang, Xinlei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2021, 17 (01): : 139 - 152
  • [36] On the optimism correction of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in logistic prediction models
    Iparragirre, Amaia
    Barrio, Irantzu
    Xose Rodriguez-Alvarez, Maria
    SORT-STATISTICS AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH TRANSACTIONS, 2019, 43 (01) : 145 - 162
  • [37] The Extension of the Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve to Multi-class Problems
    Yang, Bo
    2009 ISECS INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION, CONTROL, AND MANAGEMENT, VOL II, 2009, : 463 - 466
  • [38] Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in diagnostic accuracy studies: A guide to interpreting the area under the curve value
    Corbacioglu, Seref Kerem
    Aksel, Goekhan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (04): : 195 - 198
  • [39] Confidence Intervals for the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in the Presence of Ignorable Missing Data
    Choi, Hunyong
    Matthews, Gregory J.
    Hare, Ofer
    INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2019, 87 (01) : 152 - 177
  • [40] Statistical inference for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of random measurement error
    Schisterman, EF
    Faraggi, D
    Reiser, B
    Trevisan, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 154 (02) : 174 - 179