Backbone flexibility in computational protein design

被引:80
|
作者
Mandell, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ]
Kortemme, Tanja [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Grad Program Bioinformat & Computat Biol, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Calif Inst Quantitat Biosci, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Bioengn & Therapeut Sci, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DEAD-END ELIMINATION; AMINO-ACID-SEQUENCE; SIDE-CHAIN; STRUCTURE PREDICTION; TEMPLATES; DIVERSITY; STABILITY; ALGORITHM; EVOLUTION; SPACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.copbio.2009.07.006
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The field of computational protein design has produced striking successes, including the engineering of novel enzymes. Many of these achievements employed methodologies that sample amino acid side-chains on a fixed backbone, while methods that explicitly model backbone flexibility have so far largely focused on the design of new structures rather than functions. Recent methodological improvements in conformational sampling techniques, some borrowed from the field of robotics to model mechanically accessible conformations, now provide exciting opportunities to explore amino acid sequences and backbone structures simultaneously. Incorporating functional constraints into flexible backbone design should help to achieve challenging engineering goals that exploit the role of conformational variability in controlling biological processes, while more generally advancing biophysical understanding of the relationship between variations in protein sequence, structure, dynamics, and function.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 428
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CATS (Coordinates of Atoms by Taylor Series): protein design with backbone flexibility in all locally feasible directions
    Hallen, Mark A.
    Donald, Bruce R.
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2017, 33 (14) : I5 - I12
  • [22] An increase in protein backbone flexibility upon binding a hydrophobic ligand
    Stone, MJ
    Zídek, L
    Lato, SM
    Ellington, AD
    Novotny, MV
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1999, 13 (07): : A1570 - A1570
  • [23] Challenges and Advantages of Accounting for Backbone Flexibility in Prediction of Protein-Protein Complexes
    Faruk, Nabil F.
    Peng, Xiangda
    Freed, Karl F.
    Roux, Benoit
    Sosnick, Tobin R.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2022, 18 (03) : 2016 - 2032
  • [24] Computational protein design for given backbone: recent progresses in general method-related aspects
    Liu, Haiyan
    Chen, Quan
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 39 : 89 - 95
  • [25] Simplified Computational Methods for the Analysis of Protein Flexibility
    Kuznetsov, Igor B.
    CURRENT PROTEIN & PEPTIDE SCIENCE, 2009, 10 (06) : 607 - 613
  • [26] Dead-end elimination with perturbations (DEEPer): A provable protein design algorithm with continuous sidechain and backbone flexibility
    Hallen, Mark A.
    Keedy, Daniel A.
    Donald, Bruce R.
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 81 (01) : 18 - 39
  • [27] Computational Protein Design Using Flexible Backbone Remodeling and Resurfacing: Case Studies in Structure-Based Antigen Design
    Correia, Bruno E.
    Ban, Yih-En Andrew
    Friend, Della J.
    Ellingson, Katharine
    Xu, Hengyu
    Boni, Erica
    Bradley-Hewitt, Tyler
    Bruhn-Johannsen, Jessica F.
    Stamatatos, Leonidas
    Strong, Roland K.
    Schief, William R.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2011, 405 (01) : 284 - 297
  • [28] The downside and upside of including backbone flexibility for predicting protein and antibody binding
    Faruk, Nabil F.
    Peng, Xiangda
    Roux, Benoit
    Sosnick, Tobin R.
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 121 (03) : 157A - 157A
  • [29] Computational protein design
    Albanese, Katherine I.
    Barbe, Sophie
    Tagami, Shunsuke
    Woolfson, Derek N.
    Schiex, Thomas
    NATURE REVIEWS METHODS PRIMERS, 2025, 5 (01):
  • [30] Computational protein design
    Kraemer-Pecore, CM
    Wollacott, AM
    Desjarlais, JR
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 5 (06) : 690 - 695