Bench Press Load-Velocity Profiles and Strength After Overload and Taper Microcyles in Male Powerlifters

被引:0
|
作者
Williams, Tyler D. [1 ,2 ]
Esco, Michael R. [2 ]
Fedewa, Michael V. [2 ]
Bishop, Phillip A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Samford Univ, Dept Kinesiol, Birmingham, AL 35229 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Dept Kinesiol, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
关键词
velocity-based training; athlete monitoring; resistance training; one-repetition maximum; INTENSITY; PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY; SQUAT; RESPONSES; VALIDITY; MACHINE; RPE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of an overload microcycle and taper on bench press velocity and to determine if the load-velocity relationship could accurately predict 1-repetition maximum (1RM). Twelve male powerlifters participated in resistance training structured into an introduction microcycle, overloadmicrocycle (PostOL), and taper (PostTP). At the end of eachmicrocycle, subjects completed a bench press for 1RM assessment consisting of warm-up sets at 40, 55, 70, and 85% of a previously established 1RM. The mean concentric velocity (MCV) was recorded during each warm-up set. A predicted 1RM (p1RM) was calculated using an individualized load-velocity profile (LVP). The average MCV decreased after PostOL (0.66 +/- 0.07 m.s(-1)) compared with baseline (BL) (rho = 0.003; 0.60 +/- 0.11 m.s(-1)) but increased after PostTP (0.67 +/- 0.09 m.s(-1)). One-repetition maximum increased from PostOL (146.7 +/- 19.8 kg) to PostTP (rho = 0.002; 156.1 +/- 21.0 kg), with no differences observed between other test sessions (rho > 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis indicated that p1RM was consistently higher than measured 1RM (3.4-7.8 kg), and the limits of agreement were extremely wide. However, very large to near perfect correlations (r = 0.89 to 0.96) were observed between p1RM and 1RM during BL, PostOL, and PostTP. The load-velocity relationship established from submaximal sets did not accurately predict 1RM, but MCV was affected by changes in weekly training loads. Velocity-based measurements seem to be more sensitive to changes in training loads than maximal strength.
引用
收藏
页码:3338 / 3345
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Precision of 7 Commercially Available Devices for Predicting Bench-Press 1-Repetition Maximum From the Individual Load-Velocity Relationship
    Perez-Castilla, Alejandro
    Piepoli, Antonio
    Garrido-Blanca, Gabriel
    Delgado-Garcia, Gabriel
    Balsalobre-Fernandez, Carlos
    Garcia-Ramos, Amador
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 2019, 14 (10) : 1442 - 1446
  • [22] Validity of the bench press one-repetition maximum test predicted through individualized load-velocity relationship using different repetition criteria and minimal velocity thresholds
    Perez-Castilla, Alejandro
    Fernandes, John F. T.
    Garcia-Ramos, Amador
    ISOKINETICS AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2021, 29 (04) : 369 - 377
  • [23] Influence of Grip Width on the Load-Velocity Relationship and 1 Repetition Maximum Value in the Bench Press Exercise: A Comparative and Reliability Analysis of Mean Velocity Vs. Mean Propulsive Velocity Vs. Peak Velocity
    Herrera-Bermudo, Jose Carlos
    Puente-Alcaraz, Carlos
    Diaz-Sanchez, Pablo
    Gonzalez-Badillo, Juan Jose
    Rodriguez-Rosell, David
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2024, 38 (12) : 2013 - 2021
  • [24] Changes in bench press performance and throwing velocity after strength-oriented and ballistic resistance training programs
    Cuevas-Aburto, Jesualdo
    Janicijevic, Danica
    Perez-Castilla, Alejandro
    Chirosa-Rios, Luis J.
    Garcia-Ramos, Amador
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 2020, 60 (11): : 1423 - 1430
  • [25] Changes in Bench Press Velocity and Power After 8 Weeks of High-Load Cluster- or Traditional-Set Structures
    Davies, Timothy B.
    Halaki, Mark
    Orr, Rhonda
    Helms, Eric R.
    Hackett, Daniel A.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2020, 34 (10) : 2734 - 2742