A two phase study to revise the Australian Practice Standards for Specialist Critical Care Nurses

被引:14
|
作者
Gill, Fenella J. [1 ,2 ]
Kendrick, Tina [3 ,4 ]
Davies, Hugh [2 ,5 ]
Greenwood, Melanie [6 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Hosp Children, Child & Adolescent Hlth Serv, Subiaco, WA, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Paramed, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[3] NSW Newborn & Paediat Emergency Transport Serv NE, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[5] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[6] Univ Tasmania, Sch Hlth Sci, Hobart, Tas, Australia
关键词
Competencies; Practice standards; Specialist; Intensive care; Critical care; Nursing; EDUCATION; DELPHI; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.aucc.2016.06.001
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Observational work to develop the ACCCN Competency Standards was undertaken more than 20 years ago. Since then the landscape of critical care nursing as a specialty has changed and it is not known if the Competency Standards reflected contemporary practice. Objectives: To revise the ACCCN Competency Standards for Specialist Critical Care Nurses to ensure they continue to meet the needs of critical care nurses and reflect current practice. Methods: A two-phased project was undertaken. In Phase I focus groups were held in all states. Thematic analysis was conducted using two techniques. The standards were revised based on the main themes. Phase II consisted of an eDelphi technique. A national panel of critical care nurses responded to three survey rounds using a 7 point likert-type scale to indicate their level of agreement with the revised standards. A 70% agreement level for each statement was determined a priori. Results: Phase I: 12 focus groups (79 participants) were conducted. Phase II: A panel of specialist critical care nurses (research, management, clinical practice and education) responded to round 1 (n = 64), round 2 (n = 56), and round 3 (n = 40). Fifteen practice standards with elements and performance criteria were grouped into four domains (professional practice, provision and coordination of care, critical thinking and analysis, collaboration and leadership). The revised Practice Standards for Specialist Critical Care Nurses build upon and are additional to the Nursing & Midwifery Board of Australia National Competency Standards for Registered Nurses. The standards reflect contemporary critical care nurse practices using an expanded range of technologies to care for complex critically ill patients across the lifespan in diverse settings. Conclusion: The national study has resulted in the 3rd edition of the Practice Standards for Specialist Critical Care Nurses. There was input from stakeholders and agreement that the revised standards capture contemporary Australian critical care nursing practice. (C) 2016 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 181
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and current practice of daily oral hygiene care to patients on acute aged care wards in two Australian hospitals
    Gibney, J.
    Wright, C.
    Sharma, A.
    Naganathan, V.
    SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY, 2015, 35 (06) : 285 - 293
  • [42] CRITICAL CARE NURSES' EXPERIENCES WITH SPIRITUAL CARE: THE SPIRIT STUDY
    Bone, Nigel
    Swinton, Marilyn
    Hoad, Neala
    Toledo, Feli
    Cook, Deborah
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 27 (03) : 212 - 219
  • [43] Research priorities for Australian critical care nurses: do we need them?
    Marshall, Andrea
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 17 (04) : 142 - 150
  • [44] EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE KEY TO MITIGATING ALARM FATIGUE IN AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE NURSES
    Vidyaeva, Meagan
    Hay, Benjamin
    Owens, Angela
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 37 : S19 - S19
  • [45] The practice of nurses working with older people in long term care: an Australian perspective
    Hunter, Sharyn
    Levett-Jones, Tracy
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2010, 19 (3-4) : 527 - 536
  • [46] The Influences on Practice in Social Care: An Australian Study
    Darracott, Rosalyn
    Lonne, Bob
    Cheers, Brian
    Wagner, Ingrid
    HUMAN SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP & GOVERNANCE, 2019, 43 (01) : 16 - 40
  • [47] Ethical Decision Making in Critical Care Communication, Coordination of Care, and the Practice of the Clinical Nurse Specialist
    Buhagiar, Teresa M.
    Schoenlein, Malcolm H.
    Smith, Deborah S.
    CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST, 2020, 34 (03) : 93 - 95
  • [48] Critical Care Nurses' Perceptions of Clinical Alarm Management on Nursing Practice
    Shih, Yu-Shan
    Lee, Ting-Ting
    Mills, Mary Etta
    CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2022, 40 (06) : 389 - 395
  • [49] Many critical care nurses are unaware of evidence-based practice
    Chester, Lori R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 16 (02) : 106 - 106
  • [50] NURSES' PERCEPTION OF RESIDENT AND ADVANCED PRACTICE PROVIDER CRITICAL CARE TEAMS
    Lunn, James
    Sandor, Peter
    Lavender, Zachary
    Roy, Cathy
    Grover, Prashant
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12)