Controversies about cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study of Roma women's (non)participation in cervical cancer screening in Romania

被引:33
|
作者
Andreassen, Trude [1 ,2 ]
Weiderpass, Elisabete [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Nicula, Florian [6 ]
Suteu, Ofelia [6 ,7 ]
Itu, Andreea [6 ]
Bumbu, Minodora [6 ]
Tincu, Aida [7 ]
Ursin, Giske [1 ,8 ]
Moen, Kare [2 ]
机构
[1] Canc Registry Norway, POB 5313, N-0304 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Tromso, Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Community Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Tromso, Norway
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Folkhalsan Res Ctr, Genet Epidemiol Grp, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Oncol Inst Prof Dr Ion Chiricuta Cluj Napoca, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[7] Univ Med & Pharm, Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[8] Univ Oslo, Inst Basic Med Sci, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Cervical cancer; Cervical cancer-screening; Roma; Romania; Participation; Controversies; Interessement; User involvement; EUROPEAN GUIDELINES; HEALTH; ASSURANCE; KNOWLEDGE; BARRIERS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.040
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Romania has Europe's highest incidence and mortality of cervical cancer. While a free national cervical cancer-screening programme has been in operation since 2012, participation in the programme is low, particularly in minority populations. The aim of this study was to explore Roma women's (non)participation in the programme from women's own perspectives and those of healthcare providers and policy makers. We carried out fieldwork for a period of 125 days in 2015/16 involving 144 study participants in Cluj and Bucharest counties. Fieldwork entailed participant observation, qualitative interviewing and focus group discussions. A striking finding was that screening providers and Roma women had highly different takes on the national screening programme. We identified four fundamental questions about which there was considerable disagreement between them: whether a free national screening programme existed in the first place, whether Roma women were meant to be included in the programme if it did, whether Roma women wanted to take part in screening, and to what degree screening participation would really benefit women's health. On the background of insights from actor-network theory, the article discusses to what degree the programme could be said to speak to the interest of its intended Roma public, and considers the controversies in light of the literature on patient centred care and user involvement in health care. The paper contributes to the understanding of the health and health-related circumstances of the largest minority in Europe, It also problematizes the use of the concept of "barriers" in research into participation in cancer screening, and exemplifies how user involvement can potentially help transform and improve screening programmes. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 55
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mammography and Cervical Cancer Screening - A Systematic Review about Women's Knowledge, Attitudes and Participation in Germany
    Dreier, M.
    Borutta, B.
    Toeppich, J.
    Bitzer, E. M.
    Walter, U.
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2012, 74 (11) : 722 - 735
  • [22] Knowledge about cervical cancer, Pap test, and barriers to women's participation in screening in Belgrade, Serbia
    Jovanovic, V.
    Jovanovic, A. Mitrovic
    Zivanovic, A.
    Kocic, S.
    Vasiljevic, M.
    Krsic, V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 38 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [23] Assessing participation of women in a cervical cancer screening program in Peru
    Robles, Sylvia C.
    Ferreccio, Catterina
    Tsu, Vivien
    Winkler, Jenny
    Almonte, Maribel
    Bingham, Allison
    Lewis, Merle
    Sasieni, Peter
    REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 25 (03): : 189 - 195
  • [24] Determinants of women's participation in cervical cancer screening trial, Maharashtra, India
    Nene, Bhagwan
    Jayant, Kasturi
    Arrossi, Silvina
    Shastri, Surendra
    Budukh, Atul
    Hingmire, Sanjay
    Muwonge, Richard
    Malvi, Sylla
    Dinshaw, Ketayun
    Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2007, 85 (04) : 264 - 272
  • [25] INDICATORS OF PARTICIPATION IN CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING AMONG ROMANY WOMEN
    Pakai, A.
    Kives, Horvathne Z.
    Szabo-Gabara, K.
    Olah, A.
    Boncz, I
    Csakvari, T.
    Karacsony, I
    Vadja, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A447 - A447
  • [26] A qualitative study of cervical cancer and cervical cancer screening awareness among nurses in Ghana
    Williams, Michelle S.
    Kenu, Ernest
    Dzubey, Isaac
    Dennis-Antwi, Jemima A.
    Fontaine, Kevin
    HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 39 (05) : 584 - 594
  • [27] Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women's perceptions of cervical cancer screening
    O'Donovan, B.
    Mooney, Therese
    Rimmer, Ben
    Fitzpatrick, Patricia
    Flannelly, Grainne
    Doherty, Lorraine
    Russell, Noirin
    Martin, Cara M.
    O'Leary, John J.
    Sharp, Linda
    O'Connor, Mairead
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2022, 25
  • [28] Providers' constructions of the role of women in cervical cancer screening in Bulgaria and Romania
    Todorova, Irina L. G.
    Baban, Adriana
    Balabanova, Dina
    Panayotova, Yulia
    Bradley, Janet
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 63 (03) : 776 - 787
  • [29] Non-participation in screening: The case of cervical cancer in Denmark
    Dugue, Pierre-Antoine
    Lynge, Elsebeth
    Bjerregaard, Beth
    Rebolj, Matejka
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 54 (3-4) : 266 - 269
  • [30] The truth about cervical cancer screening
    Rubenstein, Ian
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2018, 238 (3184) : 53 - 54