Combining Emergent Constraints for Climate Sensitivity

被引:21
|
作者
Bretherton, Christopher S. [1 ]
Caldwell, Peter M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
关键词
A method is proposed for combining information from several emergent constraints into a probabilistic estimate for a climate sensitivity proxy Y such as equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). The method is based on fitting a multivariate Gaussian PDF for Y and the emergent constraints using an ensemble of global climate models (GCMs); it can be viewed as a form of multiple linear regression of Y on the constraints. The method accounts for uncertainties in sampling this multidimensional PDF with a small number of models; for observational uncertainties in the constraints; and for overconfidence about the correlation of the constraints with the climate sensitivity. Its general form (Method C) accounts for correlations between the constraints. Method C becomes less robust when some constraints are too strongly related to each other; this can be mitigated using regularization approaches such as ridge regression. An illuminating special case; Method U; neglects any correlations between constraints except through their mutual relationship to the climate proxy; it is more robust to small GCM sample size and is appealingly interpretable. These methods are applied to ECS and the climate feedback parameter using a previously published set of 11 possible emergent constraints derived from climate models in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). The 62s posterior range of ECS for Method C with no overconfidence adjustment is 4.3 6 0.7 K. For Method U with a large overconfidence adjustment; it is 4.0 6 1.3 K. This study adds confidence to past findings that most constraints predict higher climate sensitivity than the CMIP mean. © 2020 American Meteorological Society;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0911.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
A method is proposed for combining information from several emergent constraints into a probabilistic estimate for a climate sensitivity proxy Y such as equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). The method is based on fitting a multivariate Gaussian PDF for Y and the emergent constraints using an ensemble of global climate models (GCMs); it can be viewed as a form of multiple linear regression of Y on the constraints. The method accounts for uncertainties in sampling this multidimensional PDF with a small number of models, for observational uncertainties in the constraints, and for overconfidence about the correlation of the constraints with the climate sensitivity. Its general form (Method C) accounts for correlations between the constraints. Method C becomes less robust when some constraints are too strongly related to each other; this can be mitigated using regularization approaches such as ridge regression. An illuminating special case, Method U, neglects any correlations between constraints except through their mutual relationship to the climate proxy; it is more robust to small GCM sample size and is appealingly interpretable. These methods are applied to ECS and the climate feedback parameter using a previously published set of 11 possible emergent constraints derived from climate models in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). The +/- 2 sigma posterior range of ECS for Method C with no overconfidence adjustment is 4.3 +/- 0.7 K. For Method U with a large overconfidence adjustment, it is 4.0 +/- 1.3 K. This study adds confidence to past findings that most constraints predict higher climate sensitivity than the CMIP mean.
引用
收藏
页码:7413 / 7430
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Causes of the weak emergent constraint on climate sensitivity at the Last Glacial Maximum
    Renoult, Martin
    Sagoo, Navjit
    Zhu, Jiang
    Mauritsen, Thorsten
    CLIMATE OF THE PAST, 2023, 19 (02) : 323 - 356
  • [32] On the Robustness of Emergent Constraints Used in Multimodel Climate Change Projections of Arctic Warming
    Bracegirdle, Thomas J.
    Stephenson, David B.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (02) : 669 - 678
  • [33] Assumptions for emergent constraints
    Brown, Patrick T.
    Stolpe, Martin B.
    Caldeira, Ken
    NATURE, 2018, 563 (7729) : E1 - E3
  • [34] Constraining the Emergent Constraints
    Jianhua Lu
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2020, 37 : 16 - 17
  • [35] Assumptions for emergent constraints
    Patrick T. Brown
    Martin B. Stolpe
    Ken Caldeira
    Nature, 2018, 563 : E1 - E3
  • [36] Constraining the Emergent Constraints
    Jianhua LU
    AdvancesinAtmosphericSciences, 2020, 37 (01) : 16 - 17
  • [37] CONSTRAINTS ON EMERGENT GRAVITY
    Jenkins, Alejandro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS D, 2009, 18 (14): : 2249 - 2255
  • [38] Constraining the Emergent Constraints
    Lu, Jianhua
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2020, 37 (01) : 16 - 17
  • [39] Observational constraints on the effective climate sensitivity from the historical period
    Tokarska, Katarzyna B.
    Hegerl, Gabriele C.
    Schurer, Andrew P.
    Forster, Piers M.
    Marvel, Kate
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (03)
  • [40] Ensemble reconstruction constraints on the global carbon cycle sensitivity to climate
    Frank, David C.
    Esper, Jan
    Raible, Christoph C.
    Buentgen, Ulf
    Trouet, Valerie
    Stocker, Benjamin
    Joos, Fortunat
    NATURE, 2010, 463 (7280) : 527 - U143