Combining Emergent Constraints for Climate Sensitivity

被引:21
|
作者
Bretherton, Christopher S. [1 ]
Caldwell, Peter M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
关键词
A method is proposed for combining information from several emergent constraints into a probabilistic estimate for a climate sensitivity proxy Y such as equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). The method is based on fitting a multivariate Gaussian PDF for Y and the emergent constraints using an ensemble of global climate models (GCMs); it can be viewed as a form of multiple linear regression of Y on the constraints. The method accounts for uncertainties in sampling this multidimensional PDF with a small number of models; for observational uncertainties in the constraints; and for overconfidence about the correlation of the constraints with the climate sensitivity. Its general form (Method C) accounts for correlations between the constraints. Method C becomes less robust when some constraints are too strongly related to each other; this can be mitigated using regularization approaches such as ridge regression. An illuminating special case; Method U; neglects any correlations between constraints except through their mutual relationship to the climate proxy; it is more robust to small GCM sample size and is appealingly interpretable. These methods are applied to ECS and the climate feedback parameter using a previously published set of 11 possible emergent constraints derived from climate models in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). The 62s posterior range of ECS for Method C with no overconfidence adjustment is 4.3 6 0.7 K. For Method U with a large overconfidence adjustment; it is 4.0 6 1.3 K. This study adds confidence to past findings that most constraints predict higher climate sensitivity than the CMIP mean. © 2020 American Meteorological Society;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0911.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
A method is proposed for combining information from several emergent constraints into a probabilistic estimate for a climate sensitivity proxy Y such as equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS). The method is based on fitting a multivariate Gaussian PDF for Y and the emergent constraints using an ensemble of global climate models (GCMs); it can be viewed as a form of multiple linear regression of Y on the constraints. The method accounts for uncertainties in sampling this multidimensional PDF with a small number of models, for observational uncertainties in the constraints, and for overconfidence about the correlation of the constraints with the climate sensitivity. Its general form (Method C) accounts for correlations between the constraints. Method C becomes less robust when some constraints are too strongly related to each other; this can be mitigated using regularization approaches such as ridge regression. An illuminating special case, Method U, neglects any correlations between constraints except through their mutual relationship to the climate proxy; it is more robust to small GCM sample size and is appealingly interpretable. These methods are applied to ECS and the climate feedback parameter using a previously published set of 11 possible emergent constraints derived from climate models in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). The +/- 2 sigma posterior range of ECS for Method C with no overconfidence adjustment is 4.3 +/- 0.7 K. For Method U with a large overconfidence adjustment, it is 4.0 +/- 1.3 K. This study adds confidence to past findings that most constraints predict higher climate sensitivity than the CMIP mean.
引用
收藏
页码:7413 / 7430
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Emergent constraints on climate sensitivity
    Martin Rypdal
    Hege-Beate Fredriksen
    Kristoffer Rypdal
    Rebekka J. Steene
    Nature, 2018, 563 : E4 - E5
  • [2] On the Emergent Constraints of Climate Sensitivity
    Qu, Xin
    Hall, Alex
    DeAngelis, Anthony M.
    Zelinka, Mark D.
    Klein, Stephen A.
    Su, Hui
    Tian, Baijun
    Zhai, Chengxing
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2018, 31 (02) : 863 - 875
  • [3] Emergent constraints on climate sensitivity
    Rypdal, Martin
    Fredriksen, Hege-Beate
    Rypdal, Kristoffer
    Steene, Rebekka J.
    NATURE, 2018, 563 (7729) : E4 - E5
  • [4] Evaluating Emergent Constraints on Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity
    Caldwell, Peter M.
    Zelinka, Mark D.
    Klein, Stephen A.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2018, 31 (10) : 3921 - 3942
  • [5] A Bayesian framework for emergent constraints: case studies of climate sensitivity with PMIP
    Renoult, Martin
    Annan, James Douglas
    Hargreaves, Julia Catherine
    Sagoo, Navjit
    Flynn, Clare
    Kapsch, Marie-Luise
    Li, Qiang
    Lohmann, Gerrit
    Mikolajewicz, Uwe
    Ohgaito, Rumi
    Shi, Xiaoxu
    Zhang, Qiong
    Mauritsen, Thorsten
    CLIMATE OF THE PAST, 2020, 16 (05) : 1715 - 1735
  • [6] Emergent constraints on climate sensitivities
    Williamson, Mark S.
    Thackeray, Chad W.
    Cox, Peter M.
    Hall, Alex
    Huntingford, Chris
    Nijsse, Femke J. M. M.
    REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2021, 93 (02)
  • [7] Emergent Scale Invariance and Climate Sensitivity
    Rypdal, Martin
    Fredriksen, Hege-Beate
    Myrvoll-Nilsen, Eirik
    Rypdal, Kristoffer
    Sorbye, Sigrunn H.
    CLIMATE, 2018, 6 (04):
  • [8] Progressing emergent constraints on future climate change
    Hall, Alex
    Cox, Peter
    Huntingford, Chris
    Klein, Stephen
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2019, 9 (04) : 269 - 278
  • [9] Progressing emergent constraints on future climate change
    Alex Hall
    Peter Cox
    Chris Huntingford
    Stephen Klein
    Nature Climate Change, 2019, 9 : 269 - 278
  • [10] A Test of Emergent Constraints on Cloud Feedback and Climate Sensitivity Using a Calibrated Single-Model Ensemble
    Wagman, Benjamin M.
    Jackson, Charles S.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2018, 31 (18) : 7515 - 7532