Benefits and limitations of noninvasive prenatal aneuploidy screening

被引:5
|
作者
Abel, David Eric [1 ]
Alagh, Amy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Fresno Branch, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fresno, CA 93701 USA
来源
JAAPA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS | 2020年 / 33卷 / 04期
关键词
aneuploidy; cell-free DNA; fetal fraction; mosaicism; placental apoptosis; trisomy; 21; CELL-FREE DNA; FREE FETAL DNA; MATERNAL PLASMA; POSITION STATEMENT; FRACTION; GESTATION; BLOOD; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/01.JAA.0000654208.03441.23
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The introduction of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is the newest option for aneuploidy screening during pregnancy. Compared with other aneuploidy screening options, NIPS offers a higher detection rate for trisomy 21 with a low false-positive rate. However, pretest and post-test patient counseling is essential and should include a discussion of the benefits and limitations, the screening rather than diagnostic nature of the test, and the association of a test failure with an increased risk of aneuploidy. Refer patients for genetic counseling when appropriate, particularly if test failure occurs due to a low fetal fraction or if maternal mosaicism or malignancy is suspected.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 53
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
    Gregg, Anthony R.
    Skotko, Brian G.
    Benkendorf, Judith L.
    Monaghan, Kristin G.
    Bajaj, Komal
    Best, Robert G.
    Klugman, Susan
    Watson, Michael S.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 18 (10) : 1056 - 1065
  • [42] Evaluating Expanded Noninvasive Prenatal Screening
    Dar, Pe'er
    Norton, Mary
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 140 (06): : 1078 - 1079
  • [43] Noninvasive Screening for Prenatal Diagnosis Foreword
    Dugoff, Lorraine
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 66 (03): : 534 - 535
  • [44] Noninvasive screening for prenatal genetic diagnosis
    Simpson, JL
    Bianchi, D
    Brambati, B
    Campbell, S
    DeLaCruz, F
    Elias, S
    Evans, M
    FergusonSmith, MA
    Golbus, M
    Holzgreve, W
    Jackson, L
    Katz, M
    Platt, L
    TimerTritsch, I
    Wald, N
    Zakut, H
    Boulyjenkov, V
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 1995, 73 (06) : 799 - 804
  • [45] Aneuploidy screening: Newer noninvasive test gains traction
    Nickolich, Sarah
    Farahi, Narges
    Jones, Kohar
    Mounsey, Anne
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2016, 65 (01): : 49 - 52
  • [46] Evaluating Expanded Noninvasive Prenatal Screening
    Bayefsky, Michelle J.
    Caplan, Arthur L.
    Hoskins, Iffath A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 (06): : 1009 - 1011
  • [47] Feasibility Study of Semiconductor Sequencing for Noninvasive Prenatal Detection of Fetal Aneuploidy
    Yuan, Yuan
    Jiang, Fuman
    Hua, Sang
    Du, Bole
    Hao, Yibin
    Ye, Lili
    Liu, Jiucheng
    Feng, Kaiyan
    Huang, Xinjie
    Yi, Xin
    Wang, Wei
    Yang, Ling
    Mu, Feng
    Liu, Caixia
    Liang, Yu
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 59 (05) : 846 - 849
  • [48] The influence of noninvasive prenatal testing on gestational age at time of termination for aneuploidy
    Connor, Sarah
    Reiff, Emily
    Dobson, Lori
    Bromley, Bryann
    Wilkins-Haug, Louise
    Bartz, Deborah
    Little, Sarah
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (01) : S256 - S256
  • [49] Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Aneuploidy Clinical Assessment and a Plea for Restraint
    Norton, Mary E.
    Rose, Nancy C.
    Benn, Peter
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (04): : 847 - 850
  • [50] DNA Sequencing Versus Standard Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening
    Bianchi, Diana W.
    Parker, R. Lamar
    Wentworth, Jeffrey
    Madankumar, Rajeevi
    Saffer, Craig
    Das, Anita F.
    Craig, Joseph A.
    Chudova, Darya I.
    Devers, Patricia L.
    Jones, Keith W.
    Oliver, Kelly
    Rava, Richard P.
    Sehnert, Amy J.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2014, 69 (06) : 319 - 321