Capture of stormwater runoff and pollutants by three types of urban best management practices

被引:5
|
作者
Karnatz, C. [1 ]
Thompson, J. R. [2 ]
Logsdon, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] ATC Grp Serv LLC, Environm Management, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Ecol & Management, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, USDA ARS, Natl Lab Agr & Environm, Ames, IA USA
关键词
bioretention cells; infiltration rates; infiltrometer; native landscaping; stormwater management; urban riparian buffers; WATER-QUALITY; RAINFALL INTENSITY; DENITRIFICATION; BIORETENTION; RESTORATION; PHOSPHORUS; RETENTION; NITRATE; SOIL; INFILTRATION;
D O I
10.2489/jswc.74.5.487
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Land cover changes associated with urbanization produce hydrological alterations, which often diminish infiltration, leading to increased runoff volumes, peak flows, and greater need for pollution control. A number of urban "green infrastructure" best management practices (BMPs) have been designed to capture and contain stormwater runoff near the source. Although implementation of such practices has slowly increased, lack of evidence about their effectiveness in reducing the quantity and improving the quality of stormwater runoff may still limit the degree to which they are implemented. The objectives of this study were to assess performance of three types of urban stormwater BMPs by measuring their soil characteristics, infiltration rates, runoff reduction, and water quality parameters compared to adjacent contributing areas. Three types of practices-bioretention cells, native landscaping (reconstructed prairie areas), and three-zone vegetated riparian buffers located in Ames and Ankeny, Iowa-were assessed by conducting infiltration tests and collecting soil and water samples. For the biocells in particular, practice surface areas were smaller in relation to their contributing areas than is recommended in current design criteria. On average, the bioretention cells and the buffers' wooded zones had significantly lower soil bulk densities, higher infiltration rates, and smaller runoff volumes than those of contributing areas.Time-to-runoff was particularly high for bioretention cells. Infiltration characteristics of the native landscapes (reconstructed prairie) and buffer prairie zones we studied were not significantly different from those of the contributing areas. Total extractable hydrocarbon concentrations were elevated in the bioretention cells, while metals such as chromium (Cr) had greater concentrations in the contributing areas. Based on these findings, we recommend careful attention to sizing, particularly for biocells, and suggest routine incorporation of soil amendments (such as compost) to improve the performance of reconstructed prairie areas. Our findings also suggest that more widespread implementation of these source-control measures in retrofit of existing developments and/or in the design of newly urbanizing areas will be effective for reducing stormwater runoff volumes and improving water quality.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 499
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A review of stormwater best management practices for karst areas
    Mccann, MS
    Smoot, JL
    HYDROGEOLOGY AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGY OF SINKHOLES AND KARST - 1999, 1999, : 395 - 398
  • [42] Retrofitting urban drainage systems using best stormwater management practices - Some Scandinavian experiences
    Mikkelsen, PS
    ENHANCING URBAN ENVIRONMENT BY ENVIRONMENTAL UPGRADING AND RESTORATION, 2004, 43 : 1 - 12
  • [43] Costs and benefits of capturing urban runoff with competitive bidding for decentralized best management practices
    Cutter, W. Bowman
    Baerenklau, Kenneth A.
    DeWoody, Autumn
    Sharma, Ritu
    Lee, Joong Gwang
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (09)
  • [44] Integrating better stormwater management practices in urban stormwater pollution modeling
    Mehler, R
    Ostrowski, M
    ADVANCES IN MODELING THE MANAGEMENT OF STORMWATER IMPACTS, VOL 6, 1998, 6 : 1 - 12
  • [45] An urban runoff model designed to inform stormwater management decisions
    Beck, Nicole G.
    Conley, Gary
    Kanner, Lisa
    Mathias, Margaret
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 193 : 257 - 269
  • [46] Urban Stormwater Management Model and Tools for Designing Stormwater Management of Green Infrastructure Practices
    Haris, H.
    Chow, M. F.
    Usman, F.
    Sidek, L. M.
    Roseli, Z. A.
    Norlida, M. D.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN RENEWABLE ENERGY AND TECHNOLOGIES (ICARET 2016), 2016, 32
  • [47] Planning of stormwater management with a new model for drainage best management practices
    Ristenpart, E
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 39 (09) : 253 - 260
  • [48] Runoff simulation of two typical urban green land types with the Stormwater Management Model (SWMM): sensitivity analysis and calibration of runoff parameters
    Xu, Zuxin
    Xiong, Lijun
    Li, Huaizheng
    Xu, Jin
    Cai, Xin
    Chen, Keli
    Wu, Jun
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2019, 191 (06)
  • [49] Runoff simulation of two typical urban green land types with the Stormwater Management Model (SWMM): sensitivity analysis and calibration of runoff parameters
    Zuxin Xu
    Lijun Xiong
    Huaizheng Li
    Jin Xu
    Xin Cai
    Keli Chen
    Jun Wu
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2019, 191
  • [50] Determination of best management timing of nonpoint source pollutants using particle bins and dimensionless time in a single stormwater runoff event
    Cha, Sun Min
    Lee, Seung Won
    Cho, Kyung Hwa
    Lee, Sun Hong
    Kim, Joon Ha
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 90 : 251 - 260