Multi-level abstraction for trace comparison and process discovery

被引:8
|
作者
Montani, Stefania [1 ]
Leonardi, Giorgio [1 ]
Striani, Manuel [2 ]
Quaglini, Silvana [3 ]
Cavallini, Anna [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Piemonte Orientale, Comp Sci Inst, DiSIT, Viale Michel 11, Alessandria, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Comp Sci, Corso Svizzera 105, Turin, Italy
[3] Univ Pavia, Dept Elect Comp & Biomed Engn, Via Ferrata 1, Pavia, Italy
[4] IRCCS Fdn C Mondino, Via Mondino 2, Pavia, Italy
关键词
Abstraction; Trace comparison; Process discovery; Stroke management; MANAGEMENT; RETRIEVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.063
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Many information systems record executed process instances in the event log, a very rich source of information for several process management tasks, like process mining and trace comparison. In this paper, we present a framework, able to convert activities in the event log into higher level concepts, at different levels of abstraction, on the basis of domain knowledge. Our abstraction mechanism manages non trivial situations, such as interleaved activities or delays between two activities that abstract to the same concept. Abstracted traces can then be provided as an input to an intelligent system, meant to implement a variety of process management tasks, significantly enhancing the quality and the usefulness of its output. In particular, in the paper we demonstrate how trace abstraction can impact on the quality of process discovery, showing that it is possible to obtain more readable and understandable process models. We also prove, through our experimental results, the impact of our approach on the capability of trace comparison and clustering (realized by means of a metric able to take into account abstraction phase penalties) to highlight (in)correct behaviors, abstracting from details. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 409
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hierarchical Deep Network for Group Discovery and Multi-level Activity Recognition
    Goyal, Ashish
    Bhargava, Neha
    Chaudhuri, Subhasis
    Velmurugan, Rajbabu
    ELEVENTH INDIAN CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION, GRAPHICS AND IMAGE PROCESSING (ICVGIP 2018), 2018,
  • [42] Making a Case for Multi-level Reference Modeling - A Comparison of Conventional and Multi-level Language Architectures for Reference Modeling Challenges
    de Kinderen, Sybren
    Kaczmarek-Hess, Monika
    INNOVATION THROUGH INFORMATION SYSTEMS, VOL III: A COLLECTION OF LATEST RESEARCH ON MANAGEMENT ISSUES, 2021, 48 : 342 - 358
  • [43] A Multi-level Level Generator
    Dahlskog, Steve
    Togelius, Julian
    2014 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND GAMES (CIG), 2014,
  • [44] Multi-level modelling via stochastic multi-level multiset rewriting
    Oury, Nicolas
    Plotkin, Gordon
    MATHEMATICAL STRUCTURES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2013, 23 (02) : 471 - 503
  • [45] Does multi-level intervention enhance work process knowledge?
    Leppanen, Anneli
    Hopsu, Leila
    Klemola, Soili
    Kuosma, Eeva
    JOURNAL OF WORKPLACE LEARNING, 2008, 20 (06) : 416 - 430
  • [46] Female informal entrepreneurship: conceptualizing a contextualized and multi-level process
    Zucchella, Antonella
    Kabbara, Diala
    Virtuani, Roberta
    JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT, 2025,
  • [47] Special Issue on Multi-Level Modeling Process Challenge Editorial
    Almeida, Joao Paulo A.
    Kuhne, Thomas
    Montali, Marco
    ENTERPRISE MODELLING AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURES-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 17 : 1 - 5
  • [48] Multi-level model for hydrodynamic circulation and dispersion process in bays
    Shibayama, Tomoya
    Leung, Pun K.
    Coastal Engineering in Japan, 1992, 35 (01):
  • [49] Multi-level implications of framing leadership perceptions as a dynamic process
    Foti, Roseanne J.
    Knee, Robert E., Jr.
    Backert, Rachel S. G.
    LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2008, 19 (02): : 178 - 194
  • [50] Children's Rights Implementation as a Multi-Level Governance Process
    Schapper, Andrea
    HUMAN RIGHTS QUARTERLY, 2017, 39 (01) : 104 - 129