Can do-it-yourself laboratories open up the science, technology, and innovation research system to civil society?

被引:16
|
作者
Lhoste, Evelyne F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gustave Eiffel, INRAE, UMR CNRS ESIEE Paris, Lab Interdisciplinaire Sci,Innovat,Soc,Cite Desca, F-77454 Marne La Vallee, France
关键词
Innovation studies; Actor network theory; Epistemic community; Knowledge brokers; Social innovation; INTERMEDIATION; COMMUNITIES; NETWORKS; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120226
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper deals with the potentialities for do-it-yourself (DIY) labs to open up the research and innovation system to citizen participation. DIY labs are spaces where academics and civil society stakeholders can gather to experiment with alternative research and innovation practices. I hypothesize that these collaborative practices are facilitated by intermediations. My results draw on the literature and on extensive field work in French DIY labs, also called fablabs, (bio)hackerspaces, makerspaces or third places. First, I discuss the relationship between DIY labs, epistemic communities and citizen participation. Second, I compare two situations of collaborative practices in maker communities. I show that managing the inclusion of non-experts in these technology-oriented communities requires a set of activities which need to be coordinated by an intermediary agent and are often distributed among community members. Third, I conclude that intermediations play a key role in transforming technology-centered into socio-centered DIY labs. In socio-centered set-ups, technical experts and practitioners from the groups concerned (users, patients, residents, etc.), collaborate thanks to intermediary agents. Intermediations are a pre-requisite for DIY labs to open up the research and innovation system to civil society.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [41] Real-World Use and Self-Reported Health Outcomes of a Patient-Designed Do-it-Yourself Mobile Technology System for Diabetes: Lessons for Mobile Health
    Lee, Joyce M.
    Newman, Mark W.
    Gebremariam, Achamyeleh
    Choi, Preciosa
    Lewis, Dana
    Nordgren, Weston
    Costik, John
    Wedding, James
    West, Benjamin
    Gilby, Nancy Benovich
    Hannemann, Christopher
    Pasek, Josh
    Garrity, Ashley
    Hirschfeld, Emily
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 19 (04) : 209 - 219
  • [42] Study on Explore China's New Employment Spaces Creation with the Social Society System Revolution through Science and Technology Innovation
    Ding MingLei
    Chen BaoMing
    Lv Yang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (2016 CCDC), 2016, : 1019 - 1024
  • [43] Open innovation for entrepreneurial opportunities: how can stakeholder involvement foster new products in science and technology-based start-ups?
    Iglesias-Sanchez, Patricia P.
    Fayolle, Alain
    Jambrino-Maldonado, Carmen
    De Las Heras-Pedrosa, Carlos
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (12)
  • [44] Can a new national system policy for science and technology promote industrial restructuring in China's national innovation center cities?
    Song, Zhendong
    Xu, Geni
    Jiao, Bing
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2024,
  • [45] An underwater color viewing system - What it can and will do (Reprinted from Marine Technology Society Journal, vol 12, 1978)
    Robinson, John
    MARINE TECHNOLOGY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2006, 40 (02) : 98 - 104
  • [46] Research on the Construction of Military and Civilian Integrated Collaborative Innovation System in Universities: A Case Study of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
    Zhang, Fan
    Yin, Lu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATION (ICSSHE 2019), 2019, 336 : 820 - 825
  • [49] Outside government science, 'not a single tiny bone to cheer us up!' The Geological Survey of Portugal (1857-1908), the involvement of common men, and the reaction of civil society to geological research
    Carneiro, A
    ANNALS OF SCIENCE, 2005, 62 (02) : 141 - 204