Development, performance evaluation, and clinical application of a Rapid SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG Test Kit based on automated fluorescence immunoassay

被引:9
|
作者
Kang, Keren [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Lingfang [1 ,2 ]
Ouyang, Chaolin [1 ,2 ]
Du, Jiaming [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Bin [1 ,2 ]
Chi, Yaqin [1 ,2 ]
He, Shuyu [1 ,2 ]
Ying, Le [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Guoling [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jihua [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Med Lab Technol Rapid Diagnost Engn Tec, Res Ctr, Guangzhou 510663, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co Ltd, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
automated detection; COVID-19; fluorescence immunochromatography; IgM and IgG; rapid antibody test; SARS-CoV-2; SARS-CORONAVIRUS; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1002/jmv.26696
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has made a huge impact on health, economies, and societies all over the world. Although reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based nucleic acid detection has been primarily used in the diagnosis of COVID-19, it is time-consuming with limited application scenarios and must be operated by qualified personnel. Antibody test, particularly point-of-care antibody testing, is a suitable complement to nucleic acid test as it provides rapid, portable, and cost-effective detection of infections. In this study, a Rapid Antibody Test Kit was developed based on fluorescence immunochromatography for the sensitive, accurate, and automated detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in human serum, plasma, and whole blood samples within 10 min. The sensitivity, specificity, precision, and stability of the test kit were of good performance. No cross-activity and no interference was observed. In the multiple-center parallel study, 223 samples from hospitalized patients were used to evaluate the clinical specificity of the test. Both SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG achieved a clinical specificity of 98.21%. The clinical sensitivities of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG were 79.54% and 87.45%, respectively, among 733 reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed SARS-CoV-2 samples. For the combined IgM and IgG assays, the sensitivity and specificity were 89.22% and 96.86%, respectively. Our results demonstrate that the combined use of IgM and IgG could serve as a more suitable alternative detection method for patients with COVID-19, and the developed kit is of great public health significance for the prevention and control of the COVID-19 pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:2838 / 2847
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On-field evaluation of a ultra-rapid fluorescence immunoassay as a frontline test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic
    Orsi, Andrea
    Pennati, Beatrice Marina
    Bruzzone, Bianca
    Ricucci, Valentina
    Ferone, Diego
    Barbera, Paolo
    Arboscello, Eleonora
    Dentone, Chiara
    Icardi, Giancarlo
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 295
  • [22] Comparison of a rapid immunochromatographic test with a chemiluminescence immunoassay for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG
    Gambino, Caterina Maria
    Lo Sasso, Bruna
    Colomba, Claudia
    Giglio, Rosaria Vincenza
    Agnello, Luisa
    Bivona, Giulia
    Ciaccio, Marcello
    BIOCHEMIA MEDICA, 2020, 30 (03) : 1 - 5
  • [23] Evaluation of two SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM Rapid Tests in Capillary Blood Samples
    Lee, Nan Young
    Ham, Ji Yeon
    Hwang, Narae
    Song, Kyung Eun
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2023, 69 (01) : 149 - 154
  • [24] Clinical validation of a second generation anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgM automated chemiluminescent immunoassay
    Pieri, Massimo
    Nuccetelli, Marzia
    Nicolai, Eleonora
    Sarubbi, Serena
    Grelli, Sandro
    Bernardini, Sergio
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (04) : 2523 - 2528
  • [25] Analytical performances of a chemiluminescence immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG and antibody kinetics
    Padoan, Andrea
    Cosma, Chiara
    Sciacovelli, Laura
    Faggian, Diego
    Plebani, Mario
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 58 (07) : 1081 - 1088
  • [26] Clinical validation of automated and rapid mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test
    Juha M. Koskinen
    Petri Antikainen
    Kristina Hotakainen
    Anu Haveri
    Niina Ikonen
    Carita Savolainen-Kopra
    Kati Sundström
    Janne O. Koskinen
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [27] Clinical validation of automated and rapid mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test
    Koskinen, Juha M.
    Antikainen, Petri
    Hotakainen, Kristina
    Haveri, Anu
    Ikonen, Niina
    Savolainen-Kopra, Carita
    Sundstrom, Kati
    Koskinen, Janne O.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [28] Clinical evaluation of a new COVID-19 antigen rapid test kit for detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Zhang, Wenjing
    Xu, Xiaoliang
    Qi, Liangshuai
    Liu, Mingkai
    Zhao, Xiaoying
    Kong, Lingshang
    Wang, Yingji
    Chen, Fengling
    Zhang, Chao
    Cheng, Jianghua
    Zheng, Weiwei
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2024, 108 (02)
  • [29] RAPID SEROLOGICAL TESTS FOR SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM - NOT WORTH ATTENTION?
    Krygier, Rafal
    Stepien, Piotr M.
    Zarebska-Michaluk, Dorota
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 34 (02) : 203 - 209
  • [30] Evaluation of A Rapid IgM-IgG Combined Antibody Test for SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Single Italian Center Study
    Margiotti, Katia
    Cupellaro, Marina
    Emili, Sabrina
    Mesoraca, Alvaro
    Giorlandino, Claudio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 16 (02) : 85 - 88