A Review of Faculty Self-Assessment TPACK Instruments (January 2006 - March 2020)

被引:12
|
作者
Scott, Kristin C. [1 ]
机构
[1] McNeese State Univ, Management, Lake Charles, LA 70605 USA
关键词
CFA; Data Set; EFA; Literature Review; Survey; Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge; Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Survey; Validity and Reliability; PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; PHYSICAL-EDUCATION TEACHERS; SCIENCE TEACHERS; PRESERVICE; FRAMEWORK; PERCEPTIONS; MATHEMATICS; TECHNOLOGY; VALIDATION; CONSTRUCTS;
D O I
10.4018/IJICTE.2021040108
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Since Mishra and Koehler released their framework of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), researchers have been attempting to measure it with a variety of self-assessment instruments. Early TPACK instruments struggled with construct validity. More recently, several instruments have been tested for validity and reliability successfully. Since 2006, 233 articles have been published that use a TPACK self-assessment survey of faculty in either a mixed method or empirical study. When faced with this abundance of literature, researchers may be overwhelmed when attempting to find a survey instrument suitable for their own studies. This review is designed to help researchers find valid and reliable instruments for their study by describing frequently used scales, an analysis of respondents from the identified studies, and reliability and validity studies associated with published instruments. A link to the entire data set Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Self-Assessment Survey Dataset (2006 - March 2020) is also provided.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 137
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of the structure oriented evaluation model for faculty members self-assessment
    Tudevdagva, Uranchimeg
    Lkhagvasuren, Bayar-Erdene
    2016 11TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON STRATEGIC TECHNOLOGY (IFOST), PTS 1 AND 2, 2016,
  • [22] Patient Assessment and Management Examination: lack of correlation between faculty assessment and resident self-assessment
    Schneider, Joseph R.
    Verta, Michael J., Jr.
    Ryan, Elizabeth R.
    Corcoran, Julia F.
    DaRosa, Debra A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 195 (01): : 16 - 19
  • [23] Efficiency and Cutoff Values of Self-Assessment Instruments on the Impact of a Voice Problem
    Behlau, Mara
    Madazio, Glaucya
    Moreti, Felipe
    Oliveira, Gisele
    Alves dos Santos, Luciana de Moraes
    Paulinelli, Bruna Rabelo
    Couto Junior, Euro de Barros
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2016, 30 (04) : 506.e9 - 506.e18
  • [24] UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' SELF-ASSESSMENT: LITERATURE REVIEW
    Kambourova, Miglena
    Gonzalez-Agudelo, Elvia Maria
    Grisales-Franco, Lina Maria
    TEORIA DE LA EDUCACION, 2021, 33 (02): : 217 - 264
  • [25] Self-Assessment of Surgical Skills: A Systematic Review
    Nayar, Sandeep K.
    Musto, Liam
    Baruah, Gautom
    Fernandes, Roland
    Bharathan, Rasiah
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 77 (02) : 348 - 361
  • [26] Radiology of the hands: Review and self-assessment module
    Chew, FS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (06) : S157 - S168
  • [27] Systematic Review of Self-Assessment in Physical Education
    Otero-Saborido, Fernando M.
    Torreblanca-Martinez, Victor
    Gonzalez-Jurado, Jose Antonio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (02) : 1 - 12
  • [28] Small Animal Imaging Self-Assessment Review
    Capper, Christie-Leigh
    CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE, 2019, 60 (07): : 756 - 756
  • [29] A Critical Review of Research on Student Self-Assessment
    Andrade, Heidi L.
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2019, 4
  • [30] Faculty feedback versus residents' self-assessment of operative performance: Different but complementary
    Tanoue, Nathan
    Korovin, Lev N.
    Carton, Melissa
    Galvani, Carlos A.
    Ghaderi, Iman
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 215 (02): : 288 - 292