The place of new grass pollen immunotherapy tablets for the management of patients with respiratory allergies in primary care

被引:2
|
作者
Hannachi, F. [1 ]
Demoly, P. [1 ,3 ]
Chiriac, A. M. [1 ,3 ]
Bourrain, J. -L. [1 ]
Dhivert-Donnadieu, H. [1 ]
Costa, D. [2 ,3 ]
Amouyal, M. [2 ,3 ]
Folco-Lognos, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Montpellier, Hop Arnaud de Villeneuve, Dept Pneumol & Addictol, Explorat Allergies, F-34295 Montpellier, France
[2] Univ Montpellier, Dept Med Gen, F-34000 Montpellier, France
[3] UPMC Paris 06, Univ Paris 04, UMR S 1136, IPLESP,Equipe EPAR, F-75013 Paris, France
来源
REVUE FRANCAISE D ALLERGOLOGIE | 2015年 / 55卷 / 08期
关键词
Allergen immunotherapy; Respiratory allergies; Primary care; General practice; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; MEDICAL-PRACTICE; RHINITIS; ASTHMA; RHINOCONJUNCTIVITIS; PREVALENCE; FRANCE; PERCEPTIONS; DIAGNOSIS; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.reval.2015.07.002
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. - New allergen immunotherapy (AJT) tablets are available to treat patients allergic to grass pollens. General practitioners (GPs) are at the forefront of the management of these common allergic diseases. Objective. - The aim of the study was to determine the percentage of patients who could benefit from AIT tablets and to evaluate GPs' perception, practice and information regarding AIT. Methods. - A questionnaire-based declarative electronic survey was conducted on 2000 GPs of Languedoc-Roussillon region from October to December 2014. Results. - A total of 429 physicians answered the questionnaire The response rate was 21.5%. Seventy percent of the GPs were treating 10 to 30% of their patients for respiratory allergies and less than 5% had already been treated by AIT. Most GPs (66%) stated that new treatments would be useful in more than 5% of these patients. While some of them had no opinion on AIT, the majority of GPs had a positive image of this treatment and considered it in accordance to the available recommendations. They provided a simple clinical follow-up with the help of the allergist, but 89% said they were not sufficiently informed about AIT. Conclusion. - The new AIT treatments do not have an important place in general practice because they are less known and used by primary care physicians. Allergen immunotherapy raises the interest of GPs, who have a positive perception of this treatment. Updated information and training in association with allergists could make a difference in the management of allergic diseases. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 516
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pharmacoeconomics of sublingual immunotherapy with the 5-grass pollen tablets for seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Lombardi C.
    Melli V.
    Incorvaia C.
    Ridolo E.
    Clinical and Molecular Allergy, 15 (1)
  • [22] Sustained 3-year efficacy of pre- and coseasonal 5-grass-pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablets in patients with grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis
    Didier, Alain
    Worm, Margitta
    Horak, Friedrich
    Sussman, Gordon
    de Beaumont, Olivier
    Le Gall, Martine
    Melac, Michel
    Malling, Hans-Jorgen
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 128 (03) : 559 - 566
  • [23] Efficacy and safety of 300IR 5-grass pollen sublingual allergen immunotherapy tablets in adult patients with grass-pollen rhinoconjunctivitis in United States
    Cox, L.
    Casale, T.
    Nayak, A.
    Bernstein, D.
    Mekhaldi, S.
    de Beaumont, O.
    Melac, M.
    Montagut, A.
    Creticos, P.
    ALLERGY, 2011, 66 : 63 - 63
  • [24] Efficacy and safety of 5-grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablets in patients with different clinical profiles of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
    Malling, H-J.
    Montagut, A.
    Melac, M.
    Patriarca, G.
    Panzner, P.
    Seberova, E.
    Didier, A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2009, 39 (03): : 387 - 393
  • [25] Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets for grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis in patients with or without mild asthma, mono- or polysensitised
    Malling, H.
    Melac, M.
    de Beaumont, O.
    Montagut, A.
    Didier, A.
    ALLERGY, 2007, 62 : 72 - 72
  • [26] Comparison of the effect of 5-grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablets and drops in children with rhinoconjunctivitis
    Jerzynska, Joanna
    Stelmach, Wlodzimierz
    Majak, Pawel
    Stelmach, Rafal
    Janas, Anna
    Stelmach, Iwona
    ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2018, 39 (01) : 66 - 73
  • [27] Methodological aspects of a meta-analysis of grass pollen allergen sublingual immunotherapy tablets Reply
    Di Bona, Danilo
    Plaia, Antonella
    Di Lorenzo, Gabriele
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 138 (01) : 315 - 317
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of 5-grass-pollen sublingual immunotherapy tablets in pediatric allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
    Wahn, Ulrich
    Tabar, Ana
    Kuna, Piotr
    Halken, Susanne
    Montagut, Armelle
    de Beaumont, Olivier
    Le Gall, Martine
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 123 (01) : 160 - 166
  • [29] Patient management in the sublingual immunotherapy of house dust mite respiratory allergies
    Trebuchon, F.
    David, M.
    Demoly, P.
    Robin, B.
    ALLERGY, 2011, 66 : 507 - 507
  • [30] Effectiveness of preseasonal allergoid immunotherapy in patients with grass pollen allergy
    Williams, AM
    Frank, E
    Meyer, H
    Cromwell, O
    Rajakulasingam, RK
    ALLERGY, 2002, 57 : 51 - 52