Different genetic alterations in rat forestomach tumors induced by genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens

被引:36
|
作者
Kaneko, M
Morimura, K
Nishikawa, T
Wanibuchi, H
Takada, N
Osugi, H
Kinoshita, H
Fukushima, S
机构
[1] Osaka City Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Abeno Ku, Osaka 5458585, Japan
[2] Osaka City Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg 2, Abeno Ku, Osaka 5458585, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1093/carcin/23.10.1729
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Human beings are exposed to a multitude of carcinogens in their environment, and most cancers are considered to be chemically induced. Here we examined differences in genetic alterations in rat forestomach tumors induced by repeated exposure to a genotoxic carcinogen, N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) or N-methylnitrosourethane (MNUR), and chronic treatment with a non-genotoxic carcinogen, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) or caffeic acid (CA). A total of 132, 6-week-old male F344 rats were employed. Forty rats were treated with MNNG by intragastric administration at a dose of 20 mg/kg body wt once a week for 32 weeks, and 20 rats received 20 p.p.m. MNUR in their drinking water for 48 weeks. Further groups of 20 animals were administered 2% BHA or 2% CA in the diet for 104 weeks. The remaining rats were maintained without any supplement as controls. Multiple forestomach tumors were observed in all rats of the MNNG-, MNUR-, BHA- and CA-treated groups. Histopathologically, MNUR- and CA-treated groups showed almost the same pattern. On polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism analysis, H-ras and p53 gene mutations were observed at high and relatively low frequencies, respectively, in forestomach tumors induced by MNNG and MNUR. Most H-ras gene mutations were G-->A transitions in codons 7 and 12 of exon 1. On the other hand, forestomach tumors due to the non-genotoxic carcinogens, BHA and CA, had almost no mutations of the H-ras and p53 genes. Moreover, relative overexpression of cyclin D1 and p53 was detected in forestomach tumors induced by the genotoxic carcinogens, while their non-genotoxic counterparts had a tendency to show low expression of those molecules. Mutations of the P-catenin gene were not detected in any group. The present study demonstrates that rat forestomach tumors induced by genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens have different underlying genetic alterations, even if their pathological features are similar.
引用
收藏
页码:1729 / 1735
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mesenchyme-derived factors enhance preneoplastic growth by non-genotoxic carcinogens in rat liver
    Marzieh Nejabat
    Teresa Riegler
    Tabea Reitinger
    Sandra Subosits
    Michael Römer
    Johannes Eichner
    Martin Bilban
    Andreas Zell
    Wolfgang W. Huber
    Rolf Schulte-Hermann
    Bettina Grasl-Kraupp
    Archives of Toxicology, 2018, 92 : 953 - 966
  • [42] Role of genotoxic and non-genotoxic mechanisms in furan carcinogenicity
    Chipman, Kevin
    Chen, Tao
    Hickling, Kevin
    Dekant, Wolfgang
    Mally, Angela
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 189 : S41 - S41
  • [43] A novel, integrated in vitro carcinogenicity test to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens using human lymphoblastoid cells
    Eleanor C. Wilde
    Katherine E. Chapman
    Leanne M. Stannard
    Anna L. Seager
    Katja Brüsehafer
    Ume-Kulsoom Shah
    James A. Tonkin
    M. Rowan Brown
    Jatin R. Verma
    Ann T. Doherty
    George E. Johnson
    Shareen H. Doak
    Gareth J. S. Jenkins
    Archives of Toxicology, 2018, 92 : 935 - 951
  • [44] Discrimination of genotoxic from non-genotoxic carcinogens by gene expression profiling (vol 25, pg 1265, 2004)
    van Delft, JHM
    van Agen, E
    van Breda, SGJ
    Herwijnen, MH
    Staal, YCM
    Kleinjans, JCS
    CARCINOGENESIS, 2004, 25 (12) : 2525 - 2525
  • [45] Cytokines in non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenesis
    Roberts, RA
    Kimber, I
    CARCINOGENESIS, 1999, 20 (08) : 1397 - 1401
  • [46] A novel, integrated in vitro carcinogenicity test to identify genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens using human lymphoblastoid cells
    Wilde, Eleanor C.
    Chapman, Katherine E.
    Stannard, Leanne M.
    Seager, Anna L.
    Brusehafer, Katja
    Shah, Ume-Kulsoom
    Tonkin, James A.
    Brown, M. Rowan
    Verma, Jatin R.
    Doherty, Ann T.
    Johnson, George E.
    Doak, Shareen H.
    Jenkins, Gareth J. S.
    ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 92 (02) : 935 - 951
  • [47] Discrimination of genotoxic from non-genotoxic carcinogens by gene expression profiling (vol 25, pg 1265, 2004)
    van Delft, JHM
    van Agen, E
    van Breda, SGJ
    Herwijnen, MH
    Staal, YCM
    Kleinjans, JCS
    CARCINOGENESIS, 2005, 26 (02) : 511 - 511
  • [48] Cytotoxicity and mitotic alterations induced by non-genotoxic lithium salts in CHO cells in vitro
    Pastor, Nuria
    Kaplan, Cigdem
    Dominguez, Inmaculada
    Mateos, Santiago
    Cortes, Felipe
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2009, 23 (03) : 432 - 438
  • [49] Epigenetic aspects of genotoxic and non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenesis: Studies in rodents
    Pogribny, Igor P.
    Rusyn, Ivan
    Beland, Frederick A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2008, 49 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [50] Detection of genotoxic and non-genotoxic renal carcinogens in vitro in NRK-52E cells using a transcriptomics approach
    Bloch, Katarzyna M.
    Yaqoob, Noreen
    Evans, Andrew
    Radford, Robert
    Jennings, Paul
    Boei, Jan J. W. A.
    McMorrow, Tara
    Slattery, Craig
    Ryan, Michael P.
    Gmuender, Hans
    van Delft, Joost H. M.
    Lock, Edward A.
    TOXICOLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 1 (03) : 211 - 219