Cost-benefit comparison of liraglutide and sitagliptin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Thailand

被引:2
|
作者
Deerochanawong, Chaicharn [1 ]
Kosachunhanun, Natapong [2 ]
Gadekar, Arvind V. [3 ]
Chotikanokrat, Pitthaporn [3 ]
Permsuwan, Unchalee [4 ]
机构
[1] Rangsit Univ, Rajavithi Hosp, Coll Med, Minist Publ Hlth, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Dept Med, Fac Med, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[3] Novo Nordisk Pharma Thailand Ltd, Bangkok 10500, Thailand
[4] Chiang Mai Univ, Dept Pharmaceut Care, Fac Pharm, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
来源
关键词
liraglutide; sitagliptin; diabetes; cardiovascular; Thailand; CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; WEIGHT-GAIN;
D O I
10.2147/CEOR.S201951
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: Liraglutide, a once-daily subcutaneous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist, is approved for treatment of hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). For patients with established cardiovascular diseases, liraglutide has also been shown to reduce major cardiovascular events. However, its cost is relatively higher than other oral antidiabetic drugs. This study aims to compare the costs and benefits of liraglutide vs sitagliptin, in treating T2DM in Thailand. Methods: This study consists of two parts. In part 1, the cost of keeping T2DM under control per patient (HbA1c<7.0% with no reported hypoglycemia and no body weight gain) with liraglutide (1.2 and 1.8 mg daily) was compared with using sitagliptin (100 mg daily). Costs were based on Thai local data. Clinical outcomes were based on head-to-head randomized controlled trials. Part 2 estimated the cost-per-controlled patient, based on major cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke). Economic benefit was calculated as the reduction in cardiovascular outcomes. Results: In Thailand, liraglutide (1.8 mg daily) costs 7.37-times more than sitagliptin 100 mg. The cost per patient achieving a composite clinical endpoint (HbA1c<7.0%, with no weight gain and no hypoglycemic events) in patients with T2DM receiving liraglutide 1.8 mg is 2.80-times higher than patients receiving sitagliptin 100 mg. When cardiovascular benefits (reduced composite endpoint of major cardiovascular events, ie, cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke) were taken into account, it was found that liraglutide had lower cost than sitagliptin, resulting in estimated savings of 20,085 THB (620 USD) per patient per year. Conclusion: The clinical benefits of liraglutide (HbA1c<7.0%, no hypoglycemia, no weight gain, reduced cardiovascular outcomes) partly offset its high price. Therefore, liraglutide should be considered as an appropriate treatment alternative to sitagliptin, particularly for T2DM patients with high cardiovascular risks.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 430
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF THE PROBIOTIC TREATMENT OF CHILDREN HOSPITALIZED FOR ACUTE DIARRHEA IN BANGKOK, THAILAND
    Phavichitr, Nopaorn
    Puwdee, Praewpun
    Tantibhaedhyangkul, Ruangvith
    SOUTHEAST ASIAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 44 (06) : 1065 - 1071
  • [22] Real-World Clinical Effectiveness and Cost Savings of Liraglutide Versus Sitagliptin in Treating Type 2 Diabetes for 1 and 2 Years
    Qian Li
    Rahul Ganguly
    Michael L. Ganz
    Cory Gamble
    Tam Dang-Tan
    Diabetes Therapy, 2018, 9 : 1279 - 1293
  • [23] In patients with type 2 diabetes, overall treatment satisfaction improves following a switch from sitagliptin to liraglutide treatment in combination with metformin
    Montanya Mias, E.
    Pratley, R.
    Nauck, M. A.
    Bailey, T.
    Garber, A.
    Filetti, S.
    Thomsen, A. B.
    Hammer, M.
    Davies, M.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2011, 54 : S322 - S323
  • [24] Real-World Clinical Effectiveness and Cost Savings of Liraglutide Versus Sitagliptin in Treating Type 2 Diabetes for 1 and 2 Years
    Li, Qian
    Ganguly, Rahul
    Ganz, Michael L.
    Gamble, Cory
    Tam Dang-Tan
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2018, 9 (03) : 1279 - 1293
  • [25] COST-BENEFIT IN TREATMENT OF MILD HYPERTENSION
    HARVALD, B
    CHRISTIANSEN, T
    PEDERSEN, KM
    RASMUSSEN, K
    STRATE, M
    THYGESEN, K
    ACTA MEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1984, : 81 - 87
  • [26] TREATMENT OF INCOMMENSURABLES IN COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    BRANDL, JE
    LAND ECONOMICS, 1968, 44 (04) : 523 - 525
  • [27] TREATMENT OF INCOMMENSURABLES IN COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    DEVINE, EJ
    LAND ECONOMICS, 1966, 42 (03) : 383 - 387
  • [28] Cost-benefit considerations in the treatment of schizophrenia
    Kissling, W
    Seemann, U
    NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 54 : 22 - 23
  • [29] The Investment Case for Malaria Elimination in Thailand: A Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Sudathip, Prayuth
    Kongkasuriyachai, Darin
    Stelmach, Rachel
    Bisanzio, Donal
    Sine, Jeffrey
    Sawang, Surasak
    Kitchakarn, Suravadee
    Sintasath, David
    Reithinger, Richard
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2019, 100 (06): : 1445 - 1453
  • [30] Sitagliptin (Januvia) for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes
    Whitley, Heather P.
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2007, 76 (06) : 861 - 862