Effects of CM/GC Project Delivery on Managing Process Risk in Transportation Construction

被引:19
|
作者
Farnsworth, Clifton B. [1 ]
Warr, Rebecca O. [1 ]
Weidman, Justin E. [1 ]
Hutchings, D. Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Construct Management, 230 SNLB, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
Project delivery; Risk management; Construction management; Project management; Contract management; Design; build; Contracting;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001091
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Teams that deliver complex transportation construction projects need tools that manage risk and allow for successful delivery. Construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC) project delivery is an alternative method that furnishes public agencies with an attractive option for delivering projects in a less adversarial and more constructive manner by involving the contractor during the design phase. This paper identifies the effects of CM/GC delivery on construction process risk. Owners, contractors, and design engineers with sizable CM/GC experience on transportation-related projects were surveyed to identify differences in the perception of CM/GC processes, especially compared to design-build and design-bid-build project delivery methods. The perceived benefits and disadvantages regarding quality, schedule, cost control, and collaboration/flexibility are discussed. The benefits include strategies for robust process risk management and successful project delivery, while the disadvantages expose barriers of implementation that must be overcome. Ultimately, this research identifies differences in how project teams value CM/GC processes with regard to minimizing construction process risk, thus enabling teams to more effectively facilitate unity and strengthen the CM/GC process. (C) 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Measuring project risk management process for construction contractors with statement indicators linked to numerical scores
    Kululanga, Grant
    Kuotcha, Witness
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 17 (04) : 336 - +
  • [42] Risk Prioritization in a Natural Gas Compressor Station Construction Project Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process
    Koulinas, Georgios K.
    Demesouka, Olympia E.
    Bougelis, Gerasimos G.
    Koulouriotis, Dimitrios E.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [43] Occupational safety risk analysis in construction sites based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A case study in a large construction project
    Soltanzadeh, Ahmad
    Mahdinia, Mohsen
    Jafarinia, Ehsan
    Golmohammadpour, Hamedeh
    Sadeghi-Yarandi, Mohsen
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2023, 76 (02): : 771 - 782
  • [44] Team Integration and Owner Satisfaction: Comparing Integrated Project Delivery with Construction Management at Risk in Health Care Projects
    Choi, Jiyong
    Yun, Sungmin
    Leite, Fernanda
    Mulva, Stephen P.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2019, 35 (01)
  • [45] Evaluation Research of the Thermal Power Engineering Project Construction Risk Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Zhao, Jian-Na
    Liu, Fei-Fan
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICAL AUTOMATION (ICEEMA 2015), 2015, : 375 - 379
  • [46] The Application of Fuzzy Synthesis Evaluation Method Based on The Analysis Network Process in Construction Project Risk Evaluation
    Yang Kaiyun
    Nie Qingpeng
    Zhang Ruiling
    EBM 2010: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-8, 2010, : 1936 - +
  • [47] Risk prioritisation using fuzzy analytic network process: A case of Addis-Djibouti railway construction project
    Gashaw, Tesfaye
    Jilcha, Kassu
    JOURNAL OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS, 2022, 29 (3-4) : 313 - 324
  • [48] Assessment of grid construction project risk of Process based on fuzzy-event tree-fault tree
    Li, Wei
    Ji, Yanjiao
    Shang, Yumin
    IEEC 2009: FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION ENGINEERING AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 393 - 397
  • [49] Leveraging the Value of Project Scope Growth through Construction Manager-at-Risk Delivery of Public University Capital Improvement Projects
    Gransberg, Nils J.
    Maraqa, Safa
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [50] Utility Coordination in Alternative Delivery Methods for Transportation Projects: Utility Responsibility Matrix and Design Development-Lessons Learned from Detailed Design Process and Construction
    Barrera, Juan Camilo
    Bodera, Tomasz
    PIPELINES 2021: DESIGN, 2021, : 31 - 38