Effects of CM/GC Project Delivery on Managing Process Risk in Transportation Construction

被引:19
|
作者
Farnsworth, Clifton B. [1 ]
Warr, Rebecca O. [1 ]
Weidman, Justin E. [1 ]
Hutchings, D. Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Construct Management, 230 SNLB, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
Project delivery; Risk management; Construction management; Project management; Contract management; Design; build; Contracting;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001091
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Teams that deliver complex transportation construction projects need tools that manage risk and allow for successful delivery. Construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC) project delivery is an alternative method that furnishes public agencies with an attractive option for delivering projects in a less adversarial and more constructive manner by involving the contractor during the design phase. This paper identifies the effects of CM/GC delivery on construction process risk. Owners, contractors, and design engineers with sizable CM/GC experience on transportation-related projects were surveyed to identify differences in the perception of CM/GC processes, especially compared to design-build and design-bid-build project delivery methods. The perceived benefits and disadvantages regarding quality, schedule, cost control, and collaboration/flexibility are discussed. The benefits include strategies for robust process risk management and successful project delivery, while the disadvantages expose barriers of implementation that must be overcome. Ultimately, this research identifies differences in how project teams value CM/GC processes with regard to minimizing construction process risk, thus enabling teams to more effectively facilitate unity and strengthen the CM/GC process. (C) 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk management process in construction project
    Liu Renhui
    Tai Shuangliang
    Zhao Qingjie
    Proceedings of 2006 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management, Vols 1 and 2: COLLABORATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE, 2006, : 843 - 846
  • [2] Modularization: managing project delivery risk in the time of COVID
    Villegas, Mauricio
    Loftus, Chris
    Chemical Engineering (United States), 2021, 128 (06): : 35 - 39
  • [3] Managing construction project risk with a safety documentation system
    Edgmond, J.G.
    Public Works, 2001, 132 (10):
  • [4] Integrated project delivery under state of Washington and Colorado CM/GC type contracts
    Schroeder, Greg (greg.schroeder@jacobs.com), 1600, Lean Construction Institute (2014):
  • [5] Project Delivery Method Performance for Public School Construction: Design-Bid-Build versus CM at Risk
    Carpenter, Noel
    Bausman, Dennis C.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 142 (10)
  • [6] Research on Risk Assessment in Project Construction Process
    She, Yuexia
    Song, Zhengrong
    Wu, Hang
    Liu, Chao
    Sun, Liwen
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FRONTIERS OF ENERGY, ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING (FEEMCE 2013), 2013, : 124 - 128
  • [7] Fall and Rise of the Largest Construction Manager-at-Risk Transportation Construction Project Ever
    Minchin, R. Edward, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2009, 135 (09): : 930 - 938
  • [9] Assessing Scope and Managing Risk in the Highway Project Development Process
    Le, Tiendung
    Caldas, Carlos H.
    Gibson, G. Edward, Jr.
    Thole, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 135 (09) : 900 - 910
  • [10] MANAGING RISK FOR SUCCESS IN A SOUTH AFRICAN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ENVIRONMENT
    Chihuri, S.
    Pretorius, L.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 21 (02) : 63 - 77