Route selection in multimodal transportation networks: a hybrid multiple criteria decision-making approach

被引:42
|
作者
Koohathongsumrit, Nitidetch [1 ]
Meethom, Warapoj [2 ]
机构
[1] Ramkhamhang Univ, Dept Stat, Fac Sci, Bangkok 2086, Thailand
[2] King Mongkuts Univ Technol North Bangkok, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Bangkok 1518, Thailand
关键词
Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making approach; analytic hierarchy process (AHP); data envelopment analysis (DEA); technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS); multimodal transportation;
D O I
10.1080/21681015.2020.1871084
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to propose a novel hybrid multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for route selection in multimodal supply chains. The proposed hybrid MCDM approach integrates the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), data envelopment analysis (DEA), and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) to address the problem based on quantitative and qualitative criteria. It utilizes the advantages of each approach, and can reconcile conflicting criteria and divergence of decision makers' judgments to select the most appropriate alternative as well as provide the preferred order of the multimodal routes. Furthermore, an empirical route selection between Thailand and Vietnam is applied to validate the abilities of the proposed hybrid MCDM approach. The new methodological contribution of this study assists decision makers and transport policymakers to design an effective decision support tool for solving transportation and logistical problems in real-world decision-making processes.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 185
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for offshore wind turbine selection
    Ma, Yuanxing
    Xu, Li
    Cai, Jingjing
    Cao, Jing
    Zhao, Fengfeng
    Zhang, Jiaying
    WIND ENGINEERING, 2021, 45 (05) : 1273 - 1295
  • [22] Optimizing Multimodal Transportation: A Novel Decision-Making Approach With Fuzzy Risk Assessment
    Muthunandhini, R.
    Palanivel, K.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2025, 13 : 14584 - 14610
  • [23] A RISK MANAGEMENT MODEL FOR FMS SELECTION DECISIONS - A MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH
    KUULA, M
    COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 1993, 23 (1-2) : 99 - 108
  • [24] WEIGHTED MAXIMIN AND MAXIMAX APPROACH TO MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    PEARMAN, AD
    OPERATIONAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1977, 28 (03) : 584 - 587
  • [25] ON THE PROBLEM OF WEIGHTS IN MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING (THE NONCOMPENSATORY APPROACH)
    VANSNICK, JC
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) : 288 - 294
  • [26] IMPLEMENTING FLEXIBLE AUTOMATION - A MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH
    LOTFI, V
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1995, 38 (2-3) : 255 - 268
  • [27] Integrated Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Method to Prioritize Transportation Projects
    Shelton, Jeffrey
    Medina, Michael
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2174) : 51 - 57
  • [28] A multiple-criteria decision-making model for the selection of a hotel location
    Popovic, Gabrijela
    Stanujkic, Dragisa
    Brzakovic, Miodrag
    Karabasevic, Darjan
    LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 84 : 49 - 58
  • [29] Application of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Assignment Place Selection
    Soba, Mustafa
    Ersoy, Yusuf
    Altinay, Aysenur Tarakcioglu
    Erkan, Birol
    Sik, Eser
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [30] Systematic failure mode and effect analysis using a hybrid multiple criteria decision-making approach
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    You, Jian-Xin
    Shan, Meng-Meng
    Su, Qiang
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2019, 30 (5-6) : 537 - 564