Biomechanical Comparison of Five Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques

被引:26
|
作者
Nuelle, Clayton W. [1 ,2 ]
Milles, Jeffrey L. [1 ]
Pfeiffer, Ferris M. [1 ,2 ]
Stannard, James P. [1 ,2 ]
Smith, Patrick A. [1 ,3 ]
Kfuri, Mauricio, Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Cook, James L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Columbia, MO USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Thompson Lab Regenerat Orthopaed, Columbia, MO USA
[3] Columbia Orthopaed Grp, Columbia, MO USA
关键词
posterior cruciate ligament; autograft; allograft; reconstruction techniques; biomechanics; DOUBLE-BUNDLE RECONSTRUCTION; TIBIAL INLAY; SINGLE-BUNDLE; SURGICAL-TECHNIQUE; GRAFT FIXATION; KNEE LAXITY; PART;
D O I
10.1055/s-0036-1593625
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
No surgical technique recreates native posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) biomechanics. We compared the biomechanics of five different PCL reconstruction techniques versus the native PCL. Cadaveric knees (n = 20) were randomly assigned to one of five reconstruction techniques: Single bundle all-inside arthroscopic inlay, single bundle all-inside suspensory fixation, single bundle arthroscopic-assisted open onlay (SB-ONL), double bundle arthroscopic-assisted open inlay (DB-INL), and double bundle all-inside suspensory fixation (DB-SUSP). Each specimen was potted and connected to a servo-hydraulic load frame for testing in three conditions: PCL intact, PCL deficient, and PCL reconstructed. Testing consisted of a posterior force up to 100 N at a rate of 1 N/s at four knee flexion angles: 10, 30, 60, and 90 degrees. Three material properties were measured under each condition: load to 5 mm displacement, maximal displacement, and stiffness. Data were normalized to the native PCL, compared across techniques, compared with all PCL-intact knees and to all PCL-deficient knees using one-way analysis of variance. For load to 5 mm displacement, intact knees required significantly (p < 0.03) more load at 30 degrees of flexion than all reconstructions except the DB-SUSP. At 60 degrees of flexion, intact required significantly (p < 0.01) more load than all others except the SB-ONL. At 90 degrees, intact, SB-ONL, DB-INL, and DB-SUSP required significantly more load (p < 0.05). Maximal displacement testing showed the intact to have significantly (p < 0.02) less laxity than all others except the DB-INL and DB-SUSP at 60 degrees. At 90 degrees the intact showed significantly (p < 0.01) less laxity than all others except the DB-SUSP. The intact was significantly stiffer than all others at 30 degrees (p < 0.03) and 60 degrees (p < 0.01). Finally, the intact was significantly (p < 0.05) stiffer than all others except the DB-SUSP at 90 degrees. No technique matched the exact properties of the native PCL, but the double bundle reconstructions more closely recreated the native biomechanics immediately after implantation, with the DB-SUSP coming closest to the native ligament. This study contributes new data for consideration in PCL reconstruction technique choice.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 531
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Transtibial or Tibial Inlay Techniques A Meta-analysis of Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes
    Lee, Dong-Yeong
    Kim, Dong-Hee
    Kim, Hyun-Jung
    Ahn, Hyeong-Sik
    Lee, Tae-Ho
    Hwang, Sun-Chul
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (11): : 2789 - 2797
  • [32] Testing for isometry during reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament - Anatomic and biomechanical considerations
    Covey, DC
    Sapega, AA
    Sherman, GM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (06): : 740 - 746
  • [33] Biomechanical Evaluation of an Anatomic Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Tsukada, Harehiko
    Ishibashi, Yasuyuki
    Tsuda, Eiichi
    Fukuda, Akira
    Yamamoto, Yuji
    Toh, Satoshi
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2012, 28 (02): : 264 - 271
  • [34] ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION - A COMPARISON OF 2 TECHNIQUES
    SPECCHIULLI, F
    LAFORGIA, R
    MOCCI, A
    MIOLLA, L
    SCIALPI, L
    SOLARINO, G
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1995, (311) : 142 - 147
  • [35] POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION •• ARE THE RESULTS SIMILAR TO ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION?
    Mestriner, Marcos Barbieri
    Hirosse, Fabio Eidi
    dos Anjos Rabelo, Nayra Deise
    dos Santos Netto, Alfredo
    de Oliveira, Victor Marques
    de Paula Leite Cury, Ricardo
    ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2023, 31 (02):
  • [36] Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: A clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques
    Seon, JK
    Song, EK
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (01): : 27 - 32
  • [37] Biomechanical Properties of Different Fixation Techniques for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures
    Domnick, Christoph
    Koesters, Clemens
    Franke, Friederike
    Raschke, Michael J.
    Petersen, Wolf
    Fink, Christian
    Herbort, Mirco
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (06): : 1065 - 1071
  • [38] Biomechanical comparison of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction techniques
    Ruland, Robert T.
    Hogan, Christopher J.
    Randall, Craig J.
    Richards, Andrew
    Belkoff, Stephen M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (08): : 1565 - 1570
  • [39] Finite element analysis of different posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques
    Qi, Y. S.
    Yu, J. K.
    Zhang, X. J.
    Hu, L.
    Xu, Y. S.
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2018, 123 : 9 - 10
  • [40] Biomechanical Comparison of Anterolateral Procedures Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Inderhaug, Eivind
    Stephen, Joanna M.
    Williams, Andy
    Amis, Andrew A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (02): : 347 - 354