Sepsis Induces Physical and Mental Impairments in a Mouse Model of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome

被引:10
|
作者
Fujinami, Yoshihisa [1 ]
Inoue, Shigeaki [1 ]
Ono, Yuko [1 ]
Miyazaki, Yusuke [1 ]
Fujioka, Kazumichi [2 ]
Yamashita, Kimihiro [3 ]
Kotani, Joji [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Dept Disaster & Emergency & Crit Care Med, Grad Sch Med, Kobe, Hyogo 6500017, Japan
[2] Kobe Univ, Div Gastrointestinal Surg, Dept Surg, Grad Sch Med, Kobe, Hyogo 6500017, Japan
[3] Kobe Univ, Dept Pediat, Grad Sch Med, Kobe, Hyogo 6500017, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
post-intensive care syndrome; physical impairments; cognitive impairment; mental impairment; sepsis; survivor; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; MICE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm10081593
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) is a physical, cognitive, and mental impairment observed in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors. Although this is an emerging problem in the ICU, how sepsis induces the characteristic symptoms of PICS remains unclear. To develop a model of PICS, we induced sepsis in male C57/B6 mice via sublethal cecum slurry injection and subsequently treated them using ICU-like interventions. At 1-2 weeks post-sepsis induction, we simultaneously evaluated the abilities of the surviving mice using the following behavioral tests: (1) a grip strength test (GST) and a treadmill test for physical assessment, (2) a novel object recognition test (NORT) for cognitive assessment, and (3) an open field test (OFT) and a marble burying test (MBT) for mental assessment. The surviving mice showed a range of deficits, including muscle weakness with significantly decreased grip strength in the GST; decreased total mileage during the treadmill test; anxiety and decreased activity, with significantly decreased time in the central area, and increased duration of immobility in the OFT; and an increased number of buried marbles in the MBT. Given these physical and mental impairments in the surviving mice, our model has the potential to elucidate mechanistic insights and to discover therapeutic targets and new interventions for PICS.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Post-intensive care syndrome: A concept analysis
    Yuan, Chu
    Timmins, Fiona
    Thompson, David R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2021, 114
  • [22] The paradox of post-intensive care unit physical therapy
    Sharshar, Tarek
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 50 (08) : 1388 - 1389
  • [23] Early Post-Intensive Care Syndrome among Older Adult Sepsis Survivors Receiving Home Care
    Riegel, Barbara
    Huang, Liming
    Mikkelsen, Mark E.
    Kutney-Lee, Ann
    Hanlon, Alexandra L.
    Murtaugh, Christopher M.
    Bowles, Kathryn H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2019, 67 (03) : 520 - 526
  • [24] Critical Care Clinicians' Knowledge of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome
    Lobos, Patricia G.
    Nairon, Emerson B.
    Denbow, Maria
    Olson, DaiWai M.
    Wilson, Jennifer E.
    AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 35 (04)
  • [25] Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS): recent updates
    Hiser, Stephanie L. L.
    Fatima, Arooj
    Ali, Mazin
    Needham, Dale M. M.
    JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2023, 11 (01)
  • [26] Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: A Look at PICU Outcomes
    Biagas, Katherine V.
    Hough, Rebecca F.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (11) : 1101 - 1101
  • [27] Post-intensive care syndrome: survival, but at what cost?
    Sampson, Caroline
    ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 79 (07) : 689 - 693
  • [28] Medication Management to Ameliorate Post-Intensive Care Syndrome
    Stollings, Joanna L.
    Bloom, Sarah L.
    Huggins, Elizabeth L.
    Grayson, Scottie L.
    Jackson, James C.
    Sevin, Carla M.
    AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 27 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [29] Post-intensive care syndrome: A review for the primary care NP
    Dunn, Heather
    Balas, Michele C.
    Hetland, Breanna
    Krupp, Anna
    NURSE PRACTITIONER, 2022, 47 (11): : 15 - 22
  • [30] Post-intensive care syndrome Screening and management in primary care
    Berger, Pierre
    Braude, David
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2021, 50 (10) : 737 - 740