Biased attention to threat and anxiety: On taking a developmental approach

被引:29
|
作者
Burris, Jessica L. [1 ]
Buss, Kristin [2 ]
LoBue, Vanessa [3 ]
Perez-Edgar, Koraly [4 ,5 ]
Field, Andy P. [6 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Newark, NJ USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Psychol & Human Dev & Family Studies, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Psychol, Newark, NJ USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Child Studies, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[5] Penn State Univ, Psychol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[6] Univ Sussex, Quantitat Methods, Brighton, E Sussex, England
来源
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOPATHOLOGY | 2019年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
anxiety; attention to threat; development; attention bias; INFORMATION-PROCESSING BIASES; DOT-PROBE TASK; BEHAVIORAL-INHIBITION; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; COGNITIVE BIAS; FEARFUL FACES; EYE-TRACKING; TEMPERAMENTAL CONTRIBUTIONS;
D O I
10.1177/2043808719860717
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Several researchers have proposed a causal relation between biased attention to threat and the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders in both children and adults. However, despite the widely documented correlation between attention bias to threat and anxiety, developmental research in this domain is limited. In this review, we highlight the importance of taking a developmental approach to studying attention biases to threat and anxiety. First, we discuss how recent developmental work on attention to threat fits into existing theoretical frameworks for the development of anxiety and how attention biases might interact with other risk factors across development. Then we review the developmental literature on attention bias to threat and anxiety and describe how classic methodologies can be modified to study attention biases in even the youngest infants. Finally, we discuss limitations and future directions in this domain, emphasizing the need for future longitudinal research beginning in early infancy that tracks concurrent developments in both biased attention and anxiety. Altogether, we hope that by highlighting the importance of development in the study of attention bias to threat and anxiety, we can provide a road map for how researchers might implement developmental approaches to studying a potential core mechanism in anxiety.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Threat and Defense: From Anxiety to Approach
    Jonas, Eva
    McGregor, Ian
    Klackl, Johannes
    Agroskin, Dmitrij
    Fritsche, Immo
    Holbrook, Colin
    Nash, Kyle
    Proulx, Travis
    Quirin, Markus
    ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 49, 2014, 49 : 219 - 286
  • [22] A developmental angle to understanding the mechanisms of biased cognitions in social anxiety
    Haller, Simone P. W.
    Kadosh, Kathrin Cohen
    Lau, Jennifer Y. F.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 7
  • [23] BIASED ATTENTION IN CHILDHOOD ANXIETY DISORDERS - A PRELIMINARY-STUDY
    VASEY, MW
    DALEIDEN, EL
    WILLIAMS, LL
    BROWN, LM
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 23 (02) : 267 - 279
  • [24] A DEVELOPMENTAL-APPROACH TO ANXIETY
    NICKEL, HJ
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1961, 16 (07) : 402 - 402
  • [25] Generalized Anxiety Disorder, worry and attention to threat: A systematic review
    Goodwin, Huw
    Yiend, Jenny
    Hirsch, Colette R.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2017, 54 : 107 - 122
  • [26] Physical abuse amplifies attention to threat and increases anxiety in children
    Shackman, Jessica E.
    Shackman, Alexander J.
    Pollak, Seth D.
    EMOTION, 2007, 7 (04) : 838 - 852
  • [27] Difficulty Disengaging Attention from Social Threat in Social Anxiety
    Julia D. Buckner
    Jon K. Maner
    Norman B. Schmidt
    Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2010, 34 : 99 - 105
  • [28] Selective orienting of attention to masked threat faces in social anxiety
    Mogg, K
    Bradley, BP
    BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2002, 40 (12) : 1403 - 1414
  • [29] Selective attention to threat: A test of two cognitive models of anxiety
    Mogg, K
    McNamara, J
    Powys, M
    Rawlinson, H
    Seiffer, A
    Bradley, BP
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2000, 14 (03) : 375 - 399
  • [30] Anxiety and selective attention to threat in tactical decision-making
    Matthews, Gerald
    Panganiban, April Rose
    Hudlicka, Eva
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 50 (07) : 949 - 954