Low correlation of serology with detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction and antigen E1A

被引:18
|
作者
Rabenau, HF
Köhler, E
Peters, M
Doerr, HW
Weber, B
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Inst Med Virol, D-60596 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Ctr Langwies, Labs Reunis Kutter Lieners Harstert, L-6131 Junglinster, Luxembourg
[3] Board Hlth Frankfurt, D-60331 Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
ligase chain reaction; Chlamydia trachomatis-specific antibody; lower genital tract infection; upper genital tract infection; female sex workers;
D O I
10.1007/s150100050054
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serology by using new assays for the detection of gen us a nd species-specific IgG, IgM, IgA and secretory IgA antibody in female sex workers, Cervical swabs and first void urine (FVU) from 314 female sex workers were submitted to nucleic acid amplification by ligase chain reaction (LCx, Abbott). Concomittantly, blood samples were tested for the presence of IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies using a genus-specific assay (rELISA, Medac) and species-specific test (SeroCT, Orgenics). Chlamydia trachomatis infection was detected in a total of 30 (9.6%) female sex workers by LCR. With rELISA, seroprevalences for IgG, IgM, and IgA antibody to Chlamydia were 88.9%, 19.1% and 62.7%, respectively. IgG and IgA antibody prevalences against C. trachomatis (SeroCT) were 65.0% and 23.9%, respectively. In comparison to the positive LCR results obtained from cervical swab and/or FVU, the sensitivity of rELISA for Chlamydia IgG, IgA and IgM detection was 93.3%, 83.3% and 16.7%, respectively. With SeroCT, the sensitivity for C. trachomatis-specific IgG and IgA detection was 86.7% and 33.3%, respectively. The specificities of both serologic tests in comparison to LCR were very low. In conclusion, the correlation of serology with active C. trachomatis infection of the lower genital tract is very low. According to our results, serologic testing for Chlamydia can exclude active infection of the lower genital tract with a high reliability (greater than or equal to 95%). However, detection of C, trachomatis can only be reliably achieved by nucleic acid amplification assays.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 102
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The in situ polymerase chain reaction for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis
    Schlott, T
    Ruda, G
    Hoppert, M
    Nagel, H
    Reimer, S
    Schumacher-Lütge, IK
    Droese, M
    JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 46 (09) : 1017 - 1023
  • [22] Pilot study of COBAS PCR and ligase chain reaction for detection of rectal infections due to Chlamydia trachomatis
    Golden, MR
    Astete, SG
    Galvan, R
    Lucchetti, A
    Sanchez, J
    Celum, CL
    Whittington, WLH
    Stamm, WE
    Holmes, KK
    Totten, PA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (05) : 2174 - 2175
  • [23] LIGASE CHAIN-REACTION TO DETECT CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS INFECTION OF THE CERVIX
    SCHACHTER, J
    STAMM, WE
    QUINN, TC
    ANDREWS, WW
    BURCZAK, JD
    LEE, HH
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (10) : 2540 - 2543
  • [24] The inhibitory effect of phosphate on the ligase chain reaction used for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis
    Notomi, T
    Ikeda, Y
    Okadome, A
    Nagayama, A
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 51 (04) : 306 - 308
  • [25] DETECTION OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS INFECTION IN URINE SAMPLES FROM MEN AND WOMEN BY LIGASE CHAIN-REACTION
    VANDOORNUM, GJJ
    BUIMER, M
    PRINS, M
    HENQUET, CJM
    COUTINHO, RA
    PLIER, PK
    TOMAZICALLEN, S
    HU, H
    LEE, H
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 33 (08) : 2042 - 2047
  • [26] Comparison of a ligase chain reaction-based assay and cell culture for detection of pharyngeal carriage of Chlamydia trachomatis
    Winter, AJ
    Gilleran, G
    Eastick, K
    Ross, JDC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (09) : 3502 - 3504
  • [27] Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary medicine clinic attendees:: comparison of strand displacement amplification and the ligase chain reaction
    McCartney, RA
    Walker, J
    Scoular, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 58 (04) : 235 - 238
  • [28] DETECTION OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS BY THE POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION
    GRIFFAIS, R
    THIBON, M
    RESEARCH IN MICROBIOLOGY, 1989, 140 (02) : 139 - 141
  • [29] Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in conjunctival swabs
    Elnifro, EM
    Storey, CC
    Morris, DJ
    Tullo, AB
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 81 (06) : 497 - 500
  • [30] DETECTION OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS BY LIGASE CHAIN-REACTION COMPARED WITH POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION AND CELL-CULTURE IN UROGENITAL SPECIMENS
    DEBARBEYRAC, B
    RODRIGUEZ, P
    DUTILH, B
    LEROUX, P
    BEBEAR, C
    GENITOURINARY MEDICINE, 1995, 71 (06): : 382 - 386