The conjunctival allergen provocation test and the nasal allergen provocation test as specific alternatives to the oral food challenge

被引:1
|
作者
Krzych-Falta, Edyta [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Warsaw, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Environm Hazards Prevent & Allergol, 1a Banacha St, PL-02097 Warsaw, Poland
来源
POSTEPY DERMATOLOGII I ALERGOLOGII | 2022年 / 39卷 / 02期
关键词
food allergen; conjunctival allergen provocation test; nasal allergen provocation test; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.5114/ada.2021.105362
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Abstr act Provocation tests with allergens play a critical role in differential diagnosis of allergic diseases. The nasal allergen provocation test and the conjunctival allergen provocation test are particularly useful in the diagnosis of allergies with the underlying mechanism involving IgE-dependent reactions. Interestingly, the symptoms typical of both the nasal allergen provocation test and conjunctival allergen provocation test occur during the tests: ocular symptoms during the nasal test and typical nasal symptoms during the conjunctival test. These symptoms provide a picture of the early and late phases of the allergic reaction. Increasing attention is given to the role of the two provocation tests in differential diagnosis of food allergies, and the first studies involving food challenge tests provide a solid foundation for further research in this area.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 250
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] NASAL SECRETORY RESPONSE TO ALLERGEN PROVOCATION
    COHEN, RA
    BRESTEL, EP
    CLINICAL ALLERGY, 1988, 18 (05): : 435 - 443
  • [42] STANDARDIZED ALLERGEN PROVOCATION TEST - VARIATION IN BRONCHIAL RESPONSE
    LOWHAGEN, O
    LINDHOLM, NB
    ALLERGY, 1980, 35 (04) : 349 - 356
  • [43] THE REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE NASAL PROVOCATION TEST (NPT) - COMPARISON OF ALLERGEN TITRATION WITH ONE SINGLE COMMONLY USED ALLERGEN CONCENTRATION
    BACHERT, C
    BULLETIN EUROPEEN DE PHYSIOPATHOLOGIE RESPIRATOIRE-CLINICAL RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 23 : S374 - S374
  • [44] Changes in the perception of allergen, its avoidance, and immunotherapy after skin prick test/intradermal test, nasal provocation test, and allergen specific intralymphatic immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis
    Pyo, Sang L.
    Leo, S. M.
    ALLERGY, 2015, 70 : 463 - 464
  • [45] Nasal specific-IgE and positive nasal allergen provocation test to grass and olive pollen in patients with idiopathic rhinitis
    Rondon, C.
    Rodriguez-Bada, J.
    Lopez, S.
    Romero-Andreu, J.
    R-Pena, R.
    Chaves, P.
    Campo, P.
    Cornejo-Garcia, J.
    Guijarro, F.
    Blanca, M.
    ALLERGY, 2007, 62 : 486 - 486
  • [46] A new perspective on acoustic rhinometry in terms of standardisation, including the nasal allergen provocation test
    Krzych-Falta, Edyta
    Kaczynska, Olga
    Samolinski, Boleslaw
    Sybilski, Adam
    POSTEPY DERMATOLOGII I ALERGOLOGII, 2022, 39 (05): : 852 - 855
  • [47] Nasal allergen provocation test with multiple aeroallergens detects polysensitization in local allergic rhinitis
    Rondon, Carmen
    Campo, Paloma
    Herrera, Rocio
    Blanca-Lopez, Natalia
    Melendez, Lidia
    Canto, Gabriela
    Torres, Maria J.
    Blanca, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 128 (06) : 1192 - 1197
  • [48] INHIBITION OF DIFFERENT DOSAGES OF OXATOMIDE OR PLACEBO ON SKIN PRICK TEST AND NASAL ALLERGEN PROVOCATION
    PIACENTINI, GL
    PERONI, DG
    SETTE, L
    BONIZZATO, C
    BENEDETTI, M
    BONER, AL
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1991, 88 (02) : 218 - 225
  • [49] The role of the nasal allergen provocation test in local allergic rhinitis cases: a preliminary report
    Krzych-Falta, Edyta
    Furmanczyk, Konrad
    Dziewa-Dawidczyk, Diana
    Wojas, Oksana
    Reklewska, Katarzyna
    Samolinski, Boleslaw K.
    POSTEPY DERMATOLOGII I ALERGOLOGII, 2020, 37 (06): : 890 - 897
  • [50] Comparison of effects of topical levocabastine and nedocromil sodium on the early response in a conjunctival provocation test with allergen
    Hammann, C
    Kammerer, R
    Gerber, M
    Spertini, F
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 98 (06) : 1045 - 1050