Single Percutaneous Tract Combined with Flexible Nephroscopy in the Management of Kidney Stones 2-4 cm: Better Options of Treatment Protocols

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Xiaobo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gu, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xiong [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Yuanqing [2 ]
Chen, Mingquan [1 ]
Hu, Sheng [1 ]
Liu, Zhenyu [1 ]
Li, Dongjie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Xiangya Int Med Ctr, Dept Geriatr, Changsha 410008, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Disorders, Changsha 410008, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Urolithiasis Inst, Changsha 410008, Peoples R China
关键词
flexible nephroscopy; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; retrograde intrarenal surgery; stone free rate; patient satisfaction; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; STAGHORN CALCULI; RENAL STONES; NEPHROLITHOTOMY; LITHOTRIPSY; OUTCOMES; ANATOMY; ACCESS; YOUNG;
D O I
10.22037/uj.v0i0.5427
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the safety and efficacy of single percutaneous tract combined with flexible nephroscopy in the Management of 2-4 cm renal calculi. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analysed the treatment data of patients with 2-4 cm renal calculi from June 2010 to June 2017. The data included 217 cases of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), 441 cases of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and 217 cases of single-access percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with flexible nephroscopy (PNCFN). The collected data were analyzed. Results: A total of 875 cases were studied, with an average age of 42.35 +/- 10.29 years. Group PNCFN showed the highest stone-free rates (SFRs)(73.7 vs 66.7 vs 80.2, P = .00), best patient satisfaction (89.84 vs 87.23 vs 92.29, P = .00). The length of stay was shorter in the RIRS group relative to the other two groups (5.22 vs 5.65 vs 3.72, P = .00). Haemoglobin decrease (> 10 g/L) was higher in group PNL than that in group RIRS and group PNCFN (P = .012). Hospitalization fees (RMB) were Increased in group PNCFN compared with that in group PNL and group RIRS (34563.45 vs 21334.69 vs 33343.16, P = .000). Treatment protocols of PNL decreased from 17.51% to 9.22%, those for RIRS from 5.22% to 17.69%, peaking at 2012, PNCFN from 8.29% to 15.67% showed a rapid growth trend. Conclusion: The percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with flexible nephroscopy treatment on renal calculi of 2-4 cm was associated with higher stone-free rates and better patient satisfaction than RIRS and PNL.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 33
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Totally tubeless single access tract mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in treatment of large burden > 2-cm and/or complex renal stones: a case series of 62 patients
    Chang-Heng Lin
    Ying-Chen Lin
    Heng-Chieh Chiang
    Meng-Yi Yan
    Wan-Yun Fang
    Pao-Hwa Chen
    BMC Urology, 22
  • [42] Staged single-tract minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of staghorn stone in patients with solitary kidney
    Xu, Guibin
    Li, Xun
    He, Yongzhong
    He, Zhaohui
    UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 40 (06): : 745 - 749
  • [43] Staged single-tract minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of staghorn stone in patients with solitary kidney
    Guibin Xu
    Xun Li
    Yongzhong He
    Zhaohui He
    Urological Research, 2012, 40 : 745 - 749
  • [44] A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones
    Bozzini, G.
    Verze, P.
    Arcaniolo, D.
    Dal Piaz, O.
    Buffi, N. M.
    Guazzoni, G.
    Provenzano, M.
    Osmolorskij, B.
    Sanguedolce, F.
    Montanari, E.
    Macchione, N.
    Pummer, K.
    Mirone, V.
    De Sio, M.
    Taverna, G.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (12) : 1967 - 1975
  • [45] A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experienceA better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones
    G. Bozzini
    P. Verze
    D. Arcaniolo
    O. Dal Piaz
    N. M. Buffi
    G. Guazzoni
    M. Provenzano
    B. Osmolorskij
    F. Sanguedolce
    E. Montanari
    N. Macchione
    K. Pummer
    V. Mirone
    M. De Sio
    G. Taverna
    World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 1967 - 1975
  • [46] Microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the treatment of 1-2 cm high hardness single upper ureteral stones: a propensity score-matched study
    Wang, Ganlin
    Pan, Tingan
    Zhou, Yijun
    Dai, Xiaonong
    Zhang, Zhenglin
    Li, Wenjian
    UROLITHIASIS, 2024, 52 (01)
  • [47] Comparison of absorbed irrigation fluid volumes during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones larger than 2 cm
    Guzelburc, Vahit
    Balasar, Mehmet
    Colakogullari, Mukaddes
    Guven, Selcuk
    Kandemir, Abdulkadir
    Ozturk, Ahmet
    Karaaslan, Pelin
    Erkurt, Bulent
    Albayrak, Selami
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2016, 5
  • [48] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) vs flexible ureterorenoscopy lithotripsy (f-URSL): a matched analysis of treatment in patients with single renal stones ≤ 4 cm comparing clinical efficacy and safety profile
    Shao-Wei, D.
    Chung, C. -H.
    Kao, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 228 - 228
  • [49] Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy with Automatic Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure versus Mini PCNL for the Treatment of 2-3-cm Kidney Stones in Patients with a Solitary Kidney
    Deng, Xiaolin
    Xie, Donghua
    Huang, Xin
    Huang, Jianrong
    Song, Leming
    Du, Chuance
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2022, 106 (12) : 1293 - 1297
  • [50] Comparative study for the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nefhrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the treatment of 2-3,5 cm kidney stones
    Luis Palmero, Jose
    Duran-Rivera, Andrea J.
    Miralles, Jaume
    Carlos Pastor, Juan
    Benedicto, Antonio
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2016, 69 (02): : 67 - 72