The Purpose of Play: How HCI Games Research Fails Neurodivergent Populations

被引:55
|
作者
Spiel, Katta [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gerling, Kathrin [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, eMedia Res Lab, Leuven, Belgium
[2] TU Wien, HCI Grp, Argentinierstr 8-2, A-3000 Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Vienna, Ctr Teacher Educ, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Games; play; neurodiversity; neurodivergence; critical review; disability; children; adults; research priorities; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; SERIOUS GAME; AUTISTIC-CHILDREN; CEREBRAL-PALSY; SPECIAL NEEDS; DISABILITY; COMMUNICATION; COMPETENCE; MOTIVATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1145/3432245
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Play presents a popular pastime for all humans, though not all humans play alike. Subsequently, Human-Computer Interaction Games research is increasingly concerned with the development of games that serve neurodivergent(1) players. In a critical review of 66 publications informed by Disability Studies and Self-Determination Theory, we analyse which populations, research methods, kinds of play and overall purpose goals existing games address. We find that games are largely developed for children, in a top-down approach. They tend to focus on educational and medical settings and are driven by factors extrinsic to neurodivergent interests. Existing work predominantly follows a medical model of disability, which fails to support self-determination of neurodivergent players and marginalises their opportunities for immersion. Our contribution comprises a large-scale investigation into a budding area of research gaining traction with the intent to capture a status quo and identify opportunities for futurework attending to differences without articulating them as deficit.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ancient Greek board games and how to play them
    Kurke, L
    CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY, 1999, 94 (03) : 247 - 267
  • [22] How to Evaluate Technologies for Health Behavior Change in HCI Research
    Klasnja, Predrag
    Consolvo, Sunny
    Pratt, Wanda
    29TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2011, : 3063 - 3072
  • [23] Tangible Play: Research and Design for Tangible and Tabletop Games
    van den Hoven, Elise
    Mazalek, Ali
    2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT USER INTERFACES, 2007, : 6 - 6
  • [24] How to play storytelling games with masterpieces: from art galleries to hybrid board games
    Vayanou, Maria
    Ioannidis, Yannis
    Loumos, George
    Kargas, Antonis
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION, 2019, 6 (01) : 79 - 116
  • [25] How to play storytelling games with masterpieces: from art galleries to hybrid board games
    Maria Vayanou
    Yannis Ioannidis
    George Loumos
    Antonis Kargas
    Journal of Computers in Education, 2019, 6 : 79 - 116
  • [26] Partial-Observation Stochastic Games: How to Win when Belief Fails
    Chatterjee, Krishnendu
    Doyen, Laurent
    2012 27TH ANNUAL ACM/IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON LOGIC IN COMPUTER SCIENCE (LICS), 2012, : 175 - 184
  • [27] Partial-Observation Stochastic Games: How to Win when Belief Fails
    Chatterjee, Krishnendu
    Doyen, Laurent
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL LOGIC, 2014, 15 (02)
  • [28] HOW TO PLAY GAMES? NASH VERSUS BERGE BEHAVIOUR RULES
    Courtois, Pierre
    Nessah, Rabia
    Tazdait, Tarik
    ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2015, 31 (01) : 123 - 139
  • [29] LEARNING HOW TO COOPERATE - OPTIMAL PLAY IN REPEATED COORDINATION GAMES
    CRAWFORD, VP
    HALLER, H
    ECONOMETRICA, 1990, 58 (03) : 571 - 595
  • [30] Explaining how to play real-time strategy games
    Metoyer, Ronald
    Stumpf, Simone
    Neumann, Christoph
    Dodge, Jonathan
    Cao, Jill
    Schnabel, Aaron
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2010, 23 (04) : 295 - 301