The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services

被引:292
|
作者
Boerner, Jan [1 ]
Baylis, Kathy [2 ]
Corbera, Esteve [3 ]
Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss [4 ]
Honey-Roses, Jordi [5 ]
Persson, U. Martin [6 ]
Wunder, Sven [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Ctr Cooperat Int Rech Agron Dev CIRAD, Montpellier, France
[5] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Chalmers Univ Technol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[7] Ctr Int Forestry Res CIFOR, Lima, Peru
关键词
payments for ecosystem services; environmental effectiveness; trade-offs; policy design; impact evaluation; LAND CONVERSION PROGRAM; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; FOREST CONSERVATION; COSTA-RICA; DESIGNING PAYMENTS; LATIN-AMERICA; WIN-WIN; POLICY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
We adopt a theory-based approach to synthesize research on the effectiveness of payments for environmental services in achieving environmental objectives and socio-economic co-benefits in varying contexts. Our theory of change builds on established conceptual models of impact pathways and highlights the role of (1) contextual dimensions (e.g., political, institutional, and socio-economic conditions, spatial heterogeneity in environmental service values and provision costs, and interactions with pre-existing policies), and (2) scheme design (e.g., payment type and level, contract length, targeting, and differentiation of payments) in determining environmental and socio-economic outcomes. To shed light on the overall effectiveness of payment schemes, and its determinants, we review counterfactual-based empirical evaluations, comparative analyses of case-studies, and meta-analyses. Our review suggests that program effectiveness often lags behind the expectations of early theorists. However, we also find that theory has advanced sufficiently to identify common reasons for why payment schemes fail or succeed. Moreover, payment schemes are often rolled out along with other policy instruments in so-called policy mixes. Advances in theory and evaluation research are needed to improve our understanding of how such policy mixes interact with the targeted social-ecological systems. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 374
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Payments for environmental services (PES): contribution to Indigenous livelihoods
    Greiner, R.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND INVESTMENT ASSESSMENT III, 2010, 131 : 163 - 174
  • [22] Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services
    Ferraro, Paul J.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 65 (04) : 810 - 821
  • [23] Differentiated payments for environmental services schemes: Amethodology proposal
    Carlos R. Aguilar-Gómez
    Sergio Franco-Maass
    Tizbe T. Arteaga-Reyes
    Journal of Mountain Science, 2018, 15 : 1693 - 1710
  • [24] The effect of spatial interdependencies on prioritization and payments for environmental services
    Duke, Joshua M.
    Dundas, Steven J.
    Johnston, Robert J.
    Messer, Kent D.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 48 : 341 - 350
  • [25] Payments for Environmental Services: Past Performance and Pending Potentials
    Wunder, Sven
    Boerner, Jan
    Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss
    Feder, Sarah
    Pagiola, Stefano
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 12, 2020, 12 : 209 - 234
  • [26] "Carbon rights", REDD plus and payments for environmental services
    Karsenty, Alain
    Vogel, Aurelie
    Castell, Frederic
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2014, 35 : 20 - 29
  • [27] Differentiated payments for environmental services schemes: Amethodology proposal
    Aguilar-Gomez, Carlos R.
    Franco-Maass, Sergio
    Arteaga-Reyes, Tizbe T.
    JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2018, 15 (08) : 1693 - 1710
  • [28] Uncertainties in demonstrating environmental benefits of payments for ecosystem services
    de Lima, Letica Santos
    Krueger, Tobias
    Garcia-Marquez, Jaime
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 27 : 139 - 149
  • [29] The Economic and Legal Sides of Additionality in Payments for Environmental Services
    Karsenty, Alain
    Aubert, Sigrid
    Brimont, Laura
    Dutilly, Celine
    Desbureaux, Sebastien
    de Blass, Driss Ezzine
    Le Velly, Gwenole
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2017, 27 (05) : 422 - 435
  • [30] Upscaling Payments for Environmental Services (PES): Critical issues
    Pirard, Romain
    Bille, Raphael
    Sembres, Thomas
    TROPICAL CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2010, 3 (03): : 249 - 261