The cost-effectiveness of mechanical forms of DVT prophylaxis in general surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Ramaswami, G
Nicolaides, AN
机构
关键词
deep venous thrombosis; intermittent pneumatic; compression;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Graduated elastic compression (GEC) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) are physical methods used for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). To determine if this prevention is cost-effective, we reviewed the literature to identify the number of thromboembolic events prevented by current prophylaxis, and the cost associated with these events, as well as their avoidance with prophylaxis. In 6 studies, GEC stockings were shown to produce a 64% reduction in DVT in patients undergoing general surgery. The mean incidence of DVT in 525 unprophylaxed patients was 22.5% and in the treatment group 8.2% (95% CI 2.7-13.7). IPC has been shown to produce a 74% reduction in the incidence of post-operative DVT in 11 studies (general surgery). The mean incidence of DVT in 665 patients in the control group was 26% and in the treatment group 6.8% (95% CI 4.8-8.8). Based on the efficacy and risk reduction that DVT prophylaxis provides, the total cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis was calculated per 1000 patients. The cost of no prophylaxis in general surgery was pound 23,300. The cost of various methods of prophylaxis, including pharmacological as well as mechanical modalities, plus the cost of treating the few DVT that become clinically manifest despite prophylaxis is less expensive than that of using no prophylaxis at all. GEC stockings are cost-effective in low-risk surgical patients and can be used in combination with other methods of prevention in moderate and high risk surgical patients. IPC is also a cost-effective modality of prophylaxis in general surgery. We conclude that mechanical prophylaxis provides the most cost-effective method for preventing DVT in patients undergoing low and moderate risk surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 26
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intracameral moxifloxacin for endophthalmitis prophylaxis after cataract surgery: Cost-effectiveness analysis
    Leung, Ella H.
    Gibbons, Allister
    Stout, J. Timothy
    Koch, Douglas D.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 44 (08): : 971 - 978
  • [22] Cost-Effectiveness of Preoperative Topical Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Endophthalmitis Following Cataract Surgery
    Felfeli, Tina
    Miranda, Rafael N.
    Kaur, Jeeventh
    Chan, Clara C.
    Naimark, David M. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 247 : 152 - 160
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness with mechanical Symptoms
    Becher, Christoph
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2014, 152 (05): : 429 - 429
  • [24] Cost-effectiveness of Carotid Surgery
    Vicente Jimenez, Sandra
    Carrasco, Pilar
    Rodriguez, Gil
    Doblas, Manuel
    Orgaz, Antonio
    Flores, Angel
    Maynar, Manuel
    Gonzalez-Fajardo, Jose A.
    Fontcuberta, Juan
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 57 : 177 - 186
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness of carotid surgery
    Smurawska, LT
    Alexandrov, AV
    Norris, JW
    STROKE, 1996, 27 (01) : 30 - 30
  • [26] Cost-effectiveness analysis in surgery
    Finlayson, SRG
    Birkmeyer, JD
    SURGERY, 1998, 123 (02) : 151 - 156
  • [27] Cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery
    Agarwal, Amar
    Kumar, Dhivya Ashok
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 22 (01) : 15 - 18
  • [28] Cost-effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery
    Maciejewski, Matthew L.
    Arterburn, David E.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (07): : 742 - 743
  • [29] Using published, institutional data to evaluate the cost effectiveness of DVT prophylaxis
    Wade, WE
    Taylor, AT
    Spruill, WJ
    FORMULARY, 1996, 31 (12) : 1203 - +
  • [30] A cost-effectiveness analysis of stress ulcer prophylaxis
    Schupp, KN
    Schrand, LM
    Mutnick, AH
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2003, 37 (05) : 631 - 635