Stochastic roadmap simulation for the study of ligand-protein interactions

被引:19
|
作者
Apaydin, MS [1 ]
Guestrin, CE
Varma, C
Brutlag, DL
Latombe, JC
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Biochem, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_2.S18
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Understanding the dynamics of ligand-protein interactions is indispensable in the design of novel therapeutic agents. In this paper, we establish the use of Stochastic Roadmap Simulation (SRS) for the study of ligand-protein interactions through two studies. In our first study, we measure the effects of mutations on the catalytic site of a protein, a process called computational mutagenesis. In our second study, we focus on distinguishing the catalytic site from other putative binding sites. SRS compactly represents many Monte Carlo (MC) simulation paths in a compact graph structure, or roadmap. Furthermore, SRS allows us to analyze all the paths in this roadmap simultaneously. In our application of SRS to the domain of ligand-protein interactions, we consider a new parameter called escape time, the expected number of MC simulation steps required for the ligand to escape from the 'funnel of attraction' of the binding site, as a metric for analyzing such interactions. Although computing escape times would probably be infeasible with MC simulation, these computations can be performed very efficiently with SRS. Our results for six mutant complexes for the first study and seven ligand-protein complexes for the second study, are very promising: In particular, the first results agree well with the biological interpretation of the mutations, while the second results show that escape time is a good metric to distinguish the catalytic site for five out of seven complexes.
引用
收藏
页码:S18 / S26
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE USE OF 3D ENVIRONMENT TO TEACH LIGAND-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS
    Rius-Alonso, C. A.
    Gonzalez Quezada, Y.
    INTED2015: 9TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2015, : 5880 - 5885
  • [32] Understanding ligand-protein interactions in affinity membrane chromatography for antibody purification
    Boi, Cristiana
    Busini, Valentina
    Salvalaglio, Matteo
    Cavallotti, Carlo
    Sarti, Giulio C.
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2009, 1216 (50) : 8687 - 8696
  • [33] Direct visualization of ligand-protein interactions using atomic force microscopy
    Neish, CS
    Martin, IL
    Henderson, RM
    Edwardson, JM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 134
  • [34] A multilayer dynamic perturbation analysis method for predicting ligand-protein interactions
    Gu, Lin
    Li, Bin
    Ming, Dengming
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [35] Water-protein and ligand-protein interactions as determined by selective NMR relaxation studies
    Rossi, C
    Martini, S
    Ricci, M
    Picchi, MP
    Bonechi, C
    MACROMOLECULAR SYMPOSIA, 2003, 203 : 89 - 101
  • [36] Using Reverse Micelles to Extend the Detection Limit of Weak Ligand-Protein Interactions
    Fuglestad, Brian
    Kerstetter, Nicole E.
    Bed'ard, Sabrina
    Wand, A. Joshua
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 118 (03) : 324A - 324A
  • [37] Unique ligand-protein interactions in a new truncated hemoglobin from Mycobacterium tuberculosis
    Mukai, M
    Savard, PY
    Ouellet, H
    Guertin, M
    Yeh, SR
    BIOCHEMISTRY, 2002, 41 (12) : 3897 - 3905
  • [38] Real-time dipole orientational imaging as a probe of ligand-protein interactions
    Osborne, MA
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2005, 109 (38): : 18153 - 18161
  • [39] Stabilizing non-covalent interactions of ligand aromatic moieties and proline in ligand-protein systems
    Jovanovic, Milena
    Gruden-Pavlovic, Maja
    Zlatovic, Mario
    MONATSHEFTE FUR CHEMIE, 2015, 146 (02): : 389 - 397
  • [40] A Thermodynamic Comparison of Hydrophobic vs. Hydrophilic Ligand-Protein Interactions.
    Dennis, Caitriona
    Syme, Neil
    Bronowska, Agnieszka
    Homans, Steve
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2009, 65 : S152 - S153