Cost-Effectiveness of Tisagenlecleucel in Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (pALL) and Adult Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) in Switzerland

被引:16
|
作者
Moradi-Lakeh, Maziar [1 ]
Yaghoubi, Mohsen [2 ,3 ]
Seitz, Patrick [4 ]
Javanbakht, Mehdi [5 ]
Brock, Elisabeth [6 ]
机构
[1] Optimax Access LLC, 93 Martinique, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 USA
[2] Mercer Univ, Dept Pharm Practice, Coll Pharm, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[3] Canada Optimax Access Consulting, 1803-2138 Madison Ave, Burnaby, BC V5C 6T6, Canada
[4] Novartis Pharma Schweiz AG, Suurstoffi 14, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland
[5] Optimax Access Ltd, Suite 30 Kenneth Dibben House,Enterprise Rd,South, Southampton SO16 7NS, Hants, England
[6] HealthEcon AG, Postfach 1510, CH-4001 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Adult diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; ALL; CAR-T; Cost-effectiveness; DLBCL; Gene therapy; pALL; Paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; Switzerland; Tisagenlecleucel; YOUNG-ADULTS; SURVIVAL; CHILDREN; THERAPY; TRANSPLANTATION; CLOFARABINE; CHILDHOOD; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; ETOPOSIDE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-021-01767-x
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction The purpose of the present analysis was to explore the cost-effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel in relapsed or refractory (r/r) paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (pALL) and r/r adult diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in Switzerland against a range of historical standard-of-care treatments. Methods Two cost-utility models were constructed for the two licensed indications using similar methodologies but indication-specific data. Clinical efficacy data were based on pooled analyses of clinical trials for tisagenlecleucel (pALL: ELIANA, ENSIGN, B2101J; DLBCL: JULIET, NCT02030834) and published data for comparator treatments. Treatment effects were compared based on matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) analyses. Four clinical lymphoma and leukaemia experts provided Switzerland-specific input regarding comparators, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, clinical evidence and costs, which were used to inform the models. The base case analysis reflected the perspective of the Swiss mandatory health insurance system. Deterministic, probabilistic and scenario analyses were carried out to explore the robustness of results. Results The base case analysis resulted in incremental costs of CHF 31,961-CHF 36,419 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for pALL across the different comparators and CHF 113,179 for DLBCL (1 CHF = 1.09 USD). Incremental costs per life-year gained ranged between CHF 33,906-CHF 97,399 across the two indications. Including productivity gains, tisagenlecleucel was shown to be dominant (more effective and less costly) over all the comparators for pALL and to result in incremental costs per life-year gained of CHF 57,324 for DLBCL. Conclusion Using hypothetical willingness-to-pay thresholds of CHF 100,000-150,000 per QALY gained, the present analysis has shown tisagenlecleucel to be a cost-effective treatment option in pALL and DLBCL.
引用
收藏
页码:3427 / 3443
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-effectiveness analysis of rituximab combined with CHOP for treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
    Best, JH
    Hornberger, J
    Proctor, SJ
    Omnes, LF
    Jost, F
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (04) : 462 - 470
  • [32] Transformation of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma to lymphoblastic lymphoma
    Kushwaha, Pritika
    Singh, Meeta
    Mallya, Varuna
    Jain, Shyama
    Aggarwal, Sunita
    Singh, Kishore
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (09) : S475 - S477
  • [33] A peculiar case of precursor B lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoma histologically mimicking diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
    Tasaki, K
    Nakamura, N
    Hojo, H
    Yoshihisa, A
    Maruyama, Y
    Abe, M
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2004, 44 (01) : 83 - 84
  • [34] A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Tisagenlecleucel in the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Based on a Real-World French Registry
    Ray, Markqayne
    Castaigne, Jean-Gabriel
    Zang, Alexandra
    Patel, Anik
    Hancock, Elizabeth
    Brighton, Nicholas
    Bachy, Emmanuel
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2024, 41 (11) : 4282 - 4298
  • [35] Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) of the Small Bowel Presenting as Acute Gastroenteritis
    Catalano, Carmine
    Sidhu, Loveleen
    Anyadike, Nnaemeka
    Syed, Umer M.
    Companioni, Rafael A. Ching
    Tiba, Melik
    Tomaino, Christopher
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 : S476 - S476
  • [36] B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia as a secondary malignancy following diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
    Gaut, Dania
    Bejjani, Anthony
    Sasine, Joshua
    Schiller, Gary
    HEMATOLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 11 (02) : 43 - 45
  • [37] MODELING APPROACHES IN COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES OF CELL THERAPIES FOR RELAPSED/REFRACTORY DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA
    Hernandez, L. G.
    Martin, A. L.
    Brouwer, E. S.
    Chun, D.
    Cheng, L., I
    Bernhardt, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S53 - S53
  • [38] Exploring the potential cost-effectiveness of precision medicine treatment strategies for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
    Chen, Qiushi
    Staton, Ashley D.
    Ayer, Turgay
    Goldstein, Daniel A.
    Koff, Jean L.
    Flowers, Christopher R.
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2018, 59 (07) : 1700 - 1709
  • [39] US cost-effectiveness analysis of polatuzumab vedotin in previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
    Matasar, Matthew
    Masaquel, Anthony
    S. Ho, Rodrigo
    Launonen, Aino
    Ng, Carmen D.
    Wang, Rongrong
    Fox, David
    Hossain, Farah
    Li, Jia
    Burke, John M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 26 (01) : 1134 - 1144
  • [40] Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of tisagenlecleucel in adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma from Singapore's private insurance payer's perspective
    Wang, Xiao Jun
    Wang, Yi-Ho
    Li, Shing Chau Tony
    Gkitzia, Christina
    Lim, Soon Thye
    Koh, Liang Piu
    Lim, Francesca Lorraine Wei Inng
    Hwang, William Ying Khee
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 24 (01) : 637 - 653