Selection of Strategy for Large Group Emergency Decision-making based on Risk Measurement

被引:20
|
作者
Yin, Xuanpeng [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xuanhua [1 ]
Pan, Bin [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ Finance & Econ, Changsha 410205, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Large group; Emergency decision; Risk measurement; Strategy selection; CONSENSUS MODEL; PROSPECT-THEORY; UTILITY; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; SENSITIVITY; UNDERSTAND; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2020.107325
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Different strategies can be applied in large group emergency decision-making, including the voting strategy, the delegation strategy, and the averaging strategy, etc. The choice of decision-making strategy not only affects the efficiency but also the accuracy of decision-making. Based on signal detection theory, a preference representation method for large group emergency decision-making is proposed. Combining the characteristics of the strategies, rules for the fusion of group preferences are presented, and a risk measurement model for large group emergency decision-making is constructed. By comparing the decision-making risk degree of each decision-making strategy under different conditions of group perception information breadth and external environment, the universal rules of large group emergency decision-making strategy selection are obtained. The results revealed that there are comparative advantages among decision-making strategies in specific situations, and that reasonable decision-making strategy selection can effectively control decision-making risk. The results provide a scientific reference and basis for guiding strategy selection in large group emergency decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Large group two-stage risk emergency decision-making method based on big data analysis of social media
    Xu, Xuan-Hua
    Yang, Xin
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Liu, Bingsheng
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (03) : 2645 - 2659
  • [23] RISK AND CONSERVATISM IN GROUP DECISION-MAKING
    MADARAS, GR
    BEM, DJ
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 4 (03) : 350 - 365
  • [24] RISK SHARING AND GROUP DECISION-MAKING
    ELIASHBERG, J
    WINKLER, RL
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1981, 27 (11) : 1221 - 1235
  • [25] Trust Information Fusion and Expert Opinion for Large Group Emergency Decision-Making Based on Complex Network
    Xuanhua X.
    Li H.
    Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2022, 6 (2-3): : 348 - 363
  • [26] A Probabilistic Linguistic Large-Group Emergency Decision-Making Method Based on the Louvain Algorithm and Group Pressure Model
    Wang, Zhiying
    Liu, Hanjie
    Ma, Ruohan
    MATHEMATICS, 2025, 13 (04)
  • [27] GROUP OFFERS RISK-BASED DECISION-MAKING REFORMS
    EMBER, L
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 1993, 71 (29) : 30 - 31
  • [28] A multi-stage conflict style large group emergency decision-making method
    Cai, Chen-guang
    Xu, Xuan-hua
    Wang, Pei
    Chen, Xiao-hong
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 21 (19) : 5765 - 5778
  • [29] A Large Group Emergency Decision-Making Approach on HFLTS With Public Preference Data Mining
    Zhao, Mengke
    Guo, Ji
    Wu, Xianhua
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 32 (01)
  • [30] A multi-stage conflict style large group emergency decision-making method
    Chen-guang Cai
    Xuan-hua Xu
    Pei Wang
    Xiao-hong Chen
    Soft Computing, 2017, 21 : 5765 - 5778