Selection of Strategy for Large Group Emergency Decision-making based on Risk Measurement

被引:20
|
作者
Yin, Xuanpeng [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xuanhua [1 ]
Pan, Bin [2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ Finance & Econ, Changsha 410205, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Large group; Emergency decision; Risk measurement; Strategy selection; CONSENSUS MODEL; PROSPECT-THEORY; UTILITY; UNCERTAINTY; INFORMATION; SENSITIVITY; UNDERSTAND; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2020.107325
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Different strategies can be applied in large group emergency decision-making, including the voting strategy, the delegation strategy, and the averaging strategy, etc. The choice of decision-making strategy not only affects the efficiency but also the accuracy of decision-making. Based on signal detection theory, a preference representation method for large group emergency decision-making is proposed. Combining the characteristics of the strategies, rules for the fusion of group preferences are presented, and a risk measurement model for large group emergency decision-making is constructed. By comparing the decision-making risk degree of each decision-making strategy under different conditions of group perception information breadth and external environment, the universal rules of large group emergency decision-making strategy selection are obtained. The results revealed that there are comparative advantages among decision-making strategies in specific situations, and that reasonable decision-making strategy selection can effectively control decision-making risk. The results provide a scientific reference and basis for guiding strategy selection in large group emergency decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study on the selection of large group emergency decision-making strategies under the perspective of risk
    Yin X.
    Xu X.
    Chen X.
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2021, 41 (03): : 678 - 690
  • [2] Risk Measurement of Large Group Emergency Decision-making of Major Floods Disaster Based on Social Network
    Xu, Xuanhua
    Zhang, Qianhui
    Wang, Linlin
    Liu, Shanglong
    Yang, Xin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH ANNUAL MEETING OF RISK ANALYSIS COUNCIL OF CHINA ASSOCIATION FOR DISASTER PREVENTION (RAC 2018), 2018, 66 : 283 - 288
  • [3] Risk mechanisms of large group emergency decision-making based on multi-agent simulation
    Xuanpeng Yin
    Xuanhua Xu
    Xiaohong Chen
    Natural Hazards, 2020, 103 : 1009 - 1034
  • [4] Large group emergency decision-making method with linguistic risk appetites based on criteria mining
    Xu, Xuanhua
    Wang, Linlin
    Chen, Xiaohong
    Liu, Bingsheng
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2019, 182
  • [5] Risk mechanisms of large group emergency decision-making based on multi-agent simulation
    Yin, Xuanpeng
    Xu, Xuanhua
    Chen, Xiaohong
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2020, 103 (01) : 1009 - 1034
  • [6] Risk evolution model for large group emergency decision-making influenced by extreme preference
    Cao J.
    Xu X.
    Chen X.
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2019, 39 (03): : 596 - 614
  • [7] Optimizing Emergency Shelter Selection in Earthquakes Using a Risk-Driven Large Group Decision-Making Support System
    Lomer, Amir Reza Bakhshi
    Rezaeian, Mahdi
    Rezaei, Hamid
    Lorestani, Akbar
    Mijani, Naeim
    Mahdad, Mohammadreza
    Raeisi, Ahmad
    Arsanjani, Jamal Jokar
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [8] A risky large group emergency decision-making method based on topic sentiment analysis
    Cao, Jing
    Xu, Xuanhua
    Yin, Xuanpeng
    Pan, Bin
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 195
  • [9] ADAPTIVE STRATEGY SELECTION IN DECISION-MAKING
    PAYNE, JW
    BETTMAN, JR
    JOHNSON, EJ
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1988, 14 (03) : 534 - 552
  • [10] A Dynamic Emergency Decision-Making Method Based on Group Decision Making with Uncertainty Information
    Zheng, Jing
    Wang, Yingming
    Zhang, Kai
    Liang, Juan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE, 2020, 11 (05) : 667 - 679