Could deep learning in neural networks improve the QSAR models?

被引:22
|
作者
Gini, G. [1 ]
Zanoli, F. [1 ]
Gamba, A. [2 ]
Raitano, G. [2 ]
Benfenati, E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, DEIB, Milan, Italy
[2] Ist Ric Farmacol Mario Negri IRCCS, Lab Environm Chem & Toxicol, Milan, Italy
关键词
Classification; feature generation; deep neural networks; Ames test; mutagenicity; SMILES;
D O I
10.1080/1062936X.2019.1650827
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Assessing chemical toxicity is a multidisciplinary process, traditionally involving in vivo, in vitro and in silico tests. Currently, toxicological goal is to reduce new tests on chemicals, exploiting all information yet available. Recent advancements in machine learning and deep neural networks allow computers to automatically mine patterns and learn from data. This technology, applied to (Q)SAR model development, leads to discover by learning the structural-chemical-biological relationships and the emergent properties. Starting from Toxception, a deep neural network predicting activity from the chemical graph image, we designed SmilesNet, a recurrent neural network taking SMILES as the only input. We then integrated the two networks into C-Tox network to make the final classification. Results of our networks, trained on a similar to 20K molecule dataset with Ames test experimental values, match or even outperform the current state of the art. We also extract knowledge from the networks and compare it with the available mutagenic structural alerts. The advantage over traditional QSAR modelling is that our models automatically extract the features without using descriptors. Nevertheless, the model is successful if large numbers of examples are provided and computation is more complex than in classical methods.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 642
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Exploiting exercise electrocardiography to improve early diagnosis of atrial fibrillation with deep learning neural networks
    Lee, Hsiang-Chun
    Chen, Chun-Yen
    Lee, Shie-Jue
    Lee, Ming -Chuan
    Tsai, Ching-Yi
    Chen, Su -Te
    Li, Yu -Ju
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 146
  • [42] Learning with Type-2 Fuzzy activation functions to improve the performance of Deep Neural Networks
    Beke, Aykut
    Kumbasar, Tufan
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 85 : 372 - 384
  • [43] QSAR modelling using combined simple competitive learning networks and RBF neural networks
    Sheikhpour, R.
    Sarram, M. A.
    Rezaeian, M.
    Sheikhpour, E.
    SAR AND QSAR IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (04) : 257 - 276
  • [44] A Deep Neural Networks (DNN) Based Models for a Computer Aided Pronunciation Learning System
    Elaraby, Mohamed S.
    Abdallah, Mustafa
    Abdou, Sherif
    Rashwan, Mohsen
    SPEECH AND COMPUTER, 2016, 9811 : 51 - 58
  • [45] A mixture of shallow neural networks for virtual sensing: Could perform better than deep neural networks
    Shao, Weiming
    Li, Xu
    Xing, Yupeng
    Chen, Junghui
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 256
  • [46] PDE MODELS FOR DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS: LEARNING THEORY, CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS AND OPTIMAL CONTROL
    Markowich, Peter
    Portaro, Simone
    arXiv,
  • [47] Inspecting the behaviour of Deep Learning Neural Networks
    Duer, Alexander
    Filzmoser, Peter
    Rauber, Andreas
    ERCIM NEWS, 2019, (116): : 18 - 19
  • [48] Piecewise linear neural networks and deep learning
    Qinghua Tao
    Li Li
    Xiaolin Huang
    Xiangming Xi
    Shuning Wang
    Johan A. K. Suykens
    Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2
  • [49] Learning deep neural networks for node classification
    Li, Bentian
    Pi, Dechang
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 137 : 324 - 334
  • [50] Abstraction Hierarchy in Deep Learning Neural Networks
    Ilin, Roman
    Watson, Thomas
    Kozma, Robert
    2017 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2017, : 768 - 774