Experimental test of the prospect theory value function: A stochastic dominance approach

被引:26
|
作者
Levy, H [1 ]
Levy, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Sch Business Adm, IL-91905 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00011-0
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
According to prospect theory, individuals are risk averse regarding gains but risk seeking regarding losses, implying an S-shaped value function. The S-shaped value function hypothesis is based on experiments in which subjects are asked to choose separately between alternatives with either only positive or only negative outcomes, alternatives which rarely exist in the capital market. In addition, the S-shaped findings may be biased by the "certainty effect" and by probability distortion. In this paper we employ the recently developed prospect stochastic dominance criterion to test the prospect theory S-shaped value function hypothesis with mixed outcomes and with no "certainty effect." Assuming that subjects do not distort moderate probabilities, we strongly reject the prospect theory S-shaped value function, with at least 76-86% of the choices being inconsistent with such preferences. When possible subjective probability distortions are taken into account, we find that at least 50-66% of the choices are inconsistent with an S-shaped value function. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1058 / 1081
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spanning Analysis of Stock Market Anomalies Under Prospect Stochastic Dominance
    Arvanitis, Stelios
    Scaillet, Olivier
    Topaloglou, Nikolas
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2024, 70 (09) : 6002 - 6025
  • [32] Empirical test of the efficiency of the UK covered warrants market: Stochastic dominance and likelihood ratio test approach
    Chan, Chia-Ying
    de Peretti, Christian
    Qiao, Zhuo
    Wong, Wing-Keung
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2012, 19 (01) : 162 - 174
  • [33] Value versus growth: stochastic dominance criteria
    Abhyankar, Abhay
    Ho, Keng-Yu
    Zhao, Huainan
    QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2008, 8 (07) : 693 - 704
  • [34] UPPER AND LOWER BOUNDS OF PUT AND CALL OPTION VALUE - STOCHASTIC-DOMINANCE APPROACH
    LEVY, H
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1985, 40 (04): : 1197 - 1217
  • [35] Stochastic Optimization in a Cumulative Prospect Theory Framework
    Jie, Cheng
    Prashanth, L. A.
    Fu, Michael
    Marcus, Steve
    Szepesvari, Csaba
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2018, 63 (09) : 2867 - 2882
  • [36] A stochastic dominance approach to the measurement of discrimination
    Le Breton, Michel
    Michelangeli, Alessandra
    Peluso, Eugenio
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2012, 147 (04) : 1342 - 1350
  • [37] Multivariate Stochastic Dominance: A Parametric Approach
    Kouaissah, Noureddine
    Lozza, Sergio Ortobelli
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2020, 40 (02): : 1380 - 1387
  • [38] An improved bootstrap test for restricted stochastic dominance
    Lok, Thomas M.
    V. Tabri, Rami
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2021, 224 (02) : 371 - 393
  • [39] STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE WITH ORDINAL VARIABLES: CONDITIONS AND A TEST
    Yalonetzky, Gaston
    ECONOMETRIC REVIEWS, 2013, 32 (01) : 126 - 163
  • [40] Decision making under risk: prospect theory approach and cognitive reflection test
    da Silva, Patrick Diliane Cardoso
    Mendonca, Jorge Manuel Pires
    Gomes, Luis Miguel Pereira
    Silva, Maria de Lurdes Vasconcelos Babo e
    REVISTA DE GESTAO E SECRETARIADO-GESEC, 2023, 14 (07): : 11891 - 11916