Feasibility and Acute Hemodynamic Effect of Left Ventricular Septal Pacing by Transvenous Approach Through the Interventricular Septum

被引:134
作者
Mafi-Rad, Masih [1 ]
Luermans, Justin G. L. M. [1 ]
Blaauw, Yuri [1 ]
Janssen, Michel [1 ]
Crijns, Harry J. [1 ]
Prinzen, Frits W. [2 ]
Vernooy, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Cardiol, Med Ctr, P Debeyelaan 25, NL-6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Physiol, Cardiovasc Res Inst, P Debeyelaan 25, NL-6229 HX Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
cardiac pacing; feasibility studies; ventricular dysfunction; left; ventricular septum; CONGESTIVE-HEART-FAILURE; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE ABLATION; CHRONIC ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; DUAL-CHAMBER; PHRENIC STIMULATION; QRS DURATION; DAVID TRIAL; LEAD; PERMANENT;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003344
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Left ventricular septal (LVS) pacing reduces ventricular dyssynchrony and improves cardiac function relative to right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing in animals. We aimed to establish permanent placement of an LVS pacing lead in patients using a transvenous approach through the interventricular septum. Methods and Results Ten patients with sinus node dysfunction scheduled for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation were prospectively enrolled. A custom pacing lead with extended helix was introduced via the left subclavian vein and, after positioning against the right ventricular septum (RVS) using a preshaped guiding catheter, driven through the interventricular septum to the LVS. The acute hemodynamic effect of RVA, RVS, and LVS pacing was evaluated by invasive LVdP/dtmax measurements. The lead was successfully delivered to the LVS in all patients. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time shortened with experience. QRS duration was shorter during LVS pacing (14420 ms) than during RVA (172 +/- 33 ms; P=0.02 versus LVS) and RVS pacing (165 +/- 17 ms; P=0.004 versus LVS). RVA and RVS pacing reduced LVdP/dtmax compared with baseline atrial pacing (-7.1 +/- 4.1% and -6.9 +/- 4.3%, respectively), whereas LVS pacing maintained LVdP/dtmax at baseline level (1.0 +/- 4.3%; P=0.001 versus RVA and RVS). R-wave amplitude and pacing threshold were 12.2 +/- 6.7 mV and 0.5 +/- 0.2 V at implant and remained stable during 6-month follow-up without lead-related complications. Conclusions Permanent placement of an LVS pacing lead by transvenous approach through the interventricular septum is feasible in patients. LVS pacing preserves acute left ventricular pump function. This new pacing method could serve as an alternative and hemodynamically preferable approach for antibradycardia pacing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Addition of a left ventricular lead to conventional pacing systems in patients with congestive heart failure: Feasibility, safety, and early results in 60 consecutive patients [J].
Baker, CM ;
Christopher, TJ ;
Smith, PF ;
Langberg, JJ ;
Delurgio, DB ;
Leon, AR .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 25 (08) :1166-1171
[2]   Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block and Systolic Dysfunction [J].
Goldschmidt, Howard .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (06) :578-579
[3]   Phrenic stimulation management in CRT patients: are we there yet? [J].
Biffi, Mauro ;
Boriani, Giuseppe .
CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 26 (01) :12-16
[4]   Phrenic Stimulation A Challenge for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [J].
Biffi, Mauro ;
Moschini, Carlotta ;
Bertini, Matteo ;
Saporito, Davide ;
Ziacchi, Matteo ;
Diemberger, Igor ;
Valzania, Cinzia ;
Domenichini, Giulia ;
Cervi, Elena ;
Martignani, Cristian ;
Sangiorgi, Diego ;
Branzi, Angelo ;
Boriani, Giuseppe .
CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 2 (04) :402-410
[5]  
Bonow RO, 2008, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V52, pE1, DOI [10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.032, 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.007, 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.04.014]
[6]   Single-centre experience with coronary sinus lead stability and tong-term pacing parameters [J].
Bulava, Alan ;
Luki, Jan .
EUROPACE, 2007, 9 (07) :523-527
[7]   Permanent direct his bundle pacing does not induce ventricular dyssynchrony unlike conventional right ventricular apical pacing - An intrapatient acute comparison study [J].
Catanzariti, Domenico ;
Maines, Massimiliano ;
Cemin, Claudio ;
Broso, Gianpaolo ;
Marotta, Tiziana ;
Vergara, Giuseppe .
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (02) :81-92
[8]  
Curtis AB, 2013, NEW ENGL J MED, V369, P579, DOI [10.1056/NEJMc1306998, 10.1056/NEJMoa1210356]
[9]   Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing - A quantitative review [J].
de Cock, CC ;
Giudici, MC ;
Twisk, JV .
EUROPACE, 2003, 5 (03) :275-278
[10]   Upgrading to Biventricular Pacing Guided by Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis During Implantation [J].
Delnoy, Peter Paul Hm ;
Ottervanger, Jan Paul ;
Vos, Dick Hs ;
Elvan, Arif ;
Misier, Anand R. Ramdat ;
Beukema, Willem P. ;
Steendijk, Paul ;
Van Hemel, Norbert M. .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 22 (06) :677-683