Individual variations in ankle brachial index measurement among Turkish adults

被引:9
|
作者
Demir, Orhan [1 ]
Tasci, Ilker [1 ]
Acikel, Cengizhan [2 ]
Saglam, Kenan [1 ]
Gezer, Mustafa [1 ]
Acar, Ramazan [1 ]
Yildiz, Birol [1 ]
Bulucu, Fatih [1 ]
Kabul, Hasan Kutsi [3 ]
Dogan, Mustafa Inanc [1 ]
Koc, Bayram [1 ]
机构
[1] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Internal Med, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Epidemiol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Cardiol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Peripheral arterial disease; ankle-brachial index; reproducibility; variation; PERIPHERAL ARTERY-DISEASE; LOWER-EXTREMITY; PRESSURE INDEX; TASK-FORCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; DIAGNOSIS; MEDICINE; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.1177/1708538115584506
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Purpose Variability of ankle brachial index (ABI) measured by the same observer in the same individual on three different occasions was examined. Basic methods A single morning ABI was initially determined (measurement 1) with handheld Doppler device. One to four weeks apart, another morning (measurement 2) and afternoon (measurement 3) ABI was measured on the same day. Principal findings A total of 161 adults were enrolled. Mean ABI was similar among the three measurements. ABI differed more than 0.15 in 15 individuals between measurement 1 and 3, in 10 subjects between measurement 1 and 2, and in 12 individuals between measurement 2 and 3. Intra-group correlation coefficients of reproducibility of ABI were 0.808 for single measurements (coefficient of the values lacking association with each other), and 0.927 for average measurements (coefficient of the values that were associated with each other). Conclusions Although reproducibility of ABI values was found satisfactory, up to 12% of participants displayed more than 0.15 alternations between measurements, either on the same day or more than a week apart.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 58
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Automated oscillometric measurement of the ankle–brachial index in patients with coronary artery disease
    Maciej Sinski
    Grzegorz Styczynski
    Cezary Szmigielski
    Hypertension Research, 2013, 36 : 25 - 28
  • [42] Validation of automated oscillometric versus manual measurement of the ankle-brachial index
    Richart, T.
    Kouznetsova, T.
    Wizner, B.
    Struijker-Boudier, H.
    Staessen, J.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2008, 26 : S499 - S499
  • [43] Calculation of the Ankle Brachial Index Response
    Albuquerque, Pedro Ferreira
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2012, 99 (02) : 773 - 773
  • [44] Critical Review of the Ankle Brachial Index
    Khan, Tahir H.
    Farooqui, Falahat A.
    Niazi, Khusrow
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2008, 4 (02) : 101 - 106
  • [45] Ankle brachial index and cardiovascular risk
    Mostaza, JM
    Vicente, I
    Cairols, M
    Castillo, J
    González-Juanatey, JR
    Pomar, JL
    Lahoz, C
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2003, 121 (02): : 68 - 73
  • [46] ATRIAL FIBRILLATION INFLUENCES AUTOMATIC OSCILLOMETRIC ANKLE-BRACHIAL INDEX MEASUREMENT
    Sinski, M.
    Lewandowski, J.
    Szmigielski, C.
    Dabrowski, M.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2018, 36 : E177 - E177
  • [47] Accuracy of in-patients ankle-brachial index measurement by medical students
    Monti, Matteo
    Calanca, Luca
    Alatri, Adriano
    Mazzolai, Lucia
    VASA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2016, 45 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [48] Atrial fibrillation influences automatic oscillometric ankle-brachial index measurement
    Dabrowski, Michal
    Lewandowski, Jacek
    Szmigielski, Cezary
    Sinski, Maciej
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 17 (03) : 621 - 627
  • [49] Variation in measurement of ankle-brachial pressure index in routine clinical practice
    Fisher, CM
    Burnett, A
    Makeham, V
    Kidd, J
    Glasson, M
    Harris, JP
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 24 (05) : 871 - 875
  • [50] PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY: A SIMPLIFIED METHOD FOR THE OFFICE MEASUREMENT OF ANKLE BRACHIAL INDEX IN INDIVIDUALS WITH DIABETES
    Danescu, Liviu G.
    Roe, Cheryl A.
    Johnson, Lewis W.
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2013, 19 (03) : 439 - 443