Handling missing MRI sequences in deep learning segmentation of brain metastases: a multicenter study

被引:36
|
作者
Grovik, Endre [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yi, Darvin [4 ]
Iv, Michael [2 ]
Tong, Elizabeth [2 ]
Nilsen, Line Brennhaug [1 ]
Latysheva, Anna [5 ]
Saxhaug, Cathrine [5 ]
Jacobsen, Kari Dolven [6 ]
Helland, Aslaug [6 ]
Emblem, Kyrre Eeg [1 ]
Rubin, Daniel L. [4 ]
Zaharchuk, Greg [2 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Phys, Oslo, Norway
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Univ South Eastern Norway, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Drammen, Norway
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Oslo, Norway
[6] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Oslo, Norway
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
CRITERIA; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1038/s41746-021-00398-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical value of a deep learning (DL) model for automatic detection and segmentation of brain metastases, in which a neural network is trained on four distinct MRI sequences using an input-level dropout layer, thus simulating the scenario of missing MRI sequences by training on the full set and all possible subsets of the input data. This retrospective, multicenter study, evaluated 165 patients with brain metastases. The proposed input-level dropout (ILD) model was trained on multisequence MRI from 100 patients and validated/tested on 10/55 patients, in which the test set was missing one of the four MRI sequences used for training. The segmentation results were compared with the performance of a state-of-the-art DeepLab V3 model. The MR sequences in the training set included pre-gadolinium and post-gadolinium (Gd) T1-weighted 3D fast spin echo, post-Gd T1-weighted inversion recovery (IR) prepped fast spoiled gradient echo, and 3D fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), whereas the test set did not include the IR prepped image-series. The ground truth segmentations were established by experienced neuroradiologists. The results were evaluated using precision, recall, Intersection over union (IoU)-score and Dice score, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve statistics, while the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the performance of the two neural networks. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), averaged across all test cases, was 0.989 +/- 0.029 for the ILD-model and 0.989 +/- 0.023 for the DeepLab V3 model (p = 0.62). The ILD-model showed a significantly higher Dice score (0.795 +/- 0.104 vs. 0.774 +/- 0.104, p = 0.017), and IoU-score (0.561 +/- 0.225 vs. 0.492 +/- 0.186, p < 0.001) compared to the DeepLab V3 model, and a significantly lower average false positive rate of 3.6/patient vs. 7.0/patient (p < 0.001) using a 10 mm(3) lesion-size limit. The ILD-model, trained on all possible combinations of four MRI sequences, may facilitate accurate detection and segmentation of brain metastases on a multicenter basis, even when the test cohort is missing input MRI sequences.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Deep learning based segmentation of brain tissue from diffusion MRI
    Zhang, Fan
    Breger, Anna
    Cho, Kang Ik Kevin
    Ning, Lipeng
    Westin, Carl-Fredrik
    O'Donnell, Lauren J.
    Pasternak, Ofer
    NEUROIMAGE, 2021, 233
  • [32] Tumor Segmentation in Multimodal Brain MRI Using Deep Learning Approaches
    Al Shehri, Waleed
    Jannah, Najlaa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2022, 22 (08): : 343 - 351
  • [33] Interinstitutional Portability of a Deep Learning Brain MRI Lesion Segmentation Algorithm
    Rauschecker, Andreas M.
    Gleason, Tyler J.
    Nedelec, Pierre
    Duong, Michael Tran
    Weiss, David A.
    Calabrese, Evan
    Colby, John B.
    Sugrue, Leo P.
    Rudie, Jeffrey D.
    Hess, Christopher P.
    RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 4 (01)
  • [34] Deep Learning for Brain MRI Segmentation: State of the Art and Future Directions
    Zeynettin Akkus
    Alfiia Galimzianova
    Assaf Hoogi
    Daniel L. Rubin
    Bradley J. Erickson
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2017, 30 : 449 - 459
  • [35] Multi-class glioma segmentation on real-world data with missing MRI sequences: comparison of three deep learning algorithms
    Hugh G. Pemberton
    Jiaming Wu
    Ivar Kommers
    Domenique M. J. Müller
    Yipeng Hu
    Olivia Goodkin
    Sjoerd B. Vos
    Sotirios Bisdas
    Pierre A. Robe
    Hilko Ardon
    Lorenzo Bello
    Marco Rossi
    Tommaso Sciortino
    Marco Conti Nibali
    Mitchel S. Berger
    Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper
    Wim Bouwknegt
    Wimar A. Van den Brink
    Julia Furtner
    Seunggu J. Han
    Albert J. S. Idema
    Barbara Kiesel
    Georg Widhalm
    Alfred Kloet
    Michiel Wagemakers
    Aeilko H. Zwinderman
    Sandro M. Krieg
    Emmanuel Mandonnet
    Ferran Prados
    Philip de Witt Hamer
    Frederik Barkhof
    Roelant S. Eijgelaar
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [36] MRI segmentation using deep learning network for brain tumour detection
    Ambily, N.
    Suresh, K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 43 (04) : 378 - 389
  • [37] Generative learning-based lightweight MRI brain tumor segmentation with missing modalities
    Zhang, Xinliang
    Chen, Qian
    He, Hangzhou
    Zhu, Lei
    Xie, Zhaoheng
    Lu, Yanye
    Cheng, Fangxiao
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2025, 261
  • [38] Hough-CNN: Deep learning for segmentation of deep brain regions in MRI and ultrasound
    Milletari, Fausto
    Ahmadi, Seyed-Ahmad
    Kroll, Christine
    Plate, Annika
    Rozanski, Verena
    Maiostre, Juliana
    Levin, Johannes
    Dietrich, Olaf
    Ertl-Wagner, Birgit
    Boetzel, Kai
    Navab, Nassir
    COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2017, 164 : 92 - 102
  • [39] A Deep Learning Based Brain Metastases Segmentation Web Platform for Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Yang, Z.
    Ju, X.
    Liu, H.
    Chen, M.
    Timmerman, R. D.
    Dan, T.
    Wardak, Z.
    Lu, W.
    Gu, X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E120 - E120
  • [40] DEEP LEARNING FOR TUMOUR SEGMENTATION WITH MISSING DATA
    Ruffle, James
    Mohinta, Samia
    Gray, Robert
    Hyare, Harpreet
    Nachev, Parashkev
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 : 16 - 16