When Are Pay Gaps Good or Bad for Firm Performance? Evidence from China

被引:18
|
作者
Luo, Jin-hui [1 ]
Xiang, Yuangao [2 ]
Zhu, Ruichao [3 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Management, Accounting, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Inst Financial & Accounting Studies, Accounting, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Accounting, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
China; firm performance; ownership structure; pay gap; relative deprivation theory; tournament theory; RANK-ORDER TOURNAMENTS; TOP MANAGEMENT; UNITED-STATES; DISPERSION; COMPENSATION; INCENTIVES; EMPLOYEES; INTERDEPENDENCE; CONTINGENCIES; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1017/mor.2019.42
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
There is still an ongoing debate regarding the firm performance implications of pay gaps between top executives and subordinate employees. This study integrates relative deprivation theory and tournament theory to investigate the potential nonlinear effects of pay gaps. We expect that at low levels of pay inequality, increased inequality hurts firm productivity, while at higher levels of pay inequality, increased inequality helps firm productivity. Our study of Chinese firms confirms that pay gaps have an approximately U-shaped relationship with firm performance. This nonlinear relationship is weaker in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) than in non-SOEs, suggesting that state ownership is an important moderator in the association. Overall, this study explains previous mixed findings regarding consequences of pay gaps with meaningful implications for policymakers and entrepreneurs in China and other economies with similar cultural and institutional backgrounds.
引用
收藏
页码:1030 / 1056
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mutual funds, tunneling and firm performance: evidence from China
    Amon Chizema
    Wei Jiang
    Jing-Ming Kuo
    Xiaoqi Song
    Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2020, 55 : 355 - 387
  • [42] Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from China
    Chen Luxi
    Lei, Liu Chun
    Yu, Dong Xiao
    Qi, Wu
    Yu, Wang Guan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (ICETMS 2013), 2013, : 1063 - 1067
  • [43] Multiple Large Shareholders and Firm Performance: Evidence from China
    Yan, Caiyu
    He, Xuefei
    Li, Juan
    He, Hongqu
    Ao, Tianping
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2023, 52 (03) : 394 - 435
  • [44] When a Good Is a Bad (or a Bad Is a Good)-Analysis of Data from an Ambiguous Nonmarket Valuation Setting
    Gudding, Petter
    Kipperberg, Gorm
    Bond, Craig
    Cullen, Kelly
    Steltzer, Eric
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (01)
  • [45] Flexible pay, firm performance and the role of unions. New evidence from Italy
    Origo, Federica
    LABOUR ECONOMICS, 2009, 16 (01) : 64 - 78
  • [46] Pay inequality and firm performance: evidence from matched employer-employee data
    Heyman, F
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2005, 37 (11) : 1313 - 1327
  • [47] Business Group Affiliation, Firm Governance, and Firm Performance: Evidence from China and India
    Singh, Deeksha A.
    Gaur, Ajai S.
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2009, 17 (04) : 411 - 425
  • [48] Firm size, performance and CEO pay: Evidence from a group of American quality companies
    Tai, LS
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2004, 15 (01): : 35 - 42
  • [49] The Effects of Abnormal Executive Pay Dispersion: Evidence from Firm Performance and Executive Turnover
    Byun, Sanghyuk
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2014, 43 (05) : 621 - 648
  • [50] Enterprise ESG Performance, Digital Transformation, and Firm Performance: Evidence from China
    Zheng, Xiuzhi
    Bu, Qianqian
    SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (04):