COH-METRIX MEASURES TEXT CHARACTERISTICS AT MULTIPLE LEVELS OF LANGUAGE AND DISCOURSE

被引:122
作者
Graesser, Arthur C. [1 ]
McNamara, Danielle S. [2 ,3 ]
Cai, Zhiqang [1 ]
Conley, Mark [1 ]
Li, Haiying [1 ]
Pennebaker, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Inst Learning Sci, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
READING-COMPREHENSION; KNOWLEDGE; LITERACY; SCHOOL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1086/678293
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Coh-Metrix analyzes texts on multiple measures of language and discourse that are aligned with multilevel theoretical frameworks of comprehension. Dozens of measures funnel into five major factors that systematically vary as a function of types of texts (e.g., narrative vs. informational) and grade level: narrativity, syntactic simplicity, word concreteness, referential cohesion, and deep (causal) cohesion. Texts are automatically scaled on these five factors with Coh-Metrix-TEA (Text Easability Assessor). This article reviews how these five factors account for text variations and reports analyses that augment Coh-Metrix in two ways. First, there is a composite measure called formality, which increases with low narrativity, syntactic complexity, word abstractness, and high cohesion. Second, the words are analyzed with Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, an automated system that measures words in texts on dozens of psychological attributes. One next step in automated text analyses is a topics analysis that scales the difficulty of conceptual topics.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 229
页数:20
相关论文
共 66 条
[41]  
McNamara D. S., 2011, TOP COGN SCI, V2, P1
[42]   Coh-Metrix: Capturing Linguistic Features of Cohesion [J].
McNamara, Danielle S. ;
Louwerse, Max M. ;
McCarthy, Philip M. ;
Graesser, Arthur C. .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2010, 47 (04) :292-330
[43]  
McNamara DS, 2014, AUTOMATED EVALUATION OF TEXT AND DISCOURSE WITH COH-METRIX, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511894664
[44]   Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence [J].
McNamara, DS ;
Kintsch, W .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 1996, 22 (03) :247-288
[45]  
McNamara DS., 2007, Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies
[46]   Understanding the strategies of document literacy and their conditions of use [J].
Mosenthal, PB .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 88 (02) :314-332
[47]  
Nelson J., 2011, Measures of text difficulty: Testing their predictive value for grade levels and student performance
[48]   The impact of science knowledge, reading skill, and reading strategy knowledge on more traditional "high-stakes" measures of high school students' science achievement [J].
O'Reilly, Tenaha ;
McNamara, Danielle S. .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2007, 44 (01) :161-196
[49]   FROM UTTERANCE TO TEXT - BIAS OF LANGUAGE IN SPEECH AND WRITING [J].
OLSON, DR .
HARVARD EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 1977, 47 (03) :257-281
[50]  
Paivio A., 1986, Mental representations: A dual coding approach