Morbidity after mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction

被引:3
|
作者
Dian, D.
Schwenn, K.
Friese, K.
Jaenicke, F.
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Frauenklin, D-80337 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Frauenklin Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
autologous breast reconstruction; morbidity;
D O I
10.1055/s-2006-924112
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose: In this study we compared the morbidity of breast-conserving surgery with mastectomy and immediate autologous reconstruction. To examine the restriction in movement and muscle strength after pedicled flap breast reconstruction, the patients underwent tests of function. Material and Methods: We followed up 144 patients with breast cancer in the period 2002-2004. Sixty-seven of them underwent breast-conserving surgery and 77 had mastectomy with immediate autologous reconstruction. To assess the impact of the muscular defect after pedicled flap reconstruction we performed functional tests of the donor area. Results: We were able to show that latissimus dorsi flap and transversus rectus abdominis flap are secure surgical procedures. We had no flap loss. There was only a slight restriction in movement in the donor area in 15% of the patients. There were no restrictions with regard to everyday life. Conclusion: Pedicled flap techniques are secure procedures for breast reconstruction (no flap loss) with low morbidity and do not affect patients in their everyday life. Microvascular flaps have to be measured against this standard.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 473
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the oncologic safety of autologous fat transfer after a total mastectomy and immediate reconstruction for breast cancer
    Omalek, Donia
    Chaltiel, Leonor
    Vaysse, Charlotte
    Gangloff, Dimitri
    Meresse, Thomas
    Chaput, Benoit
    Jouve, Eva
    Selmes, Gabrielle
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)
  • [32] Photons or Electrons After Mastectomy Without Immediate Reconstruction
    Khosla, Divya
    Kapoor, Rakesh
    Kumar, Ritesh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (05): : 1160 - 1160
  • [33] Sensitivity after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction
    Gahm, Jessica
    Jurell, Goran
    Wickman, Marie
    Hansson, Per
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2007, 41 (04): : 178 - 183
  • [34] Current evidences on immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy
    Salgarello, Marzia
    Visconti, Giuseppe
    Barone-Adesi, Liliana
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 7 : S339 - S350
  • [35] Skin Lesions after Prophylactic Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction
    Baulies, Sonia
    Melonio, Isabelle
    Freneaux, Paul
    Couturaud, Benoit
    Fitoussi, Alfred
    Rouzier, Roman
    Malhaire, Caroline
    Mallon, Peter
    Reyal, Fabien
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2013, 1 (09)
  • [36] Breast Malignancies After Mastectomy With Autologous or Implant Reconstruction
    Portnow, Leah H.
    Majid, Sana
    Maduram, Amy
    Chesebro, Allyson L.
    Karimova, E. Jane
    Chung, Stephanie H.
    Gombos, Eva C.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2022, 4 (06) : 649 - 660
  • [37] Morbidity of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after mastectomy by a subpectorally placed silicone prosthesis: the adverse effect of radiotherapy
    Contant, CME
    van Geel, AN
    van der Holt, B
    Griep, C
    Wai, RTJ
    Wiggers, T
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 26 (04): : 344 - 350
  • [38] Nipple-Areola Complex Necrosis after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Cho, Jin-Woo
    Yoon, Eul-Sik
    You, Hi-Jin
    Kim, Hyon-Surk
    Lee, Byung-Il
    Park, Seung-Ha
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2015, 42 (05): : 601 - 607
  • [39] SIMPLE MASTECTOMY WITH IMMEDIATE RECONSTRUCTION
    HORTON, CE
    ADAMSON, JE
    MLADICK, RA
    CARRAWAY, JH
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1974, 53 (01) : 42 - 47
  • [40] GLANDULAR MASTECTOMY - IMMEDIATE RECONSTRUCTION
    MARINO, H
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1952, 10 (03) : 204 - 208