Workplace interventions for preventing work disability

被引:190
|
作者
van Oostrom, Sandra H. [1 ,2 ]
Driessen, Maurice T. [1 ,2 ]
de Vet, Henrica C. W. [3 ]
Franche, Renee-Louise [4 ]
Schonstein, Eva [5 ]
Loisel, Patrick [6 ,7 ]
van Mechelen, Willem [1 ,2 ]
Anema, Johannes R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] OHSAH, Disabil Prevent Program, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Rehabil Dept, Ctr Act Work Disabil & Prevent, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[7] PREVICAP Occupat Rehabil Ctr, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; UPPER-EXTREMITY DISORDERS; SICK-LISTED EMPLOYEES; TO-WORK; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; MENTAL-DISORDERS; FOLLOW-UP; OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION; MULTIDISCIPLINARY TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD006955.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Work disability has serious consequences for all stakeholders and society. Workplace interventions are considered appropriate to facilitate return to work by reducing barriers to return to work, involving the collaboration of key stakeholders. Objectives To determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions compared to usual care or clinical interventions on work-related outcomes and health outcomes; and to evaluate whether the effects differ when applied to musculoskeletal disorders, mental health problems, or other health conditions. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Occupational Health Field Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE (EMBASE. com), and PsycINFO databases ( to November 2007). Selection criteria We included randomized controlled trials of workplace interventions aimed at return to work for workers where absence from work because of sickness was reported as a continuous outcome. Data collection and analysis Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias of the studies. Meta-analysis and qualitative analysis (using GRADE levels of evidence) were performed. Main results We included six randomized controlled trials ( 749 workers): three on low back pain, one on upper-extremity disorders, one on musculoskeletal disorders, and one on adjustment disorders. Five studies were rated as having low risk of bias for the sickness absence outcome. The results of this review show that there is moderate-quality evidence to support the use of workplace interventions to reduce sickness absence among workers with musculoskeletal disorders when compared to usual care. However, workplace interventions were not effective to improve health outcomes among workers with musculoskeletal disorders. The lack of studies made it impossible to investigate the effectiveness of workplace interventions among workers with mental health problems and other health conditions. A comparison of a workplace intervention with a clinical intervention, in one study only, yielded similar results for sickness absence and symptoms for workers with mental health problems. Authors' conclusions As a result of the few available studies, no convincing conclusions can be formulated about the effectiveness of workplace interventions on work-related outcomes and health outcomes regardless of the type of work disability. The pooled data for the musculoskeletal disorders subgroup indicated that workplace interventions are effective in the reduction of sickness absence, but they are not effective in improving health outcomes. The evidence from the subgroup analysis on musculoskeletal disorders was rated as moderate-quality evidence. Unfortunately, conclusions cannot be drawn on the effectiveness of these interventions for mental health problems and other health conditions due to a lack of studies.
引用
收藏
页数:66
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Agricultural workplace interventions to minimize work-to-home transmission of pesticides
    Fenske, R.
    Galvin, K.
    Chong, M. T.
    Negrete, M.
    Powers, K.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (06) : S91 - S91
  • [42] Preventing workplace injuries
    McLoughlin, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2004, 104 (06) : 19 - 19
  • [43] STAND MORE AT WORK INTERVENTION Workplace interventions must be holistic and sustainable
    Varney, Justin S.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 363
  • [44] Workplace interventions
    Elders, LAM
    Burdorf, A
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2004, 61 (04) : 287 - 288
  • [45] Multilevel Interventions to Promote Wellbeing in the Workplace: The H-WORK Project
    Pietrantoni, Luca
    Guglielmi, Dina
    De Angelis, Marco
    Mazzetti, Greta
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OPEN, 2023, 82 : 390 - 391
  • [46] Preventing substance abuse: Interventions that work - Stoil,MJ, Hill,G
    Piotrowski, NA
    JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 1998, 59 (01): : 119 - 120
  • [47] Preventing psychosocial risks at work: An evaluation study of labour inspectorate interventions
    Weissbrodt, Rafael
    Arial, Marc
    Graf, Maggie
    Iff, Samuel
    Giauque, David
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 110 : 355 - 362
  • [48] Work Opportunities and Workplace Characteristics for Employees with Intellectual Disability in the Norwegian Labour Market
    Garrels, Veerle
    Sigstad, Hanne Marie Hoybraten
    Wenbelborg, Christian
    Dean, Evan E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISABILITY DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION, 2024, 71 (05) : 814 - 830
  • [49] Pain in the workplace - New models of disability determination must focus on work rehabilitation
    Bradley, LA
    Alarcon, GS
    Alberts, KR
    Aaron, LA
    Martin, MY
    Sotolongo, A
    PAIN FORUM, 1997, 6 (04): : 245 - 247
  • [50] Aging with Disability in the Workplace
    Johnson, Kurt L.
    Brown, Pat A.
    Knaster, Elizabeth S.
    PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 21 (02) : 267 - +