Osteoconductive and Osteoinductive Surface Modifications of Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration: A Concise Review

被引:86
|
作者
Kazimierczak, Paulina [1 ]
Przekora, Agata [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Lublin, Chair & Dept Biochem & Biotechnol, Chodzki 1 St, PL-20093 Lublin, Poland
关键词
coatings; metallic implants; plasma; additive modifications; subtractive modifications; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; MECHANICAL STRENGTH; CARBON NANOTUBES; SCAFFOLDS; IMPLANT; CELL; OSSEOINTEGRATION; COMPOSITE; POROSITY; COATINGS;
D O I
10.3390/coatings10100971
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The main aim of bone tissue engineering is to fabricate highly biocompatible, osteoconductive and/or osteoinductive biomaterials for tissue regeneration. Bone implants should support bone growth at the implantation site via promotion of osteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and formation of bone extracellular matrix. Moreover, a very desired feature of biomaterials for clinical applications is their osteoinductivity, which means the ability of the material to induce osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells toward bone-building cells (osteoblasts). Nevertheless, the development of completely biocompatible biomaterials with appropriate physicochemical and mechanical properties poses a great challenge for the researchers. Thus, the current trend in the engineering of biomaterials focuses on the surface modifications to improve biological properties of bone implants. This review presents the most recent findings concerning surface modifications of biomaterials to improve their osteoconductivity and osteoinductivity. The article describes two types of surface modifications: (1) Additive and (2) subtractive, indicating biological effects of the resultant surfaces in vitro and/or in vivo. The review article summarizes known additive modifications, such as plasma treatment, magnetron sputtering, and preparation of inorganic, organic, and composite coatings on the implants. It also presents some common subtractive processes applied for surface modifications of the biomaterials (i.e., acid etching, sand blasting, grit blasting, sand-blasted large-grit acid etched (SLA), anodizing, and laser methods). In summary, the article is an excellent compendium on the surface modifications and development of advanced osteoconductive and/or osteoinductive coatings on biomaterials for bone regeneration.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 25
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Osteoinductive biomaterials - properties and relevance in bone repair
    Habibovic, Pamela
    de Groot, Klaas
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 1 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [12] Fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of osteoconductive and osteoinductive bone graft substitutes
    Mark Kurd
    Sarah Cohick
    Andrew Park
    Kasra Ahmadinia
    Joseph Lee
    Howard An
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 1066 - 1073
  • [13] Modulation of immune-inflammatory responses through surface modifications of biomaterials to promote bone healing and regeneration
    Batool, Fareeha
    Ozcelik, Hayriye
    Stutz, Celine
    Gegout, Pierre-Yves
    Benkirane-Jessel, Nadia
    Petit, Catherine
    Huck, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2021, 12
  • [14] Fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of osteoconductive and osteoinductive bone graft substitutes
    Kurd, Mark
    Cohick, Sarah
    Park, Andrew
    Ahmadinia, Kasra
    Lee, Joseph
    An, Howard
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (05) : 1066 - 1073
  • [15] Osteoconductive Microarchitecture of Bone Substitutes for Bone Regeneration Revisited
    Ghayor, Chafik
    Weber, Franz E.
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [16] Effectiveness of local antibiotic delivery with an osteoinductive and osteoconductive bone-graft substitute
    Beardmore, AA
    Brooks, DE
    Wenke, JC
    Thomas, DB
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (01): : 107 - 112
  • [17] Do osteoconductive bone substitutes result in similar bone regeneration for maxillary sinus augmentation when compared to osteogenic and osteoinductive bone grafts? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis
    Al-Moraissi, E. A.
    Alkhutari, A. S.
    Abotaleb, B.
    Altairi, N. H.
    Del Fabbro, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (01) : 107 - 120
  • [18] An osteoconductive collagen hyaluronate matrix for bone regeneration
    Liu, LS
    Thompson, AY
    Heidaran, MA
    Poser, JW
    Spiro, RC
    BIOMATERIALS, 1999, 20 (12) : 1097 - 1108
  • [19] The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review
    Xing, Yanghui
    Qiu, Linhui
    Liu, Danqing
    Dai, Sihan
    Sheu, Chia-Lin
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 11
  • [20] Biomaterials for bone regeneration
    Perez-Sanchez, Maria-Jose
    Ramirez-Glindon, Elena
    Lledo-Gil, Miguel
    Calvo-Guirado, Jose-Luis
    Perez-Sanchez, Cristina
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2010, 15 (03): : E517 - E522